Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23.58, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > So this makes your case, doesn't it. Martin argued that his dataset was > > > designed to work together with his visual controls. > > > > Yes, but it's an important part, because exactl

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23.58, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > So this makes your case, doesn't it. Martin argued that his dataset was > > designed to work together with his visual controls. > > Yes, but it's an important part, because exactly this is the part that > has changed. Except from this an

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:27 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote: > Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote: > >> Joost van der Sluis wrote: > >>> Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? > >>> > >> To me it seems that benchmar

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Coco Pascal
Joost van der Sluis wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote: Joost van der Sluis wrote: Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance more and more.

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Coco Pascal
Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal: Joost van der Sluis wrote: Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance more and more. I'm interested in re

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal: > Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? > > > > > To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance > more and more. > I'm interested in responsiveness in n-tie

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote: > Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? > > > To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing > relevance more and more. Offcourse, but it has some usefull

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Coco Pascal
Joost van der Sluis wrote: Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance more and more. I'm interested in responsiveness in n-tier solutions: opening connection - begin transaction - queri

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Micha Nelissen
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >> Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status > > Why not simply use heaptrc ? It prints a summary ? Or even GetFPCHeapStatus.MaxHeapUsed. Micha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.or

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Vincent Snijders wrote: > Joost van der Sluis schreef: > > > > If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible, > > the shootout ppl also do this. > > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#memory > > Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status Why n

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Vincent Snijders
Joost van der Sluis schreef: If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible, the shootout ppl also do this. http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#memory Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maill

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:41 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that > > msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it > > doesn't

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:40 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did > > some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results) > > > [...] > > > I t

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did > > some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results) > > > [...] > > > I tried to exp

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > Hi all, > > > I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that > msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it > doesn't do that. (see my mails on this subject) > > I think that the only reasonable

Re: [fpc-pascal] msedb and fcl-db benchmarks

2007-07-17 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > Hi all, > > To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did > some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results) > [...] > I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that > msedb conv