Re: New loader(8) plugin

2003-06-06 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Is there any real reason why loader.rc is not updated by default? I'd be interested to know how many people out It was my decision. Before I wrote the stuff in *.4th that is used nowadays to read loader.conf, one had to write a loader.rc script to do any kind of special pr

Re: 5.1-BETA2 FAILURE on IBM A30p Thinkpad

2003-06-06 Thread Jesse D. Guardiani
Kevin Oberman wrote: >> From: "Jesse D. Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 02:12:32 -0400 >> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> "Andre Guibert de Bruet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Jesse, >> > >> > IBM just released (As of 5/20/2003)

Re: phoenix crash in libc_r on sparc64

2003-06-06 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Wed, 2003/06/04 at 00:30:36 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:15:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > phoenix on my sparc64 crashed while idle with the following: > > > > Fatal error '_waitq_insert: Already in queue' at line 321 in file > > /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/ut

Re: USB printing mangles printjob :-(

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:49:25 +0200 Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I send that file to the printer via the parallel port, it prints > > perfectly. If I send it via USB/ulpt there are corrupted bytes in > > the job which mess up the printout in various ways. > > I've seen this too o

VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller' class= bridge subclass = PCI-unknown B

5.1-BETA from Jun 2 PANIC

2003-06-06 Thread Sławek Żak
GDB backtrace attached. /S GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. Th

Re: USB printing mangles printjob :-(

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:49:25 +0200 > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If I send that file to the printer via the parallel port, it prints > > > perfectly. If I send it via USB/ulpt there are corrupted bytes in >

HEADS UP: sed breakage

2003-06-06 Thread Tony Finch
I managed to break sed in the course of fixing a bug yesterday. If you are having problems with buildworld breakage, ensure that you have the most recent version of sed by updating your source and rebuilding it manually. You need: $FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/sed/process.c,v 1.31 2003/06/05 12:10:19 fanf

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

2003-06-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Bryan Liesner wrote: > A non disclosure agreement is a non disclosure agreement, so no crap > from me. > > I'll give that a try and see if it makes a difference. I don't > remember off of the top of my head from the previous posts on this > subject, but does this bug apply to an Athlon XP as well?

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller' > class=

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > > Interfaces actually can be added at runtime. Existing objects (i.e. > > > objects instantiated before the new

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-06 Thread Doug Rabson
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:51, Paul Richards wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > > > > Interfaces actually can be added at runtime. Exist

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 07:45:03 -0700 Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Be aware that if your machine is a "B" (82C686B), then you have It is. > the buggy version of the chip; you need to eiter not use the > second IDE channel for anything, or you need a BIOS update, or Not using the seco

Re: New loader(8) plugin

2003-06-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:58:08AM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >Is there any real reason why loader.rc is not updated by > >default? I'd be interested to know how many people out > > It was my decision. > > Before I wrote the stuff in *.4th that is used nowadays to r

Re: ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:42:56AM -0700, Jun Su wrote: >> Good Explain. >> The same problem is in my PCG-R505DC. > > Yes, it sounds exactly like the problem with my laptop too. Please try: Index: pci.c ==

Re: [acpi-jp 2311] ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >: I'm currently working on making the PCI interrupt routing work for SMP >: and once that is done I plan to commit a change to make this >: >: #if defined(__ia64__) || de

RE: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-Jun-2003 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Con

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Lars Eggert
Robert Watson wrote: | |---++---+---| | || | The 20030228 vendor | | Fresh ACPI-CA | -- | --| sources have been | | import||

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:33:13 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 05-Jun-2003 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 > > hdr=0x

Re: FTP client dumping core

2003-06-06 Thread Fred Souza
> Try this patch: Yes, it works now, thanks. Will this patch be commited to src, or should I keep it and apply locally? Fred -- "How much does it cost to entice a dope-smoking UNIX system guru to Dayton?" -- UNIX/WORLD's First Annual Salary Survey, Brian Boyle pgp0

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Scott Long
Lars Eggert wrote: Robert Watson wrote: | |---++---+---| | || | The 20030228 vendor | | Fresh ACPI-CA | -- | --| sources have been | | import

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Richards
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:06:16PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:51, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wro

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Paul Richards wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > > > How can you add an interface at runtime? > > > > By loading a kernel module. If I load e.g. the agp kernel module, I add > > the agp_if interface to the ke

