On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> > The code exists and has been revamped a few times in response to reviews,
> > but I'm not sure whether there are actually any assigned resources for
> > p
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:49 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 4 September 2011 21:44, Michael Dale wrote:
>
> > It will be a lot easier to import from YouTube once Timed media handler
> adds support for webm to commons. If you check out the wikivideo-l and
> commons lists for some recent example YouT
(I'm not sure offhand if I'm set up to cross-post to Foundation-l; if this
doesn't make it, somebody please CC a mention if necessary. Thanks!)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, aude wrote:
> Aside from the very real privacy issue, YouTube videos can disappear at any
> time. I would much rather w
ant to being able to tell
which part of your document is which.
And heck, even if not everything gets fixed along that kind of path, just
being able to *have* pages and other resource types that *are*
well-structured mixed into the system is going to be hugely useful for the
non-Wikipedia projects
My current thoughts are to concentrate on a few areas:
1) create a widget/gadget/template/extension/plugin model built around
embedding blocks of information within a larger context...
2) ...where the data and rendering can be reasonably separate... (eg, not
having to pull tricks where y
I'm taking the liberty of putting foundation-l on temporary moderation.
Seriously, guys -- take the "who's a bigger jerk" threads offlist.
The regular list mods may reconfigure any way they like once they wake up.
-- brion vibbe
On 10/9/09 11:33 AM, Gregory Kohs wrote:
> Brion says:
>
> ++
>
> A few thousand dollars in rent for the Usability Initiative's space...
>
> ++
>
> It may be equally accurate to say that I have earned "a few thousand
> dollars" this year, or in my lifetime, or that comprises the bud
On 10/8/09 7:27 PM, Gregory Kohs wrote:
> Erik,
>
> How much of WMF's expenses went to Wikia, Inc. this year so far?
A few thousand dollars in rent for the Usability Initiative's space,
which will end soon thanks to Wikimedia getting larger office space of
their own.
You might perhaps remember
On 10/2/09 11:45 AM, Steven Walling wrote:
> Andrew, do you think LiquidThreads is stable enough for production
> deployment on a much smaller wiki, such as like less than 1,000 pages?
> The Portland WikiWednesday has a small MediaWiki install, and a couple years
> ago we had David demo LiquidThrea
On 10/2/09 1:21 AM, Aphaia wrote:
> Brion,
>
> congrats on your new opportunity and project and I'm bit on a relief
> to hear you would like to stay on our community, and I still remember
> the days you was a volunteer developer with great devotion (in those
> days e sta
On 9/28/09 5:27 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/9/29 Brion Vibber:
>> It seems to work just fine, actually. The extension is on, the
>> configuration is being loaded for the right database, and things seem to
>> function when I test them.
>>
>> Quick steps to try i
On 9/28/09 5:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> It seems to work just fine, actually. The extension is on, the
>> configuration is being loaded for the right database, and things seem to
>> function when I test them.
>
> Holy crap!
>
> In my defense:
> It's pretty clear that no one was aware that it
On 9/28/09 5:19 PM, Jimmy Wales wrote:
> Brion Vibber wrote:
>> On 9/28/09 5:15 PM, Jimmy Wales wrote:
>>> I also forwarded this to the English Wikipedia mailing list...
>>
>> Yay! :)
>>
>> Also added on the tech blog:
>>
>> http://techblog.
On 9/28/09 5:15 PM, Jimmy Wales wrote:
> I also forwarded this to the English Wikipedia mailing list...
Yay! :)
Also added on the tech blog:
http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/09/flaggedrevs-test-wiki-awaits-you/
-- brion
___
foundation-l mailing lis
On 9/28/09 4:57 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Switching it in for thie page to "The stable revision; if not present,
> then the current/draft one", I now see the little 'sighted' box on the
> article page and have the review interface at the bottom (though some of
> th
On 9/28/09 4:57 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> 3) "This page does not have a stable version; page stability settings
> can be configured."<- click this link [ideally that next form will be
> better integrated into the protection form in future]
>
> http://flaggedrevs.la
On 9/28/09 4:18 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On 9/28/09 1:04 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> plan, and Brion is hoping to invest some of his remaining time with it
>>> in helping to get the extension
On 9/28/09 1:04 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> [snip]
>> plan, and Brion is hoping to invest some of his remaining time with it
>> in helping to get the extension ready for en.wp. It's not trivial: The
>> scalability concerns at that size are a
On 9/28/09 2:23 PM, Domas Mituzas wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> And you'll still have commit access, so I
>> hope to keep seeing "Revert rXXX, totally broken"
>
> Don't be so harsh on Brion, not every commit of his has been totally
> broken :-)
*reverts domas* :)
-- brion
___
On 9/28/09 12:56 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Thomas Daltonwrote:
>
>> I was really looking forward to you handing over the
>> administrative part of your job and concentrating on coding, great
>> things would have happened, I'm sure!
