Re: [Flash Builder] Mystery email from Adobe Licensing

2012-12-08 Thread Charles Monteiro
neither did I On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:52 AM, James Roland Cabresos wrote: > I had one 4.6 license but didn't received such email. > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Kevo X Thomson >wrote: > > > This morning I received an email from Adobe titled "Your Adobe licensing > > order has been processe

RE: To AS4 or not

2012-10-22 Thread Charles Monteiro
Accessibility as for the disabled, physically impaired ? No, I don't see that as a hard requirement to start work on a port but something you would try to add later when it becomes available. The unclear implications of whether my flex as3 mobile app has a path forward in this new context of as4

Re: What is the essence of Flex? its future and the Next runtime (was: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)

2012-10-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
"but according to its new strategic shift it will be with the new gaming runtime only! " Do we know this to be true ? On Oct 19, 2012 8:59 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote: > Thanks Gordon for asking about the nature of Flex. > Flex is a RIA sdk and not a gaming SDK, ok thats quite obvious. > > Bu

Re: Any news about FalconJS donation? (was: Financing the Design View AIR App (Was: Re: Design View AIR App))

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Monteiro
it. >>> Please correct me if I am wrong. >>> Here there is a good solution if you want to use as to create js apps >>> >>> http://www.jangaroo.net/home/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5 October 2012 14:53, sébastien Paturel >>&g

Re: AW: AW: Financing the Design View AIR App (Was: Re: Design View AIR App)

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Monteiro
g drawback in the framework war. > And AIR is not safe for long term future for Apache Flex because of Adobe > dependency. > And i don't see why is would be hard to do both. > The objective is to be multiplatform framework, unless its pointless. > > > Le 05/10/2012 15:46, Cha

Re: AW: AW: Financing the Design View AIR App (Was: Re: Design View AIR App)

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Monteiro
I'm wondering if most in this group are more interested about targeting html5 than air because it seems to me it would be hard to do both well. I want to run on AIR. On Oct 5, 2012 9:38 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote: > I agree with others that you should abandone the idea that Adobe could get >

Re: [POLL] tag (was: Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for Apache Flex, the more attractive Apache Flex becomes")

2012-10-04 Thread Charles Monteiro
Got it. +1 On Oct 4, 2012 9:30 AM, "Charles Monteiro" wrote: > Sorry how exactly do I cast my vote for this poll ? > On Oct 4, 2012 7:22 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote: > >> Thanks Bertrand, >> >> I have added the [POLL] tag to the "Getting Star

Re: [POLL] tag (was: Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for Apache Flex, the more attractive Apache Flex becomes")

2012-10-04 Thread Charles Monteiro
Sorry how exactly do I cast my vote for this poll ? On Oct 4, 2012 7:22 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote: > Thanks Bertrand, > > I have added the [POLL] tag to the "Getting Started" - Page > of the Apache Flex wiki. Haven't been mentioned there before ;) > > > Sincerely Yours, > > Sebastian Mohr > Apac

Re: Apache Flex GUI Designer tools

2012-10-02 Thread Charles Monteiro
If that's all you need I would again check out Intellij IDEA Flash design viewer plugin, that's exactly what it does, it even allows for configuring of attributes though selecting the correct entity is buggy, doing a "preview" is not On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, BentBit Apache-Flex wrote: > H

Re: Apache Flex GUI Designer tools

2012-10-02 Thread Charles Monteiro
> > Now if we get some revolution going with AS -> JS compiling that is not > using the Flash API, then it's time to really start thinking about a design > inspector. ;-)Now if we get some revolution going with AS -> JS compiling > that is not using the Flash API, then it's time to really start thi

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-20 Thread Charles Monteiro
and actually I did, and unless somehow my notifications are turned off there and I have yet to receive a reply. You all are just so much more engaging :) On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Jeffry Houser wrote: > > > > > Somewhere in the rel

Surface RT

2012-09-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
pardon if inappropriate but since this seems to be the "forward" venue for Flex app development, I thought I interrupt briefly. We chose Flex /AIR because besides the tooling , robust libraries etc it runs on both major desktops , Android and iOS and sure Blackberry. I know it will run on MS Surf

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
lash Player instance that was not > compatible with Linux. > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Charles Monteiro > wrote: > > that would be great, but from previous glimpses at this on this list it > > seems that Adobe may have built incompatibilities with UI designer and > t

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
ether FB itself was donated i.e. the IDE and not just the SDK -charles On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Charles Monteiro < charles.monte...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks > On Sep 19, 2012 9:54 AM, "Mark Shen" wrote: > >> no UI designer in FB4.7 >> >> O

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
Thanks On Sep 19, 2012 9:54 AM, "Mark Shen" wrote: > no UI designer in FB4.7 > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Charles Monteiro > wrote: > > > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > > designer. > > >

