I am curious,
Has anyone benchmarked the new AMD Ryzen vs Intel chips with
FreePascal. 10 years or so ago, I had a multi core AMD Desktop and an
Intel based laptop. With FreePascal the laptop was outperforming the
desktop. When I upgraded that machine, I upgraded to Intel since I use
FreePascal
> Allowing that he used FPC 2.2.0, is optimisation etc. likely to have
improved enough that somebody could usefully suggest he rerun the test?
Upgrading his tools would be better, they're waaay to old. However, for
FPC, I'd like to see when the next stable release comes out. There are new
op
At http://www.fourmilab.ch/fbench/fbench.html John Walker, formerly of
Autodesk, rates FPC as one of the faster languages but remarks "To the
best of my knowledge, none of the language implementations tested
exploit the thread-level parallelism implemented in modern processors."
Allowing that
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently come across some good websites about benchmarks and Free
> Pascal is definitevely one of the best compilers in CPU time and
> Memory Use on batteries of problems.
That's a known page, Ales Katona works on improving the results.
>
> O
Hello,
I've recently come across some good websites about benchmarks and Free
Pascal is definitevely one of the best compilers in CPU time and
Memory Use on batteries of problems.
On Linux:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
"How can we benchmark a programming language?
We can't - we benchmark