>
>
> No reason he can't keep coding.
On 9/28/09 12:53 PM, Sage Ross wrote:
> As Kat Walsh alluded to on ... Facebook?!?... free/libre real-time
> services are more important than a lot of Wikimedians think (because
> we've spent so long pushing back against "merely" social uses of our
> wikis?). In the grand scheme of the things we c
ct for WMF tech
management issues starting October 12, until the new CTO is hired. I'll
support the hiring process as much as I can, and we're hoping to have a
candidate in the door by the end of the year.
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO, Wikimedia Foundation
San Francisco
_
On 9/24/09 6:40 PM, Az1568 wrote:
> [LocalisationUpdate deployment delayed] - The deployment of
> LocalisationUpdate, an extension meant to keep the localized messages
> as up to date as possible, was delayed after it killed the entire
> site. You don't have to be a tech to interpret the blog post
On 9/16/09 11:33 AM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> LSS2RSS is srs bsns!
>
> A blog could work; in the meantime, I started an identi.ca account:
> http://identi.ca/listsummaryservice/
> Feel free to follow it or its feed
> (http://identi.ca/listsummaryservice/all/rss) for all your rss needs.
Spiffy!
Here'
On 9/11/09 12:45 PM, Pavlo Shevelo wrote:
>> Isn't temporarily blocking such a user a way to calm him/her down? I
> Yes it might be the way, but far not universal way.
> And it should be the last (ultimate) in moderator toolkit, far not the
> first to be used.
The fundamental mechanism of moderati
May I respectfully suggest that further discussion on this thread be
taken offlist until new arguments come to light which have not already
been posted?
-- brion
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists
On 9/9/09 9:41 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> As Erik points out, at a certain point we have to actually write new
> code to support new ideas. Else "projects we could do at Wikimedia"
> becomes "projects we can do with a wiki engine."
IMO we need to do that for the projects we already have before we t
On 9/8/09 3:56 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/9/8 Pedro Sanchez:
>> Geographical/atlas/map kind ofproject
>>
>> granted, there's wikimapia and other external equivalents
>> but we (Wikimedia) are lacking it
>
> Is there any point us doing something that already exists? What would
> be better about
On 9/4/09 3:27 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Tim Starlingwrote:
>>
>> Chad's analysis was correct. The SF staff have been looking for a new
>> office for some time, and last I heard they were in the process of
>> negotiating a lease on a prospective space. Subletting the old
On 9/4/09 1:01 AM, Bod Notbod wrote:
> 2. On many videos, if not most, it is impossible to see the content of
> the slides. Could videos be uploaded in higher resolution? Obvious
> downsides: larger file size, more bandwidth required. Or maybe all
> presenters could be encouraged to upload their pr
On 8/28/09 2:49 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
>
>
>> Robert, is it possible to share the source for generating the
>> revert-based stats with other folks who may be interested in pursuing
>> further work on the su
er hand is good. It seems to
> be better received by the community when WMF fulfills a modest
> expectation than when it reveals a wonderful surprise.
Under promise, over deliver. :)
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO & Senior Software Architect, Wikimedia Foundation
___
pedia already?
Robert, is it possible to share the source for generating the
revert-based stats with other folks who may be interested in pursuing
further work on the subject? Thanks!
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO & Senior Software Architect, Wikimedia Foundation
_
On 8/13/09 5:28 PM, Angela wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> "So— I tried 20 random words, and the WP result was lower in four of
>> them, the same in the rest."
>> "No pattern really... We still have the problem with "article at funny name;
>> redirect from comm
On 8/13/09 12:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> (I went on, on IRC, to point some examples of the behavioural change
> that happened towards the end of 2007 (per my cruddy memory) where
> non-widely-linked redirects basically fell out of the google index...
