Yes, I agree, and I certainly agree that a command queue would be a great
feature, especially for testing and debugging. I was really just trying to
make the case that it was worth the space to discuss it and got a bit
overly strident about that.
I also think that the design and prototyping issue
On 2/23/12 4:09 PM, "Scott Delamater" wrote:
>>
>> I challenge all readers here
>>
>> Tell me a single feature that Flex needs more than a good designing and
>> prototyping tool.
>
> ...
> Personally I'd prioritize and contribute to any of those long before I'd
> devote time to a WYSIWYG to
On 2/24/2012 7:09 AM, Scott Delamater wrote:
You could also refer to:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Apopularissues-panel
not exactly fair, data came before adobe OS-ed flex & announced dropping design
view from FB.
Thank's Om for this precision.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:09:53 -0800
> Subject: Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there is
> sufficient interest
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> Okay, I to
's not the Flash builder, it is the design view only,
> so, they first have to check if it is possible to give only the code of
> this part.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:56:23 -0800
> > Subject: Re: Adobe migh
>
> I challenge all readers here
>
> Tell me a single feature that Flex needs more than a good designing and
> prototyping tool.
>From an informal office poll of some of our engineers here at Shutterfly,
my thoughts included:
- A real collections API (@see
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/d
+1 from me as well. The design view does help especially when it comes to
quick prototypes.
Brian
On 2/23/12 4:56 PM, "Om" wrote:
>I am curious about what exactly would(may) be donated? Is it an Eclipse
>plugin? I heard someone mention that it is a Flex application. Can
>someone shed s
open-sourcing the Design View if there is
> sufficient interest
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> I am curious about what exactly would(may) be donated? Is it an Eclipse
> plugin? I heard someone mention that it is a Flex application. Can
> someone shed some light on t
I am curious about what exactly would(may) be donated? Is it an Eclipse
plugin? I heard someone mention that it is a Flex application. Can
someone shed some light on the specifics?
That said, +1 from me for open sourcing the Design View. I would love to
contribute in that area.
Thanks,
Om
20
When I asked to Deepa two days ago about the Design view, I had in mind, the
fact that, although I am an experienced Flex developer, I still use it, it is
very convenient for the drafts, as in companies, it is very handy and valuable
to present quick prototypes and finally it's a tool that can
+1
I would like a designer which can do quick preview of my items renderer and
help me to make adjustements.
2012/2/23 JP Bader
> +1 for Dmitri's follow through! Thank you!
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Dimitri k. wrote:
> > - Original Message - From: "Dimitri k."
> >>
> >> Sh
+1 for Dmitri's follow through! Thank you!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Dimitri k. wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Dimitri k."
>>
>> She said that Adobe hasn't thought about it because they didn't believe we
>> were interested, but she was thinking it could be a good idea.
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitri k."
She said that Adobe hasn't thought about it because they didn't believe we
were interested, but she was thinking it could be a good idea.
In fact, the Design View is a Flex app, so the community can easily
contribute to it, and legal scrubbing sho
+1 from my side ...
A quick reminder of my former post [1] ... I have created a petition
regarding
this issue for the "Design View" in Flash Builder and Flash Catalyst [2].
Discontinuing "Design View" in Flash Builder and Flash Catalyst means:
• This is bad news for all people who prefer to de
+1 of course
Il giorno 22 febbraio 2012 11:03, Dimitri k. ha scritto:
> After the discussion on the ML about the Design View, I thought it would
> be a good idea to ask Deepa at the Flex Paris meeting if Adobe could
> consider to open-source it after the removal from next version of Flash
> B
50-641-0031
Cell: 650-823-8699
From: Cortlandt Winters
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there is
sufficient interest
Hi Jeffrey,
If anything is more
Hi Jeffrey,
If anything is more frustrating than the Me 2's to expanding and improving
existing features it's the constant whining and noise about what adobe
could have done or isn't willing to do, or speculation about totally
throwing away the baby with the bathwate0,r or core framework features
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffry Houser"
This is a high traffic mailing list; so I get frustrated with the
occasional barrage of "me too/+1" non-vote-thread posts which add nothing
to any discussion.
I question how many of the people who want this are willing to put time
and effo
On 2/22/2012 11:41 AM, Dimitri k. wrote:
From: "Jeffry Houser"
I don't think any number of +1s will convince Adobe either way.
Honestly, I personally could care less about design view. It made
sense when Adobe wanted to make Flex the "new Visual Basic" and
accessible to anyone. I'm not
From: "Jeffry Houser"
I don't think any number of +1s will convince Adobe either way.
Honestly, I personally could care less about design view. It made sense
when Adobe wanted to make Flex the "new Visual Basic" and accessible to
anyone. I'm not sure if I would put effort to try to fulfi
My personal workflow wouldn't change if we had it, but I agree that it
is a useful piece of FB (especially for newer devs) and if we could
have it, then that would be terrific!
+1
JP
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> I don't think any number of +1s will convince Adobe e
I don't think any number of +1s will convince Adobe either way.
Honestly, I personally could care less about design view. It made
sense when Adobe wanted to make Flex the "new Visual Basic" and
accessible to anyone. I'm not sure if I would put effort to try to
fulfill that role, though.
+1
its essential for RAD , Design View is key to prototyping , getting things
up and running, source view is for tweaking and polishing, both are
essential in any modern RAD environment
+ 1000 really
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Iuri Pereira wrote:
> +1
>
> Iuri
>
>
> 2012/2/22 Arturo Alv
+1
Iuri
2012/2/22 Arturo Alvarado
>
> > Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting started
> > > Right, Design View is very important to learn the Flex components
> behaviours.
> > > +1
> > > Bruce Lane
>
> +1 Also
>
> Arturo Alvarado
>
>
> Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting started
> > Right, Design View is very important to learn the Flex components
> > behaviours.
> > +1
> > Bruce Lane
+1 Also
Arturo Alvarado
+1
On 2/22/12 9:38 AM, Eugene Diana wrote:
+1 on keeping DV alive
-Original Message-
From: Jason Batten [mailto:i...@jasonbatten.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 5:18 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there
is
+1 on keeping DV alive
-Original Message-
From: Jason Batten [mailto:i...@jasonbatten.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 5:18 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there
is sufficient interest
Another +1, it's
single button press that would show
them an accurate rendering of the page of source
they were viewing
-Original Message-
From: piter...@gmail.com
[mailto:piter...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Peter HO
Sent: 22 February 2012 10:28
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe might think o
+1 for design view.
On Feb 22, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Pepe wrote:
> +1 for Design View
>
> 2012/2/22 Dimitri k. :
>> After the discussion on the ML about the Design View, I thought it would be
>> a good idea to ask Deepa at the Flex Paris meeting if Adobe could consider
>> to open-source it after th
show
them an accurate rendering of the page of source
they were viewing
-Original Message-
From: piter...@gmail.com
[mailto:piter...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Peter HO
Sent: 22 February 2012 10:28
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing
the Design V
+1 for Design View
2012/2/22 Dimitri k. :
> After the discussion on the ML about the Design View, I thought it would be
> a good idea to ask Deepa at the Flex Paris meeting if Adobe could consider
> to open-source it after the removal from next version of Flash Builder.
> Frédéric Thomas, also on
+1 here. I would be willing to spend some time on the DV code.
Humberto
_
On 2/22/12 4:03 AM, "Dimitri k." wrote:
>After the discussion on the ML about the Design View, I thought it would
>be
>a good idea to ask Deepa at the Flex Paris meeti
Sorry, I knew those. I just wanted to say. Never mind...
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/2/22 Omar Gonzalez :
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pepe wrote:
>
>> Why does not Adobe contribute Flash Builder to Eclipse Foundation?
>> # Then it might support 64bit and Eclipse plug-in.
>>
>> Shigeru Nakagaki
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pepe wrote:
> Why does not Adobe contribute Flash Builder to Eclipse Foundation?
> # Then it might support 64bit and Eclipse plug-in.
>
> Shigeru Nakagaki
>
Simply because that wouldn't make them money. And Adobe is about making
money.
But, let's stay on topic,
On 22/02/2012 19:55, Pepe wrote:
Why does not Adobe contribute Flash Builder to Eclipse Foundation?
# Then it might support 64bit and Eclipse plug-in.
I guess its because they still want to sell Flash Builder :)
yours
Martin.
Why does not Adobe contribute Flash Builder to Eclipse Foundation?
# Then it might support 64bit and Eclipse plug-in.
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/2/22 Martin Heidegger :
> +0.9
>
> I agree that the design view would be nice - but only if it doesn't delay
> other contributions such as the compiler.
>
>
+0.9
I agree that the design view would be nice - but only if it doesn't
delay other contributions such as the compiler.
yours
Martin
+1 from me too.
Design view is very helpful when you wish to see different states of your
component.
- Saurabh
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:05 PM, David Arno wrote:
> +1 from me too. Even if we never make use of it, we'd be mad to decline
> such
> an offer.
>
> David.
>
>
--
Regards,
Saurabh
+9
+1 from me too. Even if we never make use of it, we'd be mad to decline such
an offer.
David.
+1
Design View is crucial to my work flow.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Dimitri k. wrote:
> After the discussion on the ML about the Design View, I thought it would
> be a good idea to ask Deepa at the Flex Paris meeting if Adobe could
> consider to open-source it after the removal from
If the DV source was donated I'd be willing to spend time on that. I have a
lot of ideas for improving the DV as I'm sure many of you do as well. As
much as I never liked DV, if we had the source I'd be interested in looking
to improve on it.
+1 for open sourcing DV! :)
--
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...
I add my vote to this thread. Even if most of us "experienced flexers"
don't use it very often, design view is useful for beginners and for mobile
application layouting.
+1 for me
Peter
On 22 February 2012 11:17, Jason Batten wrote:
> Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting star
+1 There is a lot of interest.
Also Flash Catalyst DV. The way it is able to create a skin component
classes from the design view is an important part of the learning process
for.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Jason Batten wrote:
> Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting start
Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting started
On 22/02/2012 6:14 PM, Bruce Lane wrote:
Right, Design View is very important to learn the Flex components behaviours.
+1
Bruce Lane
On 22 February 2012 11:11, Avinash Narayanan wrote:
I completely agree. I personally loved the d
> From: "Dimitri k."
> Subject: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there is
sufficient interest
>
> She concluded that the best thing to make it happen would be to show
> interrest for the open-sourcing of DV on this list.
>
That would definitely be very interesting. Will a
Right, Design View is very important to learn the Flex components behaviours.
+1
Bruce Lane
On 22 February 2012 11:11, Avinash Narayanan wrote:
> I completely agree. I personally loved the design view alot especially when
> I first started out since I had no idea what flex was all about. Its also
I completely agree. I personally loved the design view alot especially when
I first started out since I had no idea what flex was all about. Its also
brilliant for understanding the various containers, components etc from a
learning perspective. definitely a +1 from my side.
Thanks
Avinash Y
On
47 matches
Mail list logo