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
elf' mail > asap! > > Cheers > Phillip Lüdeling > > mobile mail > > Am 19.09.2012 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Monteiro >: > > > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > > designer. > > > > Thanks >

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-19 Thread Charles Monteiro
sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui designer. Thanks On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" wrote: > >> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? > We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK > identification and versioning

Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support

2012-09-18 Thread Charles Monteiro
Does flash builder 4.7 support the ui designer .? I assume available to 4.6 standard customers? Thanks Charles On Sep 18, 2012 6:26 PM, "Scott Castle" wrote: > Hi Flex developers, > > I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash Builder is > currently in public beta with supp

Re: can't download 4.8

2012-08-22 Thread Charles Monteiro
I expect that some day and hopefully it will be a sooner day that I will be able to un-shackle myself from Design view. Right now , I don't have enough of a command of what components are available and in what contexts , never mind all of the various options, and layout. I understand that Design V

Re: can't download 4.8

2012-08-22 Thread Charles Monteiro
brilliant deduction :) that was indeed the problem. I'm installing Apache Flex at the moment. My main reason is to test whether my apps will work with it without issue. So I will have to point IDEA and FB to use the apache sdk. Is it as simple as that ? i.e. just telling FB and IDEA in the "regul

Re: can't download 4.8

2012-08-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
o diagnose this. thanks for the help -charles On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Om wrote: > I am sorry, but I am not really sure what I am looking at in the video. > Maybe you could show more context? > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Charles Monteiro < > char...@nycsmalltalk.org &g

Re: can't download 4.8

2012-08-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
at 12:21 PM, Charles Monteiro < > char...@nycsmalltalk.org > > wrote: > > > the binaries, also strangely I just found reference to what seems to be > > "your" installer ? and running that gives me the same issue? > > > > Do you mean the ins

Re: can't download 4.8

2012-08-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
? Is it the source release or the bin release? > > Thanks, > Om > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Charles Monteiro < > char...@nycsmalltalk.org > > wrote: > > > Hi, wanted to test my 4.6 project with the new Apache 4.8 sdk, but every > > attempt to dow

can't download 4.8

2012-08-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
Hi, wanted to test my 4.6 project with the new Apache 4.8 sdk, but every attempt to download it I get these multi - part archive dialog. Is there a clean one shot url I can use to download this ? thanks -- Charles

Re: Suggestion : Adopt a package manager like Ruby Gems for Flex as a first class citizen of the SDK

2012-07-10 Thread Charles Monteiro
If it's a package manager you wouldn't have to use it. Gems are really very useful for pulling in community goodies and it's one of the reasons ruby is so productive. I dont know of a counterpart in flex, pulling stuff via git is more cumbersome. On Jul 10, 2012 10:00 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:

Re: Apache Flex Mobile Retina

2012-05-08 Thread Charles Monteiro
at the end of the article that author states: Hopefully the Apache Flex community is able to port the Flex framework to > Stage3D to unleash more of its potential so I'm curious if the port to Stage3D is currently being worked ? thanks On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jun Heider wrote: > >

Re: Falcon JS is still alive?

2012-04-13 Thread Charles Monteiro
not trying to start anything here, but if Apache Flex becomes a long term viable effort I personally don't see why I would care to generate JS. I find Flex infinitely better to work with. -Charles On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Matteo Tassetti wrote: > Do you have other suggestion about migrat

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Monteiro
s (this is how I have mine setup -- Win for Desktop, Mac > for Laptop). > > -Nick > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jeffry Houser >wrote: > > > On 3/31/2012 1:09 PM, Charles Monteiro wrote: > > > >> hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Monteiro
thanks, I guess when I did not see how a file template for a Flex unit test I assumed lack of support. Anyhow, I am now getting off subject , unfortunately nobody has commented on their thoughts as a substitute for the UI designer. for those interested i.e. here's a link to a blog showng FlexUnit

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Monteiro
's an alternative approach. thanks On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote: > On 3/31/2012 1:09 PM, Charles Monteiro wrote: > >> hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash Builder IDE, for one >> their license is tied to the computer and not to the user

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Monteiro
really ? ok, I don't see FlexUnit as a framework available to the project. I'll inquire in the IDEA forums , thanks. I sent an email to Charles about that , the language on his site seems to state the opposite. Hopefully, it looks like a well thought out tool. On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Omar

the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Monteiro
hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash Builder IDE, for one their license is tied to the computer and not to the user and I need to be able to both work on Flex on my Win notebook and Mac Mini. Anyhow, in giving up Flash Builder I have given up on the following elements that are cruci

Re: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework

2012-03-02 Thread Charles Monteiro
There's a difference between a plugin to a framework and "goodies" / "gem" like repository. The difference is that a "goodies" repository depends on the its "universe" typically that being a language and if done well its declared dependencies to other entities. A plugin is a direct extension to a f

Re: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework

2012-03-02 Thread Charles Monteiro
There's a difference between a plugin to a framework and "goodies" / "gem" like repository. The difference is that a "goodies" repository depends on the its "universe" typically that being a language and if done well its declared dependencies to other entities. A plugin is a direct extension to a f

Re: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework

2012-03-01 Thread Charles Monteiro
yes, exactly, Do we have a "gem" repository for Flex/AS3 ? Or will there be one for Apache Flex ? sorry for my newbiness and if slightly on a tangent. I just wonder where community members can put their "goodies" that are add-on external components to the main core Apache Flex project. On Thu, Mar

Re: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework

2012-03-01 Thread Charles Monteiro
park > based and follows spark rules they can be evaluated for inclusion into > flex sdk. > > 2012/3/1 Charles Monteiro : > > I agree, a functional MVC framework would be very important to have > > available. > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Haykel BEN JEMIA &

Re: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework

2012-03-01 Thread Charles Monteiro
I agree, a functional MVC framework would be very important to have available. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Haykel BEN JEMIA wrote: > I don't think it should be included in the SDK as every developer has his > own preferences but it could be very interesting to the community anyway. > > Hayke

Re: Welcome new PPMC Member & Committer, Justin Mclean

2012-02-24 Thread Charles Monteiro
Is this type of thing that gives a newcomer like me hope that I'm not making a bad move in embarking upon Flex at this stage of the game. On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Doug Arthur wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Martin Heidegger > wrote: > > Congratulations Justin! > > > > yours >

Re: BSON

2012-02-24 Thread Charles Monteiro
Sorry didn't see your response to Martin, very cool. On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Charles Monteiro < char...@monteirosfusion.com> wrote: > Omar: > > Extremely cool. > > As a matter of fact one of my most typical use of JSON/BSON is with > MongoDB. However, my m

Re: BSON

2012-02-24 Thread Charles Monteiro
Omar: Extremely cool. As a matter of fact one of my most typical use of JSON/BSON is with MongoDB. However, my more common pattern is to have a middle tier / app server that talks to the DB. I'm guessing your MongoAS3 allows one to talk directly to MongoDB directly ? So in doing this, did I un

BSON

2012-02-23 Thread Charles Monteiro
I know , we are not meant to put up a wish list, but certainly having a leaned down mechanism to message via http would be great.. In my case my services are behind Ruby which has a bson implementation. ActionScript does have a community package as well. I think it would be great to make it part of

Re: Would anyone care if we ditched support for semicolons being optional?

2012-02-22 Thread Charles Monteiro
I could care less, but I'm just wondering what this buys us ? i.e. and if it doesn't buy us much why would you add discrepancies vis a vis AS3 ? On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > > > > > > If we went through with writing our own compiler I would cheer making > semicolons ma

Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there is sufficient interest

2012-02-22 Thread Charles Monteiro
+1 its essential for RAD , Design View is key to prototyping , getting things up and running, source view is for tweaking and polishing, both are essential in any modern RAD environment + 1000 really On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Iuri Pereira wrote: > +1 > > Iuri > > > 2012/2/22 Arturo Alv

Re: Another view into this mailing list ?

2012-02-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
many of the Smalltalk lists among others are replicated here: http://www.nabble.com/ thanks for the link. -Charles On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Charles Monteiro < > char...@nycsmalltalk.org > > wrote: > > > I

Re: Can Adobe kill Apache Flex

2012-02-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
got it, and Tamarin interesting prospect, I think I have the sense of what I need, thanks On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola < labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > >thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the > runtime anytime they want. They have not

Re: Can Adobe kill Apache Flex

2012-02-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
generated. thanks On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Arturo Alvarado wrote: > > From: "Charles Monteiro" > > thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the > > runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible > > to the

Another view into this mailing list ?

2012-02-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
Is there a newsgroup like interface to this mailing list i.e. like a Nabble or something other than using an email client ? thanks -- Charle

Re: Can Adobe kill Apache Flex

2012-02-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible to the Apache Flex project. Its within the realm of possibility that they can change something in the runtime that breaks for example current Flex 4.6 apps

Can Adobe kill Apache Flex

2012-02-21 Thread Charles Monteiro
hi, first of all I'm very new here. My timing is off since it seems that Flex is my best alternative to replace my UI building technology, still is albeit recent events are confusing things. So this is what I mean by the subject line. My understanding is that the Flash and Air runtimes have not be

Re: [RT] Design View in FlashBuilder

2012-02-17 Thread Charles Monteiro
First of all, just moved to the neighborhood. I think you are totally on the money. Folks with the right background understand how to exploit these tools and a UI design view is indispensable. They provide a huge productivity advantage, folks not used to them just don't get it. My core background