I don't think any number of +1s will convince Adobe either way.
Honestly, I personally could care less about design view. It made
sense when Adobe wanted to make Flex the "new Visual Basic" and
accessible to anyone. I'm not sure if I would put effort to try to
fulfill that role, though.
On 2/22/2012 10:27 AM, Charles Monteiro wrote:
+1
its essential for RAD , Design View is key to prototyping , getting things
up and running, source view is for tweaking and polishing, both are
essential in any modern RAD environment
+ 1000 really
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Iuri Pereira<iuri...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Iuri
2012/2/22 Arturo Alvarado<art...@centraldcom.com>
Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting started
Right, Design View is very important to learn the Flex components
behaviours.
+1
Bruce Lane
+1 Also
Arturo Alvarado
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
