If flex can not be ported to Stage3D and Flash Player NEXT then Flex looks like a diying project. Because then ported it to JS seems imposible.
2012/10/21 aYo ~ <a...@binitie.com> > Considering the discussions on the various forums, it doesn't look very > promising > On Oct 21, 2012 3:59 PM, "sébastien Paturel" <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for the update, > > but why would it require a "fairly massive rewrite" exactly? > > when you say "I would look at that" about feathersui, you mean as an > > alternative to flex? > > > > its quite a bad news IMO. if flex can't "easely" target a new rendering > > layer like starling, which stay in an Adobe runtime, > > what is the future of flex as a multi platform framework, and especially > > as a mobile SDK? > > > > > > After discussing with Thibault and spending time working on this I've > >> determined that a fairly massive rewrite would be required. Shortly > after > >> they released http://feathersui.com/ and I will say that it is a nice > bit > >> of work. I would look at that. > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, sébastien Paturel > >> <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > >> Hi jonathan, > >>> What is the state of this very promising project? > >>> > >>> Le 14/06/2012 18:46, Jonathan Campos a écrit : > >>> > >>> Recently I've been getting aquatinted with Starling to see if it > could > >>> > >>>> work > >>>> with Flex. After a few days of playing I think that it is possible > but I > >>>> do > >>>> see the issues now and there is plenty of work that is necessary to > make > >>>> it > >>>> happen. > >>>> > >>>> To get things going I basically cut down the UIComponent (to the parts > >>>> that > >>>> I cared about), made a copy of the entire Flex framework (as many > >>>> interfaces rely on DisplayObject, etc), replaced them with Starling > >>>> classes, rebuilt some of the Spark primitives, and "adjusted" some of > >>>> the > >>>> starling classes to fit some of the Flash interfaces. > >>>> > >>>> At this point I'm definitely going to wait to get the 4.8 release out > >>>> before giving this more time but I think it is possible. I'm sure > other > >>>> developers are already aware of it but if we could make some new > >>>> interfaces > >>>> such as an IDisplayObject it would be much easier switching out > >>>> DisplayObject for a Starling DisplayObject. > >>>> > >>>> Just thinking out loud at this point. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > >
