Sorry, if I'm repeating something already said, but
the tone of your mail would indicate that I'm not.
This doesn't sound like an intrinsic limitation of
devfs, just an issue with how it is structured now.
There should just be a central file for all the
devices which devfs sucks in at build (or m
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:16:49AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> Sorry, if I'm repeating something already said, but
> the tone of your mail would indicate that I'm not.
>
> This doesn't sound like an intrinsic limitation of
> devfs, just an issue with how it is structured now.
> There should just be a
Kip Macy wrote:
> Sorry, if I'm repeating something already said, but
> the tone of your mail would indicate that I'm not.
>
> This doesn't sound like an intrinsic limitation of
> devfs, just an issue with how it is structured now.
> There should just be a central file for all the
> devices which
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 17), John De Boskey said:
> > It would be nice if rc.conf could start a 2nd copy of named (split
> > dns). Comments on the following simplistic patch?
>
> Just upgrade to bind 9 and set up two views. Much easier :)
If bind 8 is going to stay in the tr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway writes:
>
>On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:16:49AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
>> This doesn't sound like an intrinsic limitation of
>> devfs, just an issue with how it is structured now.
s/structured/used by drivers/
>> There should just be a central file for
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
>
>> I'm glad you brought this up... I'd like to see /dev/devctl made mode 600
>> instead of 644 because it does not look very robust and because only one
>> devctl can be open at a time.
>>
>> The two othe
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:16:49AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> > Sorry, if I'm repeating something already said, but
> > the tone of your mail would indicate that I'm not.
> >
> > This doesn't sound like an intrinsic limitation of
> > devfs, just an issue w
Installing 5.0-DP2
From: "Frode Nordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority:
3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello,
Installation from DOS fs does not w
Sorry about previous posting without subject. It was supposed to be
"Installing 5.0-DP2".
I was posting with my webmail using Lynx, so I guess that combination did
not work well :)
Mvh,
Frode Nordahl
Frode Nordahl said:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Installation from DOS fs does not work. The firsr error m
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
My guess is that nobody use 1.44 floppies any more to boot.
But when I wanted to fire up an old box which only has a floppy
it did not grock the msfroot floppy:
'/mfsroot not found'
Which is IMHO correct since the mfsroot-floppy contains 'mfsroot.gz'
probably an easy fix if you know
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:42:18 +0100
"Willem Jan Withagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> My guess is that nobody use 1.44 floppies any more to boot.
> But when I wanted to fire up an old box which only has a floppy
> it did not grock the msfroot floppy:
>
> '/mfsroot not found'
I just had
seems I've backed myself into a corner.
I've got 4.4-Release installed, and have cvsup'ed src-all into a /usr prefix.
make buildworld completed successfully, but now I cannot continue without
libc.so.5. Unfortuantely, I can't build libc 5 without the current kernel,
and vise-versa. I get a cor
What's wrong with having /etc/minor_perm et consortes
a la Solaris? With sensible kernel defaults to allow
booting without your favourite root partition.
--
<< Marcin Cieslak // [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>
msg46925/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Patrick Stinson wrote:
seems I've backed myself into a corner.
I've got 4.4-Release installed, and have cvsup'ed src-all into a /usr
prefix.
make buildworld completed successfully, but now I cannot continue without
libc.so.5. Unfortuantely, I can't build libc 5 without the current
kernel,
and
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:58:08PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:44:12AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > Next bad thing discovered about new awk just looking at sourse code: it
> > not support locale (collating in regexp ranges too, of course). We just
> > make great
Hi,
I'm trying to install 5.0DP2 on my Dell Inspiron 2650 laptop.
Everything
seems to be going fine until I get a:
cbb0: unsupported card type detected
at this stage, the machine reboots a few seconds after showing the
message. Everything appears to be OK with ACPI and so on initialised.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:01:33 +0100 (CET)
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The patch adds an option -r to chown(8) and chgrp(1), which
> > > does pretty much the same as the -r option of t
On 19-Nov-2002 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:01:33 +0100 (CET)
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > The patch adds an option -r to chown(8) and chgrp(1), which
>>
This is, for a change, not relative to my Vaio (which still won't boot
current, in spite of various improvements apparent in boot -v).
