On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hi all, > > > I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that > msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it > doesn't do that. (see my mails on this subject) > > I think that the only reasonable explanation is the argument from > Michael: using ansistrings/pointers to store the data instead of storing > them directly into a buffer, induces so much overhead that it becomes > too slow. > > Overall, I would conclude that the current design of the TBufDataset of > fcl-db is a better choice then the design of tmseBufDataset. Since fcl- > db is faster on those things a TBufDataset is build/meant for: browsing > through records. > > Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? How about memory usage ? That is my main concern. Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