RE: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Erik Paulsen Skaalerud
> > FYI, I still see the ACPI messages described in the "Re: ACPI-0293 > > (and > > 0166) errors"-thread on -current ca. 5/9/2003 on > yesterday's -current. > > > > Lars > > Yeah, ACPI is causing many problems these days, much of which > can be traced back to non-compliant system BIOS's. The new >

RE: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, June 05, 2003 18:59:49 +0200 Erik Paulsen Skaalerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, I still see the ACPI messages described in the "Re: ACPI-0293 > (and > 0166) errors"-thread on -current ca. 5/9/2003 on yesterday's -current. > > Lars Yeah, ACPI is causing many problems these d

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Scott Long
Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, June 05, 2003 18:59:49 +0200 Erik Paulsen Skaalerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, I still see the ACPI messages described in the "Re: ACPI-0293 > (and > 0166) errors"-thread on -current ca. 5/9/2003 on yesterday's -current. > > Lars Yeah, ACPI is causing

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2003-06-06 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:32:32AM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > Dear Hackers, > > Another release is available for download at > > http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030604.tar.gz > > I am regret to announce that this is probably the last release. > My company has announced tha

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Be aware that if your machine is a "B" (82C686B), then you have > > It is. > > > the buggy version of the chip; you need to eiter not use the > > second IDE channel for anything, or you need a BIOS update, or > > Not using

LOR in kern_thread.c

2003-06-06 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I was playing with libkse and got the follow LOR: lock order reversal 1st 0xc6ce0aa8 sigacts (sigacts) @ /local/usr.src/sys/kern/subr_trap.c:248 2nd 0xc6cbc250 process lock (process lock) @ /local/usr.src/sys/kern/kern_threa d.c:1439 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c04fd0b6,c6cbc250,c04f9a3a,c04f9a3a

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:33:13 -0400 (EDT) > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It doesn't really need to know about it. Perhaps acpi should include > > a dummy driver similar to the 'hostb' driver to "eat" such devices. > > Does this mean it should already dis

Re: [acpi-jp 2332] Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: > > For the record, yesterday's sources STILL produce the panic at 0x7 for > > me on transition to battery. > > > > I can get more crashdumps/kernels if someone asks. > > I've mentioned this for the last ~1.5 months. > > The official pos

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:14:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Pow

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:10:35 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:14:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in > 5.x.. :-( Note that, I only check in the 5.x's NOTES You didn't check in the right NOTES then. 5-CURRENT has different NOTES files, one general, machine independen

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:56:50 +0200, Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in 5.x.. :-( Note that, I only check in the 5.x's NOTES You didn't check in the right NOT

k5 build failure

2003-06-06 Thread Anthony Schneider
kerberos5 sources cvsup'd from about 30 minutes ago. thanks. -Anthony. FreeBSD tool. 5.1-BETA FreeBSD 5.1-BETA #1: Wed May 21 10:11:40 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TOOL i386 ===> doc ===> lib ===> lib/libroken ===> lib/libvers ===> lib/libasn1 ===> lib/libhdb ===> l

Re: our compiler can't convert longlong to float? 5.1-RC1

2003-06-06 Thread Jan Stocker
Another thing with this code. > > #include > > typedef long long longlong; > > main() > > { > > longlong ll=1; > > float f; > > FILE *file=fopen("conftestval", "w"); > > f = (float) ll; > > fprintf(file,"%g\n",f); > > close(file); I think this has to be "fclose" > > exit (

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:56:15 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:56:50 +0200, Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in 5.x.

Re: k5 build failure

2003-06-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:28:01PM -0400, Anthony Schneider wrote: > kerberos5 sources cvsup'd from about 30 minutes ago. > [...] > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libkrb5/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5 > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libkrb5/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn

Re: k5 build failure

2003-06-06 Thread Anthony Schneider
same error. On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:17:07PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:28:01PM -0400, Anthony Schneider wrote: > > kerberos5 sources cvsup'd from about 30 minutes ago. > > > [...] > > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro > > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libkrb5/../../../cry

Re: USB printing mangles printjob :-(

2003-06-06 Thread James Tanis
Can't say I've ever had a problem with my HP DJ5550 on a USB port. On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:26:25 +0200 Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:49:25 +0200 > > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

ACPI + PCMCIA panic's.

2003-06-06 Thread firewolf
Hello, I am having an issue with using acpi on a Compaq Armada M700. Without ACPI everything work's great with the exception of APM. (I had it working on a prior install, now for some reason it isn't). I've just lived with the fact that ACPI + PCMCIA didn't appear to like each other. It does ran

Re: cvsup 06/05/2003 breaks nvidia driver

2003-06-06 Thread jimd_NOSPAM
Thanks for the suggestion about recompiling the nvidia driver, but I do after each kernel compile and install, so that isn't the answer, though not a bad idea. Recompiles of both the Linux-nvidia-port and the standalone-nvidia driver failed, so I am in the process, now, of backing out of everything

Re: [acpi-jp 2325] Re: ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on SonyVAIO's

2003-06-06 Thread Iain Templeton
John Baldwin wrote: > > >Please try: > >Index: pci.c >=== >RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pci.c,v >retrieving revision 1.215 >diff -u -r1.215 pci.c >--- pci.c 31 May 2003 20:34:36 - 1.215 >+++ pci.c 2 Jun 2003

i386-undermydesk-freebsd?

2003-06-06 Thread jimd_NOSPAM
What does "i386-undermydesk-freebsd" refer to? What is it used for? Is there an "i386-inthedrawer-freebsd", or "i386-intheXbox-freebsd"? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

Re: i386-undermydesk-freebsd?

2003-06-06 Thread Mike Barcroft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What does "i386-undermydesk-freebsd" refer to? What is it used for? Is there > an "i386-inthedrawer-freebsd", or "i386-intheXbox-freebsd"? As a general rule of thumb, FreeBSD boxes should be kept under desks. If your system isn't under a desk, consid

Re: i386-undermydesk-freebsd?

2003-06-06 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What does "i386-undermydesk-freebsd" refer to? What is it used for? Is there > > an "i386-inthedrawer-freebsd", or "i386-intheXbox-freebsd"? > > As a general rule of thumb, FreeBSD boxes should be kept un

Re: i386-undermydesk-freebsd?

2003-06-06 Thread David Leimbach
I thought it was the Monica Lewinsky edition of FreeBSD. On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 07:20 PM, Mike Barcroft wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What does "i386-undermydesk-freebsd" refer to? What is it used for? Is there an "i386-inthedrawer-freebsd", or "i386-intheXbox-freeb

Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Doug Barton
[ Please respect followups to -arch, thanks. ] As most of you are probably already aware, there have been two recent releases of BIND 8. Version 8.3.5 is the "bugfix, and new minor features" release on the 8.3.x branch that we've currently got in the tree already. 8.4.0 is (more or less) the "all

Re: cvsup 06/05/2003 breaks nvidia driver

2003-06-06 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, 18:56-0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion about recompiling the nvidia driver, but I do after > each kernel compile and install, so that isn't the answer, though not a bad > idea. Recompiles of both the Linux-nvidia-port and the standalone-nvidia > driver

Re: FTP client dumping core

2003-06-06 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, 12:57-0300, Fred Souza wrote: > > Try this patch: > > Yes, it works now, thanks. Will this patch be commited to src, or > should I keep it and apply locally? I have posted the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED], hope he will commit it soon or later. FreeBSD will get this code wit

LOR: sched lock vs. sio + panic in sched_choose()

2003-06-06 Thread David P. Reese Jr.
I've been getting a lot of these for the last two weeks on my SMP box. This panic is on -CURRENT from earlier today. Scheduler is ULE. lock order reversal 1st 0xc047f820 sched lock (sched lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:548 2nd 0xc04b83c0 sio (sio) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/sio/sio.c:3242 Stack

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:09 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote: FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.html I might be able to buy your arguments for supporting BIND 8 instead of BIND 9 in -STABLE, but not in -CURRENT. BIND 9

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 12:09 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote: > > > FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please > > see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.html > > I might be able to buy your arguments for supporting BIND 8

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:57:19 -0500 Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do'h! You are right that I didn't check in /usr/src/sys/conf/.. It does > > exist and I am doing the rebuild kernel right now.. Thanks.. > > Here's the result: > > # dmesg | grep v

Re: cvsup 06/05/2003 breaks nvidia driver

2003-06-06 Thread none
After having installed 5.1-RC1, the nvidia driver, and named, are back in full operation. Yeah! On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion about recompiling the nvidia driver, but I do after > each kernel compile and install, so that isn't the answer, though not a b

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 10:14:39 -0700 Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Be aware that if your machine is a "B" (82C686B), then you have > > > > It is. I'm not that sure anymore... see below. > > > the buggy vers

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-06 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Lars Eggert writes: > Robert Watson wrote: | > >|---++---+-- > -| > >| || | The 20030228 vendor > | > >| Fresh ACPI-CA | -- | --| sources have been

