On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:41 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that > > msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it > > doesn't do that. (see my mails on this subject) > > > > I think that the only reasonable explanation is the argument from > > Michael: using ansistrings/pointers to store the data instead of storing > > them directly into a buffer, induces so much overhead that it becomes > > too slow. > > > > Overall, I would conclude that the current design of the TBufDataset of > > fcl-db is a better choice then the design of tmseBufDataset. Since fcl- > > db is faster on those things a TBufDataset is build/meant for: browsing > > through records. > > > > Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked? > > How about memory usage ? That is my main concern.
If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible, the shootout ppl also do this. Joost _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
