Re: How to prepare Apache Flex 5 to run in the new AVM in Flashplayer 12?

2012-11-15 Thread Jesus Barquin
I agree with Carlos. 2012/11/15 Antonio Ortiz > I agree with Carlos rovira. > That will be the best way to keep flex alive and better > > > > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:42:46 +0100 > > Subject: Re: How to prepare Apache Flex 5 to run in the new AVM in > Flashplayer 12? > > From: carlos.rov...@co

Re: Flex possible evolutions

2012-10-22 Thread Jesus Barquin
I think the most viable solution is to fork flex , remove the old code and target Stage3D. We have the current version to leverage legacy applications, but we need to target new platforms Even rewrite the all framework or fork another framework based on Stage3D is an option. anybody test the perfor

Re: Starling + Flex

2012-10-21 Thread Jesus Barquin
If flex can not be ported to Stage3D and Flash Player NEXT then Flex looks like a diying project. Because then ported it to JS seems imposible. 2012/10/21 aYo ~ > Considering the discussions on the various forums, it doesn't look very > promising > On Oct 21, 2012 3:59 PM, "sébastien Paturel"

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

2012-10-18 Thread Jesus Barquin
So... is there anybody at apache flex that can follow the flash runtime evolution??? I mean improving future apache flex compiler, because the runtime seems to be every day more and more far away from the apache flex way and I feel a little bit scared. 2012/10/18 Thibault Imbert > Hi Clint, > >

Re: Changing Flex rendering to abstract renderer

2012-03-24 Thread Jesus Barquin
+1 2012/3/24 Paw Suddergaard > That is an awesome initiative! > > Do you have a blog/twitter/xx where its possible to follow your work? > > /paw > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:41 AM, imagene...@gmail.com < > imagene...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > I am porting Flex to Starling with a fork of Starl