I forget
which revision I should refer.
Hints? TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
don't
understand why v.2.2.2 reject it.
Any explanations? TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
That is also the solution: make it public.
Ok, I made it public instead of published. FPC v.2.2.2 is able to
compile it. But, the problem with access violation still persists. :(
Anyway, thanks for the hint.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc
how this script determines the program (not the
compilation process) run successfully or not.
TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
If one fails (exit code <>0), evalution is stopped and the revision is
marked as broken.
Ok. Thanks for the explanation. I'll give it a try then. :)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
I removed
*all* .ppu files in the harddrive before doing the compilation. As it
still didn't help, now I'm stuck! :(
Should I post the strace output here? Hints? TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
quot;readable" text of it. :-D
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
actually I don't quite understand how to read dtruss output, so I was
just guessing based on "readable" text of it. :-D
In case there's somebody would like to help me, here's the dstruss output...
simba:extpas bee$ sudo dtruss
/opt/local/apache2/cgi-bin/ExtPascalSa
I've read that there are some issues with FPC 2.2.0 on Mac OSX.
What issues? Is it about threading?
Is it save to install version 2.3.1 already ?
I'm using 2.3.1 on Mac OSX intel now. It was compiled using 2.2.0.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pasca
s a software.
You don't think that FPC is only able to make a "hello world" program,
do you? :-P
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
times I just don't understand
why it didn't work. :(
Are there any references out there describing about this topic in
details? TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
find what caused the problem. Such case didn't happen on windows.
Anyway, thanks for the tips, Graeme.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
use common LDAP
server.
Hints? TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Sometimes I just understand those guys.
I meant: "Sometime I just *don't* understand those guys."
Sorry for the typo. :)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
(non M$). Also that's why their other OP-based
products starting to support FPC and Lazarus (to target non M$
platforms). RO is smarter than CodeGear/Embarcadero, obviously. ;)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://
I simply made a symlink name libfbclient.so in folder /usr/lib which
point to
/Library/Frameworks/Firebird.framework/Versions/Current/Firebird then
everything worked fine (as in Linux).
HTH.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa
rking framework for
FPC? At least able to run on the above 3 OSes. Indy? Synapse? lNet? And
for what reasons?
I don't need GUI/widget support as it would be only server-to-server
communication and mostly run as daemon/service.
TIA.
-Bee-
___
It does. I use it on 64-bit.
Is it working on Mac (intel)?
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
framework for ExtPascal project.
What do you think? TIA.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
enhancement
suggestions are also came as my request (CGI gateway, Mac support,
enumeration, etc). I can help on the same things here.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
that I couldn't do when using Powtils. :)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
eway that redirect a CGI request to an FCGI service independently (as
long as web server supports CGI protocol).
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
pache version and similar procedure on
IIS)" section on the same article above.
Personally, I prefer the later because I have better control over the
CGI gateway and the FCGI service. Especially during development, you
don't want to restart your web server each time you recompile
lNet has fastcgi support. Maybe it's interesting for you. It can connect
to some server or spawn some itself. Implemented in lib/lfastcgi.pp.
I didn't know about this. I'll take a look at it. Anyway, what I need is
*official* FCGI package from FPC as CGI and Apache
ragement, Michael. I appreciate it. :)
BTW, it'd be nice if Morfik also supports FCGI. ;)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
st it there and refer them to me ;-)
Unfortunately, I can't request it for free anymore. ;-)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I'll have a look during the weekend.
Thank you very much, Michael. :)
Nope. I had to buy Morfik too. luckily they lowered their prices
significantly.
Does purchasing include Developer Assist support?
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-p
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=9016
What about those bugs? Both are fixed/closed.
You said by yourself, it's an FPC bug.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinf
Yes, but it's fixed in 2.2.2
ExtPascal author claimed that it's still reproducable in FPC 2.2.2 and
2.3.1. Perhaps it's fixed but ExtPascal's multithreading mechanism is
wrong somehow, or perhaps the other way around. I'm not sure.
-Bee-
__
Our discussion brought us to:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=9016
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=10815
Also:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=11490
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=11896
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist
playing around with it for a while and already built
an application based on it in production. So far, it performs very well.
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
use the same compiled source on any of it's supported
> platforms.
FPC is a general purpose compiler. What you need is a CGI or web framework
that can be compiled by FPC. You don't need to do anything particular to
FPC.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.
ased. There are some area where desktop applications could do the
job better and can't be replaced by web-based application. ;)
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
e into consideration, because it meant that
> 6 times more people could work on a single server simultaneously.
Performance isn't the only important things. I believe we all know that. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
re working on client side.
> (fpc virtual machine project anyone?) :-).
Consider Delphi Prism if you do like pascal language. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
;) Anyway, whatever the trend might goes, I already have
the solution: FPC and Lazarus. Maybe we can agree on this one. :D
> Sorry, but I can't help myself. I can hardly think of a significant web app
> I have enjoyed using.
Ah, unlucky you. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeog
ct each other decision to whether go web or not.
Let's assume s/he knows what s/he is doing and the consequences. Now,
let's stop this web-or-desktop things and focus again to the topic of
this thread. Agree?
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
haXe
since it directly produces native code from *pascal* code, both for
server and client side.
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
er, join also with ExtPascal project. :D Both Powtils (with its
PasJS) and ExtPascal (with its FCGI) have good future if both
development isn't stalled or have more support from other pascal
developers. :(
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
a and GWT.
> I have never heard of Powtils but will take a look at it.
It's yet another CGI library for Pascal. You may check it out from
http://powtils.googlecode.com. It used to be known as Pascal Server
Page.
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
_
web programming is only can be done
using PHP, ASP, or Java. :(
> Why does one need to translate from Pascal to Java ?
We're talking about JavaScript, not Java. And Java <> JavaScript
though both has similar name and syntax.
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ograph
support event-driven programming (can be
started as Lazarus plugin?).
- (optional) tool to convert desktop application into web application
utilizing all the above features.
So, most of them are already available though partially and
separately. If there would be a voluntary but dedicated develo
ely running under browser using JS (no flash,
no plugins, no applets, no server side logic is required). But it's
common to see it or other kind of games under browser nowadays (with
most or all of game logic resides on the browser side).
--
-Bee-
x27;ll end up writing
JS directly instead of continuing the PasJS compiler development. This
case that happened to Script# project (C# to JS compiler). :D
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
;s get back on to the topic of this thread. :)
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
including cross-browser support. For further development, we
could extend PasJS to use ExtJS UI framework as the default LCL-like
library.
Ideas? TIA.
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
http://www.anime.cz/skola/pj/
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>> http://www.anime.cz/skola/pj/
> Unfortunately written in javascript, and not a very good one at that.
Yes. Nevertheless, it could become another reference for one who want
to build another pascal to js compiler/converter. ;)
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.word
> How safe is it to deploy such an executable to a wide variety of computers
> out there.
ExtPascal is more for server side application. You should know where
it will be deployed and you can set more appropriate options. ;)
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpre
elphi. But, is it possible in FPC? Using the
above construct, I always got an 'Internal error 200501152' message.
Is it a bug or something?
FYI I'm using FPC v.2.2.5 on Mac. TIA.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeo
> The internal error is due to the fact that your {$if ...} construct appears
> right after your uses clause: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=8611
So, it's a bug. Since 2007? :(
Thanks for the hint. I'll find a workaround for that. Any suggestion? TIA.
--
-Bee-
...makin
the {$if ...} expression would help?
That's what came first to my mind. I'll try it out. TIA.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fp
http://wp.me/puJY-7N
No flame intended. Maybe it's time to take some actions on speed
optimization since some managed/interpreted languages had beaten FPC
out of the water. :)
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
ed to run the query. If I remove the
where clause (no date check), the query would run fine. That's why it
confused me since I don't know what's wrong with it.
Any hints? Or is it sqldb's bug? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
__
Nevertheless, it's MySQL that reports the error.
Yes. But what did sqlDB do to the query so mysql didn't accept it?
Please set 'ParseSQL' to false and see if that helps ?
Yes, it helps. Thank you.
What does ParseSQL do anyway? What are the benefit of it?
-Bee-
has
sqlDB? Defining "port=3307"
or "-P 3307" on params property seems to be ignored. Using "hostname:port"
on hostname property is also not working. Thanks for the help.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
_
_connect
is hardcoded to only use default port (0 for the sixth argument).
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
tion class on FPC 2.0.2, Ubuntu Feisty, mySQL 5.0.
I don't consider 2.0.2 as such an old version since v.2.2 is just released a
few days ago. Had sqlDB on FPC 2.2 have port property?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
y the TStrings
class.
TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ped to Cee procedures. That's all.
Understood. But newbies or newcomers won't write the wrappers by
themselves in the first place unless it's already provided by the tool
(fpc).
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
e.", and
"content". "123abc." is ignored since it contains numbers.
The document may contain more than one article. Counting is done through
out all articles found.
My program (using TStrings) requires about 0.4s to process the given
nits/library or
non standard attempt here since it'd require extra effort, especially
for newbies or newcomers (to FPC).
Of course, I know I can beat Perl using my own optimized TStrings
written in assembler by hand mixed by pascal syntax. But, that's not the
point. ;)
-Bee-
or at least
equal. That way we could be more "independent". ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
upgrade to fpc 2.2.0 for some particular reasons. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
y good, I won't use pascal (especially fpc) at the first
place. :-P
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
0.204s
sys 0m0.004s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ time ./koleksi2
Word count:126944
Unique word count:11793
real0m0.452s
user0m0.432s
sys 0m0.016s
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
program (using fpc and the
default TStringList), but still about 40% slower than Perl. Plus, the
program depends on PCRE library. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
AMD-K6-700 / SuSE-10.3 / Linux-2.6.22 / perl-5.8.8 / fpc-2.2.0
Probably because the different fpc version, no? I'm using fpc 2.0.4.
However, this is a good news. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-p
fpc v.2.0.4! :((
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Vincent said it was 3 times faster. I expected the result would be about
0.10s. Or am I wrong?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman
ascal program.
Alright everyone. The answers are enough. Now I can say confidently that
pascal (fpc v.2.2) is FASTER than Perl, including in text processing. ;)
Thank you very much to everyone who involves in this thread. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpres
(atm not good enough)
B: if it uses Jeff's header translations for pcre
I prefer it would use fpc own regexpr unit instead of using other
language libraries. IMO, it'd show the power of pascal (fpc) by itself. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography
Sure, but as Jonas pointed out it is better to use a good library than
the write a bad library yourself.
And someone would claim that the speed comes from the library (c?), not
from pascal. :P It's a LANGUAGE shootout btw, not LIBRARY shootout.
Maybe you had forgotten that. ;)
-Bee-
regepxr unit,
another using pcre. This way we would also implicitly/indirectly
compares regepxr performance between fpc own regexpr against other
libraries, besides the good interoperability of fpc. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
Well, considering that perl's or Python's speed greatly rely on the
underlying C-implementation of (at least) particular functionality, all
those comparisons basically boil down to C vs. C, anyway. Or don't
they?
Exactly! That's why I prefer to use fpc own regexpr
first place, gcc on the second. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
) but reject some other updates/fixes, then what should I
do? SVN seems to get ALL updates/fixes.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/lis
know I shouldn't use new development release (v.2.3.1) for production
use since it contains new features that perhaps still not fully tested
or buggy.
TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
e are situations
or conditions where some programmers prefer to use his own custom but
readable and maintainable parsing code over regex cryptic syntax.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
uld I report this to mantis?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Yes, but afaik there already is one. Walk the database component bugreports
to find out.
I found 0010148 and 0009763 are related to my problem. Can we have the
patch back-ported to 2.2.1?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
Just note in the related reports that in your relevant branch (2.2.1 + exact
svn revision) the problem still persists.
Done: 0010272
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
No, this is a new bug report, not the related reports. :-)
Because I can't add notes to existing bug report. I can't even relate
them. No input controls available for that purpose. :( Or am I missing
something? *I told you I'm new to mantis system* :D
-Bee-
has Bee.o
entEvent));
XCloseDisplay(Display);
end.
-8<--- pascal code end ---8<
Using fpc 2.2.1 on Ubuntu Gutsy i386.
TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Ok, I give up. :-D
Actually I don't! :-D
Clientevent.Data.l[1] := TTime(0);
After dug xlib tutorials, I found the above line is the trouble maker!
It should set to current time instead of zero. Now, it works perfectly!
Thanks. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
compressed)
Can we provide this file on fpc's doc ftp?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi all,
Is it just me or above methods are indeed not mentioned within fpc's doc
2.2.0? Any texts that are supposed to be a link to above methods is not
formed as a link.
Just to make sure, before I'll report this to mantis as a "bug". :)
-Bee-
has
This is documentation generated with fpc 2.3.1 source code.
Ah, there must be something wrong with fpc 2.2.0 generated documentation. :(
BTW... where can I download laz 9.24 documentation? I'd like to convert
them to chm format as well. Just like what I did to fpc doc 2.2.0. :)
-Bee-
I have documentation of those at:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/system/stringfunctions.html
Yes, they are there on fpc doc for fpc 2.0.4. But when I open fpc doc on
fpc 2.2.0, the detail pages of those routines are gone.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/stringfunctions.html
That's exactly what I got. Notice that those 3 routines I mentioned are
not formed as link to further explanation.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpres
At revision 13162.
I'm using Ubuntu Gutsy on i386.
Hints? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Revert the file $(FPCDIR)\packages\paszlib\src\zstream.pp to revision 9290
Sorry if I sound silly, but how to revert to specific rev number? svn
revert command doesn't expect a number. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpres
out of topic. I'm new to
svn system. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ts to
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_2
Is it correct?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I do make heavy use of OOP in
FPC, especially the FCL. It it means the last, then I no longer touch
this object paradigm since I used Delphi. ;)
These are important questions, because I want to bring
newcomers up to speed with the tools and OSes they're
most likely to use as they get
What forum would be best for me to join to discuss how to rewrite the
book for FP?
This list, no? :-D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org
GUI. If it happens,
I'll be confidently using fpGUI. ;)
Congratulations and thanks for the great work of you (and your team). :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
No offense, but maybe this is a good time to start becoming a serious
developer now?
No offense, but maybe this is a good time to start providing a serious
namespace to FPC now? ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc
of specific logic.
I used to use this feature on Turbo Delphi Explorer. But since I totally
switch to FPC/Laz and Ubuntu, I really missed this feature on FPC. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist
ust the RTL and FCL. :-D
Can you show me which files I need to look and learn in order to have
this feature? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