> search terms like "Jesus bug" or many oth
On 8/13/09 11:43 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Because we haven't had a chance to finish final review& fixups on it.
> Should be done in the next few days. (Why are there like 500 replies to
> this from people we've already talked to directly and know what's up?)
Quick st
Because we haven't had a chance to finish final review & fixups on it.
Should be done in the next few days. (Why are there like 500 replies to
this from people we've already talked to directly and know what's up?)
-- brion
___
foundation-l mailing lis
On 8/12/09 1:48 PM, Steven Walling wrote:
> Let me clarify: I'm not actually arguing that anything is wrong with the
> election system, the results, or having old hands on the Board. On the
> contrary. I'm just wondering if this election (even if it's not unusual)
> might be conflated with the PARC
On 8/12/09 6:18 AM, Chad wrote:
> Just thinking aloud here, but as to methods for accessing the content:
>
> A) Extends FileRepo to work with their data, however they happen to give
> us access to it
> B) Provide something similar to Special:Import, that will go retrieve their
> data and import it
On 8/12/09 12:07 PM, Steven Walling wrote:
> While I personally am very pleased with the results, I wonder how the
> election results will be perceived outside Wikimedia.
> With numerous media outlets reacting to PARC's research about the state of
> the community, I fear this endorsement of seeming
On 8/11/09 2:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Kudos to the WMF for avoiding gratuitous reader tracking. Other
> people *are* paying attention to the privacy implications of this kind
> of user-invisible behavior.
Yay!
Quick note: the only sort of user tracking that we would be interested
in doin
On 8/7/09 5:43 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> I suspect you're going to have to be prepared to do a lot of internal
> discovery and discovery with potential hires to show them the web ops
> side - it's not well documented now (I keep meaning to find out more
> about the ops team and finding I have no
On 8/7/09 3:39 PM, James Forrester wrote:
> 2009/8/7 Brion Vibber:
>> On 8/7/09 3:06 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> It's not just about resumes, it's also about being taken seriously
>>> when communicating with others. A "Head Software Architect" w
On 8/7/09 2:35 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> By containing the magic words "senior" and "architect" the proposed
> "Senior Software Architect" is, in my experience, not inconsistent
> with industry naming practice for the most important tech guru who
> isn't primarily a manager.
>
> It's not a bad t
On 8/7/09 3:06 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> It's not just about resumes, it's also about being taken seriously
> when communicating with others. A "Head Software Architect" will
> probably be taken more seriously than a "Senior Software Architect",
> since the former shows you are the boss, that latt
On 8/7/09 11:12 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> I think this is a fantastic idea. I think the biggest problem the tech
> side of the WMF has had over the last year or two has been
> prioritisation and splitting the job like this should help that no
> end.
>
> I'm curious - would the Senior Software Arch
On 8/7/09 12:25 AM, private musings wrote:
> actually - might a WMF 'code of conduct' for projects be a good idea? (as in
> something perhaps a dollop more pragmatic than 'comply with our mission
> statement'!) - sounds like an idea for the strategy wiki... :-)
I'd say yes, but that a "code of con
idate to fill the CTO position (full job description will go up
soon), at which point I'll be freed up to concentrate on being a
full-time Senior Software Architect. (Yes, I'll review your patch!)
I will of course continue to work closely with our eventual CTO... the
idea is to find some
else needs cleaning up in recent changes channels,
interwiki links, or other output.
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
Cetateanu Moldovanu wrote:
> *Hi, I want to remind you that on 26 Nov 2008
> **http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html**
>
Hay (Husky) wrote:
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020620.html
>
> Unfortunately OGG Theora didn't make it as the default codec for the
> HTML5 element in the spec. Until one of the two major formats
> (Theora and H264) is clearly the major format the HTML5 spec wi
El 5/28/09 1:56 PM, Kat Walsh escribió:
> Another step towards an open web -- Google's Chrome browser is going
> to support Theora video natively with the HTML5 video tag:
> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/05/google-chrome-3-adds-html5.html
> http://codereview.chromium.org/115625/diff/1/2
El 5/14/09 3:16 PM, private musings escribió:
> - Commons currently hosts many pictures, taken in a public place, without
> the apparent permission of the subject, of various folk in various states
> of
> undress (think topless women at the beach as the best example) - I think
> th
ntent for children.
