A. That is not a problem. A couple of other, non-c participants use pcre.
I myself would consider them lacks of the language advantage on their own.
B. The same is done with pidigits. C. It shows that fpc has good interoperability.
We could submit more than one programs, one using fpc own regepxr unit, another using pcre. This way we would also implicitly/indirectly compares regepxr performance between fpc own regexpr against other libraries, besides the good interoperability of fpc. ;)
-Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
