Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently come across some good websites about benchmarks and Free > Pascal is definitevely one of the best compilers in CPU time and > Memory Use on batteries of problems.
That's a known page, Ales Katona works on improving the results. > > On Linux: > > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ > > "How can we benchmark a programming language? > We can't - we benchmark programming language implementations. > > How can we benchmark language implementations? > We can't - we measure particular programs." > > Free Pascal vs C#: > > Mono is ~15 times worse in memory use and execution speed. > > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=fpascal&lang2=csharp&sort=fullcpu > > Free Pascal vs Java JDK: FPC wins by large =P > > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=fpascal&lang2=java&sort=fullcpu > > Free Pascal vs C: GCC is the only compiler to beat FPC, and for a small > margin. > > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=fpascal&lang2=gcc&sort=fullcpu > > On Windows: > > http://dada.perl.it/shootout/ That's outdated (FPC 1.0.4). > > Delphi comes even with Visual Studio c and c++ on the first place. > After, with a margin, comes gcc and free pascal. C#, Java, perl, > python, all come much after free pascal. Visual Basic is perhaps the > worse. > > It is obvious that all benchmarks are flawed (as even the benchmark > website says), but it is lot's of fun ^_^ > > -- > Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal