At http://www.fourmilab.ch/fbench/fbench.html John Walker, formerly of Autodesk, rates FPC as one of the faster languages but remarks "To the best of my knowledge, none of the language implementations tested exploit the thread-level parallelism implemented in modern processors."

Allowing that he used FPC 2.2.0, is optimisation etc. likely to have improved enough that somebody could usefully suggest he rerun the test?

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to