Hardware is a Supermicro P3TDDE (SMP P3-1G, via chipset).
2 60g drives, ad0 has a complete -stable on it, ad1 current.
First, GEOM:
On trying to do "boot0cfg -s1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > No, the default permissions are specified in the driver source code
> > via make_dev().
>
> The drivers only get the magic numbers for uids and gids from a central
> file. This is bad enough. I think all devices should have ownership
> root:wheel and
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:35:59AM -0800, Pete Carah wrote:
> This is, for a change, not relative to my Vaio (which still won't boot
> current, in spite of various improvements apparent in boot -v).
>
> Hardware is a Supermicro P3TDDE (SMP P3-1G, via chipset).
> 2 60g drives, ad0 has a complete -s
With the DP2 iso (from ftp5), I get a crash on boot right after the acpi
module is loaded. The error is (manually copied) and occured 5 out of 5
times that I tried:
Fatal trap 12 : page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x5e6a200
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
ins
Thus spake Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm concerned about the used character: "-r" is similiar to "-R"
>
> Yes, `-r' would be a very poor choice for the reason you state.
Agreed, but the precedent has already been set by touch(1) and
truncate(1). If we're going to get it wrong some
On 19-Nov-2002 Matt Haught wrote:
> With the DP2 iso (from ftp5), I get a crash on boot right after the acpi
> module is loaded. The error is (manually copied) and occured 5 out of 5
> times that I tried:
Could you provide the lines of output prior to the crash?
> Fatal trap 12 : page fault whi
Dear Hackers,
The next snapshot is available for download at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20021119.tar.gz
Below is a quick summary of changes
o Minor fixes for various man pages
o Due to copyright issues firmware file has been removed
from BT3C driver. Users must obtain
I've been running 4.x on my desktop for months now, with the de driver ...
I've decided that since we're coming up on release, let's move up to it
(yes, I know, its not perfect yet, but its only my desktop) ...
First problem I hit was that my ethernet card wasn't detected ... from
ftp'ng down the
Just got everything up, made sure that it knew how to mount my file
systems, watched it fsck those same file systems ... but as soon as it
started to install, it reported out of space errors ...
On ALT-F2, it looks like its trying to write to:
./usr/share/dict/..
instead of, what I believe its
On 19-Nov-2002 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I've been running 4.x on my desktop for months now, with the de driver ...
> I've decided that since we're coming up on release, let's move up to it
> (yes, I know, its not perfect yet, but its only my desktop) ...
>
> First problem I hit was that my et
On 19-Nov-2002 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Just got everything up, made sure that it knew how to mount my file
> systems, watched it fsck those same file systems ... but as soon as it
> started to install, it reported out of space errors ...
>
> On ALT-F2, it looks like its trying to write to:
>
In freebsd.current, you wrote:
>
> Just got everything up, made sure that it knew how to mount my file
> systems, watched it fsck those same file systems ... but as soon as it
> started to install, it reported out of space errors ...
>
> On ALT-F2, it looks like its trying to write to:
>
> ./usr
'K, that is what I did ...
One final issue on this first attempt ... when I go into 'partition' an
existing drive, how do I get it to 'mount' my existing swap device?
rightnow, I just deleted and created it, but that just doesn't sound ...
safe ...
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> O
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>
> What's wrong with having /etc/minor_perm et consortes
> a la Solaris?
Nothing, and we already have the equivalent. You've missed the point
under discussion, which is the value of the "sensible kernel
defaults" being wrong for a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robe
rt Watson writes:
>> > No, the default permissions are specified in the driver source code
>> > via make_dev().
>>
>> The drivers only get the magic numbers for uids and gids from a central
>> file. This is bad enough. I think all devices should have ownersh
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:21:56PM -0500, Matt Haught wrote:
> With the DP2 iso (from ftp5), I get a crash on boot right after the acpi
> module is loaded. The error is (manually copied) and occured 5 out of 5
> times that I tried:
I recently worked on loading 5.0 onto a dual Xeon which panic'd
The following PR has two patches attached which address the lack of some
documentation of make.conf in the manual page. It also contains a patch
for make.conf to fix style inconsistencies and two (if I recall
correctly) items which are documented in the manual page but did not
exist in the example
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robe
> rt Watson writes:
>
> >> > No, the default permissions are specified in the driver source code
> >> > via make_dev().
> >>
> >> The drivers only get the magic numbers for uids and gids from a central
> >> fil
I keep getting lots of
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1002: could sleep
with "drm memory" locked from @/dev/drm/drm_memory.h:217
and
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with "pcm0" locked from
/usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c:134
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with "p
On 19-Nov-2002 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> 'K, that is what I did ...
>
> One final issue on this first attempt ... when I go into 'partition' an
> existing drive, how do I get it to 'mount' my existing swap device?
> rightnow, I just deleted and created it, but that just doesn't sound ...
> saf
* De: Michal Mertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-19 ]
[ Subjecte: WITNESS complaints ]
> /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with "pcm0" locked from
> /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c:134
> /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with "pcm0:fake" locked from
> /usr/src
I'm having occasional panics when doing disk-intensive activities like a
buildworld or portupgrade, and I'm having trouble getting useful backtraces.
For some reason I can't get the kernel to write a dump out. Most recently,
while updating the pkgdb, my system did this:
Nov 19 14:47:19 basement s
On 19-Nov-2002 (04:06:22/GMT) John De Boskey wrote:
> I need to kick off 2 name servers. The first is authoritive for
> the domain as seen externally and the 2nd which is authoritive
> for the internal network.
I have only one named running, SOA for torrini.org for external and
internal host and
I have a couple BP6's running -stable and was having hard lock problems
under heavy IO until I dropped back to ATA33 on the drives (I moved them
to the onboard Intel controller instead of the HPT366). sos@ informed me
that the HPT366 has a buggy DMA controller and that ATA66 on them wouldn't
work.
Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>
> What's wrong with having /etc/minor_perm et consortes
> a la Solaris? With sensible kernel defaults to allow
> booting without your favourite root partition.
What's wrong with just having /dev?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >I have to say that the ownership issue has been a pet peeve of mine for
> >some time: I would really like the kernel to know about exactly two magic
> >id values: uid 0 (suser uid, default uid, default devfs owner), and gid 0
> >(default gid, default devfs owner). Hard-
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Le Tuesday 19 November 2002 22:35, Nate Lawson a écrit :
> I have a couple BP6's running -stable and was having hard lock problems
> under heavy IO until I dropped back to ATA33 on the drives (I moved them
> to the onboard Intel controller instead of the HPT366). sos@ informed me
> that the HPT366
Evening all ...
Working on getting DP2 installed on my Sony VAIO ... the fxp0 onboard, I
don't have the adapter for anymore (wires frayed), so I have a Linksys
Combo EthernetCard plugged into the PCMCIA slot ...
Booted up off of floppy, and looking at ALT-F2, it has detected the
ethernet car
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> bug that should be fixed before 5.0-RELEASE is out.
I agree. There is no locale yet and I never see that patch.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
msg4
Hello,
I'm installing DP2 on a Dell Inspiron 7000 so I can get the CardBus
support. I installed 4.4-RELEASE first (only CD available) and have
already setup the disklabels.
Now, under 5-DP2, when I'm at the disklabel editor I see the
'partitions' that I created earlier.
I can easily select the m
Hi, Everybody
In the 4.x version, I can use mknod to create a device, for example:
"mknod raidctl c 201 0 root:operator".
But in 5.0, If I use the devfs(default), I do not know how to use some
command
to create a device like 'mknod' doing in 4.x.