>
> -Mike
>
> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 10:29 -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
>
>> Slippery-slope arguments aside, it seems unfortunate that as creators of
>> "educational resources" we don't actually have anything that's being
>> cr
El 5/14/09 11:50 PM, David Gerard escribió:
> 2009/5/14 Oldak Quill:
>
>> I post the suggestion above about tagging articles that may be
>> considered inappropriate by some, because it is better to give people
>> tools to block content if they choose to, than to delete content on
>> that basis.
>
>
El 5/14/09 7:31 PM, Thomas Dalton escribió:
> 2009/5/14 Robert Rohde:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Thomas Dalton
>> wrote:
>>> 2009/5/14 Fred Bauder:
I suggest that Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not include Wikipedia is not a
manual of sexual practices. It could be phrased Wikipedi
El 5/8/09 9:21 PM, phoebe ayers escribió:
> About this: on en:wp, at least, under user preferences/gadgets, users
> can turn this on themselves by clicking the "Add an [edit] link for
> the lead section of a page" box. Is there any particular reason not to
> turn this on by default for everyone? Co
El 5/7/09 5:36 PM, geni escribió:
> 2009/5/8 Brian:
>> This usability study is so tiny. I want MediaWiki to be really, really good.
>> Please tell me you guys hope to go large scale with the remote testing
>> setup.
>
> Nit just mediawiki. Looks like we need to improve the paths through
> the help
was stuck
so long making their decision! :) Here's holding out for 2011 and 2012...
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO, Wikimedia Foundation
San Francisco
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
f our visitors without causing problems for others. If you have
technical suggestions for alternate implementations, they're welcome in
a more relevant channel such as wikitech-l.
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO, Wikimedia Foundation
San Francisco
_
03/22/open-letter-call-for-major-websites-to-opt-out-of-phorm/
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
Original Message
Subject: Phorm opt-out for Wikipedia.org and related domains
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:28:11 -0700
From: Brion Vibber
To: website-exclus...@webwise.com
On 4/16/09 7:21 AM, Magnus Manske wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, geni wrote:
>> 2009/4/1 Ryan Kaldari:
>>> Yes, but how many of them let you opt out? If we could opt out of the
>>> Great Firewall of China, I imagine we would :)
>> Most of these national firewalls limit the number of ISP
l experience) proposals.
[snip]
> For more information, see the Call for Papers:
> http://www.wikisym.org/ws2009/tiki-index.php?page=Call+for+Papers
Just a reminder to all that the CfP is still open for posters,
demonstrations, and WikiFest proposals -- the final deadline for these
is April 24
On 4/6/09 3:28 PM, Casey Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Cetateanu Moldovanu
> wrote:
>> * you have promised that subdomain name mo will become mo-cyrl, it's april
>> now and mo is still not yet renamed.*
>
> None of the wikis have been moved yet, it's not that this situation is
>
Soliciting feedback on Tor blocking settings... Please comment on
wikitech-l or the tech blog if possible to centralize discussion but
we'll keep an eye out on these lists too. :)
http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/04/planning-to-tighten-torblock-restrictions/
-- brion
On 3/25/09 10:51 PM, Michael Snow wrote:
> Cary Bass wrote:
>> While the English Wiktionary community may or may not be satisfied
>> with the logo as-is, in the interest of maintaining a visual identity,
>> one logo has to be used across projects
> My impression is that the current split is a natur
w what we're working on and give
feedback before we push things out:
* http://techblog.wikimedia.org/
I'd very much like to make sure that we've got regular contacts among
the various project communities who can help coordinate with us on
features, bugs, and general thoughts whi
the beasts that run Wikipedia and her sister projects...
He'll be helping us out with operations, monitoring, and documentation
of our servers, making sure everything's running smoothly and improving
our responses to and anticipation of problems.
Welcome aboard, Fred!
--
On 2/23/09 5:31 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> Copying the Commons list.
>
> I am interested in hosting (and running some scripts on) copies of the
> commons media dump on offline regional servers for offline-reading
> purposes. This is difficult without an image dump.
Awesome -- can you work with an
On 2/22/09 4:49 AM, River Tarnell wrote:
> currently the dump process is a bit broken. what is the Foundation's position
> on this?
