Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 100000 records are missing relevance
more and more.
I'm interested in responsiveness in n-tier solutions: opening connection -
begin transaction - quering/updating mostly 1 or a few records - commit
transaction - close connection - browsing a small (<50) set of records .
Opening /closing connections could be skipped in this context when a
connectionpool is used. Also I'm interested in tests
selecting/updating/browsing sets larger than 1 million records, obviously
local.
Consequently one could ask if one type of dataset could satisfy requirements
regarding performance and use of resources in both cases.
While relevant for many software, connect and disconnet are largely
uninterresting, as opening a connection per query scales very bad.
Properly designed software uses connection pooling; representative
benchmarks should assume well designed software.
I already stated that, or am I missing your point?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