Reproducible hard freeze on 5.1-CURRENT

2003-06-06 Thread Robin P. Blanchard
Upon launching samba-2.2.8a (via ports) on the below system, the machine immediately hard freezes. I've included interesting portions of kernel config. Any suggestions how I can acquire more useful information ? # uname -a FreeBSD darwin 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Jun 5 12:28:54 EDT

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 10:14:39 -0700 Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the German page: > > http://www.hardtecs4u.com/reviews/2001/ep8kta3-mod/index12.php > > Basically: > > o Disable PCI master read caching > o Lower PCI latency to "0-32" > o Disable PCI delay t

interesting problem

2003-06-06 Thread David Leimbach
So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is supported by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases. What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release ISOs that will include drivers not included in the default distribution? Or is it possible to s

Re: FTP and command-line multiple downloads

2003-06-06 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 05:46:37PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:37:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:34:06PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Since upgrading bento to running 5.0, it appears that I can no longer > > > download multiple files f

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Robinson
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > FreeBSD development model requires that what we import in -current, for > the most part, be what we plan to eventually MFC. That factor alone > eliminates the possibility of importing BIND 9 at this time. Sorry to wade in here - let m

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.06.06 14:36:44 +0100, Paul Robinson wrote: > This is almost as bad as OpenBSD sticking with BIND 4... OpenBSD has actually uses BIND 9 now... -- Simon L. Nielsen pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: interesting problem

2003-06-06 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems David Leimbach wrote: > So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is > supported > by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases. > > What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release ISOs > that > will include drivers not included in the d

How to ask for help on this list (was Re: Reproducible hard freezeon 5.1-CURRENT)

2003-06-06 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:48:17 -0400 "Robin P. Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Upon launching samba-2.2.8a (via ports) on the below system, the machine > immediately hard freezes. I've included interesting portions of kernel > config. Any suggestions how I can acquire more useful information

Re: interesting problem

2003-06-06 Thread dave
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 08:53 AM, Soeren Schmidt wrote: It seems David Leimbach wrote: So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is supported by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases. What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release ISOs t

Re: interesting problem

2003-06-06 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems dave wrote: > > It seems David Leimbach wrote: > >> So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is > >> supported > >> by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases. > >> > >> What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release > >> ISOs > >> th

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Richards
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote: > > > At 12:09 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > > FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please > > > see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.h

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > This problem is under investigation. We already know why this error gets > printed, but there is still a discussion how to fix it cleanly. This is what I'll likely commit in the short term. Index: pci.c =

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Bill Moran
Paul Robinson wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: FreeBSD development model requires that what we import in -current, for the most part, be what we plan to eventually MFC. That factor alone eliminates the possibility of importing BIND 9 at this time. Sorry to wade i

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:25:55 -0400 (EDT) "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is what I'll likely commit in the short term. [globally disable the check with a sysctl] To have this at boot time we have to set it in loader.conf, but then we not only do not check for viapm, we also do

Re: interesting problem

2003-06-06 Thread Matt Douhan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 06 June 2003 14.21, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > > Get me a 3112 based controller on my desk :) > If this is an option, let me know what make and model you would need and I will make sure we get a sponsor for such a controller from the sponsor o

Re: cvsup 06/05/2003 breaks nvidia driver

2003-06-06 Thread jimd_nospam
If you started X (by itself) and the screen flickered on and off, then I would suspect that it is being told to use a video mode that your card, or more likely - monitor, won't support. If that is true, then you could be in danger of damaging your monitor. 1) Got all available documentation avail

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-Jun-2003 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:33:13 -0400 (EDT) > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 05-Jun-2003 Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about >> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068

RE: LOR: sched lock vs. sio + panic in sched_choose() [ULE + SMPpanic]

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 06-Jun-2003 David P. Reese Jr. wrote: > I've been getting a lot of these for the last two weeks on my SMP box. > This panic is on -CURRENT from earlier today. Scheduler is ULE. > > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc047f820 sched lock (sched lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:548 > 2nd 0xc04b

Re: k5 build failure

2003-06-06 Thread Anthony Schneider
> Maybe you could show us your /etc/make.conf and the exact > command line (and environment) to build world then? > it now dies with the appended error. make.conf: # -- use.perl generated deltas -- # # Created: Tue May 20 15:18:24 2003 # Setting to use base perl from ports: PERL_VER=5.6.1 PERL_VE