Well, you could have just asked me. :)
http://leuksman.com/log/2009/02/24/wikimedia-data-dump-update/
-- brion
___
fou
On 1/23/09 11:49 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> Could we have more detail, please, on the note that "Wikia matched the best
>> offer"? Were the other ten higher bidders also given the opportunity to
>> match the best offer? Why was Wikia chosen on a "second and adjusted offer"
>> basis, rather than
e, and a lot of service data that needs
to be monitored and digested... if you think you've got the chops for
it, send us your CV by the end of January!
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/System_Administrator
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO,
On 1/15/09 11:19 AM, Brian wrote:
> Chad,
>
> What more would you like me to do, specifically?
The first things that would help would be:
1) Stop looking to blame someone for past wrongs
2) Think of something that *would* actually help, and do that
When a discussion starts in a negative directio
provements into the live Wikipedia
environment and general MediaWiki releases over the course of the project.
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
CTO, Wikimedia Foundation
San Francisco
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.
On 12/24/08 3:31 PM, Brian wrote:
> I am still quite shocked at the amount of time the english wikipedia takes
> to dump, especially since we seem to have close links to folks who work at
> mysql. To me it seems that one of two things must be the case:
>
> 1. Wikipedia has outgrown mysql, in the se
On 1/4/09 5:19 PM, effe iets anders wrote:
> But was that connection close enough (even in the old days) to
> complain here about copyright violations there? I think Tim had a good
> point here :P
*nod*
The Wikimedia Foundation is not, and has never been, involved with Wikia
in a capacity which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brion Vibber wrote:
> Please see my reply on wikitech-l. :)
Archive link:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2008-December/040611.html
(Cross-posting is great for announcements, but trouble for
discussions... :D)
- -- brion
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please see my reply on wikitech-l. :)
- -- brion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAklBi9kACgkQwRnhpk1wk448zgCglH2kYGVgYK9OH86J1SSLPs0C
PrcAoN2WXXns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> Commons provides no benefit except for sharing the same picture to people
> who do not read / write English. They cannot possibly find pictures and
> consequently for them Commons is useless.
That's simply ridiculous.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Dennis During <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there not a record of what projects actually link to commons material? If
>> not, why not
>>
>
> There is none because nobody made one.
>
> There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, effe iets anders
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
>>
>> More then 10 billion page views per month... (or 3900 page views per second)
>
> 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[snip]
We're already aware of the UNICEF study & extensions and will be
reviewing them alongside other ongoing usability testing and development
projects throughout 2009.
- -- brion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dovi Jacobs wrote:
> Hi, we've entered December. Has my worry has come true, namely that
> interim discussion of localization would send the request to
> never-never land?
No, localization is not at issue here and never has been.
You're in the queue:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan wrote:
> Wow, someone had more than 10,000 edits in February of 2002.
That's probably "Conversion script". :)
- -- brion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> Do not forget the als.wikipedia.org. It stands for Alsatian, but the als
> code is the Tosk language. The "gsw" code is the code that should have been
> used.
> http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=gsw
Addin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raimond Spekking wrote:
> Another two candidates:
>
> 1) zh-yue -> yue. See bug 8217 and Names.php:
>
> 'yue' => '粵語', # Cantonese -- (bug 8217) yue instead of zh-yue,
> http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/codes.asp?order=639_3&letter=y
>
> 2) zh-min
aphy.
There was later a request to rename 'be-x-old' (using a non-standard
code) to 'be-tarask', a IANA-registered subtag which is rather more
descriptive. IMHO this change should not be terribly controversial -- if
we're not closing it, we may as well give it its offi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bence Damokos wrote:
> What I would like as well, if possible, is support from the technical side
> to have detailed as detailed statistics about the different currencies as
> there are for US dollar (e.g. the percentage of donations matching exactly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
effe iets anders wrote:
> Thank god that we have the Euro now, and don't have to choose between Dutch
> Guilder and Belgian Frank for Dutch... (same goes for German etc)
>
> More of a challange seems Spanish to me nowadays :)
>
> but, back to french:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dovi, you're already in the queue which is being worked through; should
be done within the next few days.
- -- brion
Dovi Jacobs wrote:
> Gerard, thank you for your kind comments. I think the system you have
> set up at Betawiki is extraordinary, and
89 matches
Mail list logo
