> Allowing that he used FPC 2.2.0, is optimisation etc. likely to have improved enough that somebody could usefully suggest he rerun the test?
Upgrading his tools would be better, they're waaaaaaay to old. However, for FPC, I'd like to see when the next stable release comes out. There are new optimizations that could give noticable improvement. -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-are-odious-but-tp5720669p5720670.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
