On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23.58, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > So this makes your case, doesn't it. Martin argued that his dataset was
> > designed to work together with his visual controls.
>
> Yes, but it's an important part, because exactly this is the part that
> has changed. Except from this an
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:27 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
> Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
> >> Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >>> Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
> >>>
> >> To me it seems that benchmar
> On 7/12/07, Arjan van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and use gdb instead of the Freepascal debugger?
>
> AFAIK Free Pascal uses gdb on most platforms.
Yes and no. The IDE has "a" GDB in library form integrated. It doesn't use
the "gdb" binary.
__
> Tom Walsh schrieb:
> > Is there a compelling reason NOT to use GNU make for the fpc projects?
>
> Main problem: you can't express the cyclic interdependencies pascal
> units can have.
- Having to ship an external binary (or on *nix lay a dependancy).
- Expansion (more syntax/commands) mostly v
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing
relevance more and more.
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance
more and more.
I'm interested in re
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal:
> Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
> >
> >
> To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance
> more and more.
> I'm interested in responsiveness in n-tie
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
> Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
> >
> To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing
> relevance more and more.
Offcourse, but it has some usefull
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing
relevance more and more.
I'm interested in responsiveness in n-tier solutions: opening connection
- begin transaction - queri
Hello,
I have compiled a DLL under Win64. It's a UDF-library for Firbird 2.1.
Under Linux 64bit all things are working, only in WIN64 not.
The problem is that Firebird says that he cannot find the Entry Point of
each of my functions.
It's not a Firebird problem, i have made a test application who
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status
>
> Why not simply use heaptrc ? It prints a summary ?
Or even GetFPCHeapStatus.MaxHeapUsed.
Micha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.or
Irawan Tanudirdjo schrieb:
> Dear all,
>
> Today, when I try to use Windows Common Control in
> FPC, well I got error, and when I check in FPC
> installation folder, I cannot found the implementation
> for CommCtrl.o or CommCtrl.pp either. And also in last
> week email, someone mentioned that WinS
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Joost van der Sluis schreef:
> >
> > If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible,
> > the shootout ppl also do this.
>
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#memory
>
> Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status
Why n
Joost van der Sluis schreef:
If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible,
the shootout ppl also do this.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#memory
Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maill
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:41 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that
> > msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it
> > doesn't
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:40 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
> > some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
> >
> [...]
>
> > I t
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
and hello.exe actually runs at the other side of the fence.
Note that you can install Wine (I'm not sure though how the Darwin port
hasprogressed) to do testing. With Wine you can do the full development
without a Windows
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
lazarus.pp(118,1) Error: resource compiler not found, switching to external
mode
Can you try -vt to see if and in what directories the compiler tries to
search windres?
It could very well be that the compiler searches for
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
> lazarus.pp(118,1) Error: resource compiler not found, switching to external
> mode
Can you try -vt to see if and in what directories the compiler tries to
search windres?
It could very well be that the compiler searches for windres.exe, this
wou
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Then simply compile your program:
fpc -Fu/path/to/fpc/rtl/units/i386-win32 -Twin32 myprogram.pas
Happy crosscompiling!
This is how far I got with the crosscompiler:
[p17:~/fpc/svn/lazarus] adriaan% make OS_TARGET=win32
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.3.1 [2007/0
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
> > some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
> >
> [...]
>
> > I tried to exp
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that
> msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it
> doesn't do that. (see my mails on this subject)
>
> I think that the only reasonable
On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
> some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
>
[...]
> I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that
> msedb conv
23 matches
Mail list logo
