On 10/25/2011 2:57 PM, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
> You've made quite a few incorrect assumptions there.
>
> Of course Commons editors should be deciding which images are PD. But
> when there is a dispute, it makes no sense for people who don't even
> know what a derivative wo
Quick reminder that the appeal from the community could use some help. A
couple people have started so far. That's really great - thanks for helping
out.
Please take a couple minutes and share some thoughts. Send it around to
anyone who might be interested.
Thanks!
Megan
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the extra info. It would be great if a more extensive timeline
> could be entered into the actual information page. Dates I would be looking
> for:
>
> * When should translations be finished for the first batch
>
The first batch
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. wrote:
>
> > For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on
> English
> > Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
> > contains some further views and
I think it's relative (like everything, anyway)
When we were discussing about image filter I remember over one hundred-mails.
It was a good discussion. It would be hilarious if someone speak ''Hey
everybody, we exceed the thirty messages soft limit, let's end this discussion
right now.'' :P
S
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. wrote:
> For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English
> Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
> contains some further views and discussion. I have summarised my view that
> our illustrations, j
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
> >
> > There was a 30 post per person monthly "soft" limit on foundation-l.
> >
>
> My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
>
> Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
> my last post for this month.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Thomas Morton
wrote:
>
>> I think people who think have got the point, but we still have to "whack
> the mole" at trolls and endless griefers.
>
> I'm also annoyed at being characterised in this way by someone who has
> maintained only the barest level of civility
>
> There was a 30 post per person monthly "soft" limit on foundation-l.
>
My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
my last post for this month. FWIW I entirely agree that less vocal posters
may be put off by large
>> ...a deletion discussion among
>> non-professionals is not the proper way to determine the law.
>
> Neither is the opinion of a legal expert: That's the job of the courts.
Courts are the proper way to determine the law after the fact. But
this is a question of determining the law before the fa
emijrp, 25/10/2011 12:30:
> Looks like we have a big ally in the digitisation of public domain content
> issue[1]:
>
> "The Europeana Foundation has published a policy statement, the Public
> Domain Charter, to highlight the value of public domain content in the
> knowledge economy. It alerts Europ
Forwarding from Maarten Zeinstra (who is not subscribed to this list, I've
cc'd him):
I am not part of a European Wikimedia chapter. However, I am part of the
Europeana R&D team on intellectual property. Europeana published its Public
Domain Charter about a year ago and is steadily working towar
Yes,
Wikimedia Chapters (especially the Dutch - where they are based, and the
Swedish - who have a joint project with them) are working with Europeana in
a variety of ways. One example is how Wikimedia groups have hosted
hackathons using their open datasets and API and (independently) won a prize
f
Please note that this policy statement is dated May 2010, it does not
appear to be changed since then (hurray.)
Mathias
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Dear all;
Looks like we have a big ally in the digitisation of public domain content
issue[1]:
"The Europeana Foundation has published a policy statement, the Public
Domain Charter, to highlight the value of public domain content in the
knowledge economy. It alerts Europe's museums, libraries, ar
15 matches
Mail list logo