Another question:
In DP2: I found the disk par
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:29:16AM +0800, kai ouyang wrote:
> Hi, Everybody
> In the 4.x version, I can use mknod to create a device, for example:
> "mknod raidctl c 201 0 root:operator".
> But in 5.0, If I use the devfs(default), I do not know how to use some
> command
You can't `mknod` any d
Dear David,
From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hi,a little question about DP2.
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:47:39 -0800 (PST)
>From: "kai ouyang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:29:16 +0800
>Hi, Everybody
> In the 4.x version, I can use mkn
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:38:38AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> > bug that should be fixed before 5.0-RELEASE is out.
>
> I agree. There is no locale yet
< said:
> Actually it is the 'c' slice that is generally used to indicate the whole
> disk. This is still the case in 5.0. However, I am unable to tell you what
> 'd' used to represent. I am also clueless on this particular detail.
No, the `c' partition usually indicates the whole FreeBSD slice.
Dear smkelly,
From: Sean Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: kai ouyang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hi,a little question about DP2.
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:07:49 -0600
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:29:16AM +0800, kai ouyang wrote:
You can't `mknod` any device in /dev that isn
< said:
> I don't know why the 'c' partition doesn't start at 0.
> It is strange.
For backwards compatibility, the FreeBSD 4.x kernel would fake up the
partition tables so that they would look like old (pre-slicing)
FreeBSD partition tables; i.e., the starting offset of the slice would
be subtrac
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 14:27:53 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:38:38AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> > > bug that should be
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I'm glad you brought this up... I'd like to see /dev/devctl made mode 600
: instead of 644 because it does not look very robust and because only one
: devctl can be open at a time.
644 is the right permissions to
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi,
:
: I'm trying to install 5.0DP2 on my Dell Inspiron 2650 laptop.
: Everything
: seems to be going fine until I get a:
:
: cbb0: unsupported card type detected
:
: at this stage, the machine reboot
Replying to my own message:
---
> 2 60g drives, ad0 has a complete -stable on it, ad1 current.
>
> First, GEOM:
> On trying to do "boot0cfg -s1 /dev/ad0" to get back to booting stable,
> to try to recover from the next problem, I get "operation not permitted".
> This didn't
Dear Wollman,
From: Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For backwards compatibility, the FreeBSD 4.x kernel would fake up the
partition tables so that they would look like old (pre-slicing)
FreeBSD partition tables; i.e., the starting offset of the slice would
be subtracted from all of the partiti
I'm trying to install DP2 to old machine (P2 dual). This box has 2GB
IDE disk and ran NT4 before.
When entering fdisk editor after booting from CD-ROM, I cannot delete
NTFS partition by "D" key. "D" key only shows cursor up (NTFS is at
offset 63, offset 0 seems boot selector for NT).
Can I do
just cvsup'd the current yesterday , but build native_threads still
failure by used jdk13
>>>Recursively making native all @ Wed Nov 20 14:01:47 CST 2002 ...
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/j2sdk1.3.1/make/java/hpi/native'
gmake ../../../../build/bsd-i386/lib/i386/native_
Is the disk geometry displayed correctly? I had a similar problem with
DP2 on a Maxtor Atlas 10k III (18.4GB). Geom displayed in fdisk w/zero
cylinders. Manually setting the geometry fixed the problem.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> I'm trying to install DP2 to old machine (P2 du
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows where there is some info on the extended
attributes in ufs2? The release notes for RC2 just point to
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/README.extattr. SInce I don't want to download the whole
of -current, I was hoping there might be some info on the 'net somewhere?
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:46:07PM +1030, Ian Moore wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if anyone knows where there is some info on the extended
> attributes in ufs2? The release notes for RC2 just point to
> /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/README.extattr. SInce I don't want to download the whole
> of -current,
1) I burned the ISO image. Booted from the CD. When installing, if I try to
do a network install of some part, it asks me the interface, I select xl0, my
3com card. It asks for IPV6, I say no, it asks for dhcp, I say yes--but
nothing happens (none of the values fill in). I'm guessing this is
68 matches
Mail list logo
