neither did I
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:52 AM, James Roland Cabresos
wrote:
> I had one 4.6 license but didn't received such email.
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Kevo X Thomson >wrote:
>
> > This morning I received an email from Adobe titled "Your Adobe licensing
> > order has been processe
Accessibility as for the disabled, physically impaired ? No, I don't see
that as a hard requirement to start work on a port but something you would
try to add later when it becomes available.
The unclear implications of whether my flex as3 mobile app has a path
forward in this new context of as4
"but according to its new strategic shift it will be with the new gaming
runtime only! "
Do we know this to be true ?
On Oct 19, 2012 8:59 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
> Thanks Gordon for asking about the nature of Flex.
> Flex is a RIA sdk and not a gaming SDK, ok thats quite obvious.
>
> Bu
it.
>>> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>>> Here there is a good solution if you want to use as to create js apps
>>>
>>> http://www.jangaroo.net/home/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 October 2012 14:53, sébastien Paturel
>>&g
g drawback in the framework war.
> And AIR is not safe for long term future for Apache Flex because of Adobe
> dependency.
> And i don't see why is would be hard to do both.
> The objective is to be multiplatform framework, unless its pointless.
>
>
> Le 05/10/2012 15:46, Cha
I'm wondering if most in this group are more interested about targeting
html5 than air because it seems to me it would be hard to do both well.
I want to run on AIR.
On Oct 5, 2012 9:38 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
> I agree with others that you should abandone the idea that Adobe could get
>
Got it.
+1
On Oct 4, 2012 9:30 AM, "Charles Monteiro"
wrote:
> Sorry how exactly do I cast my vote for this poll ?
> On Oct 4, 2012 7:22 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote:
>
>> Thanks Bertrand,
>>
>> I have added the [POLL] tag to the "Getting Star
Sorry how exactly do I cast my vote for this poll ?
On Oct 4, 2012 7:22 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote:
> Thanks Bertrand,
>
> I have added the [POLL] tag to the "Getting Started" - Page
> of the Apache Flex wiki. Haven't been mentioned there before ;)
>
>
> Sincerely Yours,
>
> Sebastian Mohr
> Apac
If that's all you need I would again check out Intellij IDEA Flash design
viewer plugin, that's exactly what it does, it even allows for configuring
of attributes though selecting the correct entity is buggy, doing a
"preview" is not
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, BentBit Apache-Flex wrote:
> H
>
> Now if we get some revolution going with AS -> JS compiling that is not
> using the Flash API, then it's time to really start thinking about a design
> inspector. ;-)Now if we get some revolution going with AS -> JS compiling
> that is not using the Flash API, then it's time to really start thi
and actually I did, and unless somehow my notifications are turned off
there and I have yet to receive a reply.
You all are just so much more engaging :)
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> >
> > Somewhere in the rel
pardon if inappropriate but since this seems to be the "forward" venue for
Flex app development, I thought I interrupt briefly.
We chose Flex /AIR because besides the tooling , robust libraries etc it
runs on both major desktops , Android and iOS and sure Blackberry.
I know it will run on MS Surf
lash Player instance that was not
> compatible with Linux.
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Charles Monteiro
> wrote:
> > that would be great, but from previous glimpses at this on this list it
> > seems that Adobe may have built incompatibilities with UI designer and
> t
ether FB itself was donated i.e. the IDE and not just the SDK
-charles
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Charles Monteiro <
charles.monte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks
> On Sep 19, 2012 9:54 AM, "Mark Shen" wrote:
>
>> no UI designer in FB4.7
>>
>> O
Thanks
On Sep 19, 2012 9:54 AM, "Mark Shen" wrote:
> no UI designer in FB4.7
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Charles Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui
> > designer.
> >
>
elf' mail
> asap!
>
> Cheers
> Phillip Lüdeling
>
> mobile mail
>
> Am 19.09.2012 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Monteiro >:
>
> > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui
> > designer.
> >
> > Thanks
>
sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui
designer.
Thanks
On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" wrote:
> >> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8?
> We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK
> identification and versioning
Does flash builder 4.7 support the ui designer .?
I assume available to 4.6 standard customers?
Thanks
Charles
On Sep 18, 2012 6:26 PM, "Scott Castle" wrote:
> Hi Flex developers,
>
> I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash Builder is
> currently in public beta with supp
I expect that some day and hopefully it will be a sooner day that I will be
able to un-shackle myself from Design view. Right now , I don't have enough
of a command of what components are available and in what contexts , never
mind all of the various options, and layout.
I understand that Design V
brilliant deduction :)
that was indeed the problem. I'm installing Apache Flex at the moment. My
main reason is to test whether my apps will work with it without issue. So
I will have to point IDEA and FB to use the apache sdk.
Is it as simple as that ? i.e. just telling FB and IDEA in the "regul
o diagnose this.
thanks for the help
-charles
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Om wrote:
> I am sorry, but I am not really sure what I am looking at in the video.
> Maybe you could show more context?
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Charles Monteiro <
> char...@nycsmalltalk.org
&g
at 12:21 PM, Charles Monteiro <
> char...@nycsmalltalk.org
> > wrote:
>
> > the binaries, also strangely I just found reference to what seems to be
> > "your" installer ? and running that gives me the same issue?
> >
>
> Do you mean the ins
? Is it the source release or the bin release?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Charles Monteiro <
> char...@nycsmalltalk.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi, wanted to test my 4.6 project with the new Apache 4.8 sdk, but every
> > attempt to dow
Hi, wanted to test my 4.6 project with the new Apache 4.8 sdk, but every
attempt to download it I get these multi - part archive dialog.
Is there a clean one shot url I can use to download this ?
thanks
--
Charles
If it's a package manager you wouldn't have to use it. Gems are really very
useful for pulling in community goodies and it's one of the reasons ruby is
so productive. I dont know of a counterpart in flex, pulling stuff via
git is more cumbersome.