[PATCH] hcsecd(8) Bluetooth link keys/PIN codes management daemon

2003-06-06 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Dear Hackers, please find attached patch for the hcsecd(8) Bluetooth link keys/PIN codes management daemon. this patch is against the latest release http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030604.tar.gz hcsecd(8) is now able to cache link keys that were generated from the PIN codes. to p

Ports Bug (Nagios)

2003-06-06 Thread Adam
I found a bug in the /ports/net/naios port. More correctly, I think it would be in /ports/net/nagios-plugins. I had Postgres 7.2 installed on my system. I did this manually from source. It seems that when you choose to have postgres support for nagios, it doesn't check to see if the library exi

Re: Ports Bug (Nagios)

2003-06-06 Thread Tim Kientzle
Adam wrote: I found a bug in the /ports/net/naios port. More correctly, I think it would be in /ports/net/nagios-plugins. I had Postgres 7.2 installed on my system. I did this manually from source. It seems that when you choose to have postgres support for nagios, it doesn't check to see if th

Re: geom_vol_ffs problems

2003-06-06 Thread Per Kristian Hove
I've nailed it down to this: geom_vol_ffs assumes that a file system is able to fill the partition completely. That's not a valid assumption, since the file system size is a multiple of the file system block size (in my case 16k bytes = 32 blocks), and the partition size is/should be a multiple of

[PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then we don't change the intline. In other words, if we can't route the interrupt, we just assu

Re: geom_vol_ffs problems

2003-06-06 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:36PM +0200, Per Kristian Hove wrote: > I've nailed it down to this: geom_vol_ffs assumes that a file system > is able to fill the partition completely. That's not a valid > assumption, since the file system size is a multiple of the file > system block size (in my case

Re: SMBFS automounting broken?

2003-06-06 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:57:09PM -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > Hi! > > Recently, I noticed that my samba shares were not automounted on > boot. > > What I understand of it is that netfs_types is defined in > rc.d/mountcritlocal, but not in rc.d/mountcritremote, which makes the > code: You are a

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:13:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. > Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific > and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then > we don't change the i

Re: SMBFS automounting broken?

2003-06-06 Thread The Anarcat
On Fri Jun 06, 2003 at 11:23:37AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:57:09PM -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Recently, I noticed that my samba shares were not automounted on > > boot. > > > > What I understand of it is that netfs_types is defined in > > rc.d/mountc

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. : Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific : and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >: I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. >: Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific >: and 2) if the interrupt r

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-06-06 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-06 18:49:32 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-06-06 18:49:32 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-06 18:51:51 - building world TB --- cd /home

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:13:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. > Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific > and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then > we don't change the i

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. > : Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:04:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Also, we haven't > > recorded our info in the underlying pci register. Don't know if that > > wi

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-rout

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I : booted my printserver with a recent kernel. PCIBIOS! Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Bill Moran wrote: > So, as I see it, the FreeBSD developers carefully evaluate claims of "newer, > better" and make decisions based on internal testing and experience - not > marketing hype. Of course, the BIND folks don't want to continue to maintain > BIND 8, so it's only na

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I > : booted my printserver with a recent kernel. > > PCIBIOS! Well - I

PANIC: FreeBSD dislikes temps (panic when mounting /tmp)

2003-06-06 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Robert, I cc'ed you because you are usually guilty anyway... (besides, there's a ea thingy there :) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/home/dcs$ gdb -k /dos/crash/kernel.17 /dos/crash/vmcore.17 GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Gene

Re: geom_vol_ffs problems

2003-06-06 Thread Per Kristian Hove
[Gordon Tetlow, 2003-06-06] | Thanks for doing this analysis. I've run into the same thing here at | work but I just haven't had any time to debug it. I'll see if I can | work something up that'll address this problem. Given that it should be OK to have a file system smaller than the partition

Re: LOR: sched lock vs. sio + panic in sched_choose() [ULE + SMPpanic]

2003-06-06 Thread David P. Reese Jr.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:39:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 06-Jun-2003 David P. Reese Jr. wrote: > > I've been getting a lot of these for the last two weeks on my SMP box. > > This panic is on -CURRENT from earlier today. Scheduler is ULE. > > > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xc047f8

Re: PANIC: FreeBSD dislikes temps (panic when mounting /tmp)

2003-06-06 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Robert, I cc'ed you because you are usually guilty anyway... (besides, > there's a ea thingy there :) I probably am, actually :-). Is the file system in question UFS or UFS2? To summarize the context of the crash: when UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOSTART is pres

  1   2   >