On Jul 10, 2012 10:00 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
at the end of the article that author states:
Hopefully the Apache Flex community is able to port the Flex framework to
> Stage3D to unleash more of its potential
so I'm curious if the port to Stage3D is currently being worked ?
thanks
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jun Heider wrote:
>
>
not trying to start anything here, but if Apache Flex becomes a long term
viable effort I personally don't see why I would care to generate JS. I
find Flex infinitely better to work with.
-Charles
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Matteo Tassetti wrote:
> Do you have other suggestion about migrat
s (this is how I have mine setup -- Win for Desktop, Mac
> for Laptop).
>
> -Nick
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jeffry Houser >wrote:
>
> > On 3/31/2012 1:09 PM, Charles Monteiro wrote:
> >
> >> hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash
thanks, I guess when I did not see how a file template for a Flex unit test
I assumed lack of support. Anyhow, I am now getting off subject ,
unfortunately nobody has commented on their thoughts as a substitute for
the UI designer.
for those interested i.e. here's a link to a blog showng FlexUnit
's an alternative approach.
thanks
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 3/31/2012 1:09 PM, Charles Monteiro wrote:
>
>> hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash Builder IDE, for one
>> their license is tied to the computer and not to the user
really ? ok, I don't see FlexUnit as a framework available to the project.
I'll inquire in the IDEA forums , thanks.
I sent an email to Charles about that , the language on his site seems to
state the opposite. Hopefully, it looks like a well thought out tool.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Omar
hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash Builder IDE, for one
their license is tied to the computer and not to the user and I need to be
able to both work on Flex on my Win notebook and Mac Mini. Anyhow, in
giving up Flash Builder I have given up on the following elements that are
cruci
There's a difference between a plugin to a framework and "goodies" / "gem"
like repository. The difference is that a "goodies" repository depends on
the its "universe" typically that being a language and if done well its
declared dependencies to other entities. A plugin is a direct extension to
a f
There's a difference between a plugin to a framework and "goodies" / "gem"
like repository. The difference is that a "goodies" repository depends on
the its "universe" typically that being a language and if done well its
declared dependencies to other entities. A plugin is a direct extension to
a f
yes, exactly, Do we have a "gem" repository for Flex/AS3 ? Or will there be
one for Apache Flex ? sorry for my newbiness and if slightly on a tangent.
I just wonder where community members can put their "goodies" that are
add-on external components to the main core Apache Flex project.
On Thu, Mar
park
> based and follows spark rules they can be evaluated for inclusion into
> flex sdk.
>
> 2012/3/1 Charles Monteiro :
> > I agree, a functional MVC framework would be very important to have
> > available.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Haykel BEN JEMIA
&
I agree, a functional MVC framework would be very important to have
available.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Haykel BEN JEMIA wrote:
> I don't think it should be included in the SDK as every developer has his
> own preferences but it could be very interesting to the community anyway.
>
> Hayke
Is this type of thing that gives a newcomer like me hope that I'm not
making a bad move in embarking upon Flex at this stage of the game.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Doug Arthur wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Martin Heidegger
> wrote:
> > Congratulations Justin!
> >
> > yours
>
Sorry didn't see your response to Martin, very cool.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Charles Monteiro <
char...@monteirosfusion.com> wrote:
> Omar:
>
> Extremely cool.
>
> As a matter of fact one of my most typical use of JSON/BSON is with
> MongoDB. However, my m
Omar:
Extremely cool.
As a matter of fact one of my most typical use of JSON/BSON is with
MongoDB. However, my more common pattern is to have a middle tier / app
server that talks to the DB. I'm guessing your MongoAS3 allows one to
talk directly to MongoDB directly ?
So in doing this, did I un
I know , we are not meant to put up a wish list, but certainly having a
leaned down mechanism to message via http would be great.. In my case my
services are behind Ruby which has a bson implementation. ActionScript does
have a community package as well. I think it would be great to make it part
of
I could care less, but I'm just wondering what this buys us ? i.e. and if
it doesn't buy us much why would you add discrepancies vis a vis AS3 ?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> >
> >
> > If we went through with writing our own compiler I would cheer making
> semicolons ma
+1
its essential for RAD , Design View is key to prototyping , getting things
up and running, source view is for tweaking and polishing, both are
essential in any modern RAD environment
+ 1000 really
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Iuri Pereira wrote:
> +1
>
> Iuri
>
>
> 2012/2/22 Arturo Alv
many of the Smalltalk lists among others are replicated here:
http://www.nabble.com/
thanks for the link.
-Charles
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Charles Monteiro <
> char...@nycsmalltalk.org
> > wrote:
>
> > I
got it, and Tamarin interesting prospect, I think I have the sense of what
I need, thanks
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
> runtime anytime they want. They have not
generated.
thanks
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Arturo Alvarado wrote:
>
> From: "Charles Monteiro"
> > thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
> > runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible
> > to the
Is there a newsgroup like interface to this mailing list i.e. like a Nabble
or something other than using an email client ?
thanks
--
Charle
thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible
to the Apache Flex project. Its within the realm of possibility that they
can change something in the runtime that breaks for example current Flex
4.6 apps
hi, first of all I'm very new here. My timing is off since it seems that
Flex is my best alternative to replace my UI building technology, still is
albeit recent events are confusing things.
So this is what I mean by the subject line. My understanding is that the
Flash and Air runtimes have not be
First of all, just moved to the neighborhood.
I think you are totally on the money. Folks with the right background
understand how to exploit these tools and a UI design view is
indispensable. They provide a huge productivity advantage, folks not used
to them just don't get it. My core background
50 matches
Mail list logo