Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-29 Thread Sasi Inguva
If we can support ffmpeg to parse and display a timeline with multiple edits correctly, I am ok with deleting that code. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Derek Buitenhuis < derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/29/2018 1:06 PM, wm4 wrote: > > I think mov files at least use a > > filename/URL

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-29 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 3/29/2018 1:06 PM, wm4 wrote: > I think mov files at least use a > filename/URL for external references, which actually could be handled > in generic files. The dref box is for the whole track, FWIW, and not for edit list entries. - Derek ___ ffmpeg-

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-29 Thread wm4
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:00:03 +0200 Steve Lhomme wrote: > Le 27/03/2018 à 22:45, Dave Rice a écrit : > >> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:33 PM, wm4 wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 > >> Dave Rice wrote: > >> > On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > wrote: >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-29 Thread Steve Lhomme
Le 27/03/2018 à 22:45, Dave Rice a écrit : On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:33 PM, wm4 wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 Dave Rice wrote: On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: I think we should drop the internal crap if the to

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-28 Thread Dave Rice
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 5:16 PM, wm4 wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:45:23 -0400 > Dave Rice mailto:d...@dericed.com>> wrote: > >>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:33 PM, wm4 wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 >>> Dave Rice wrote: >>> > On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-28 Thread wm4
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 20:44:00 +0100 Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > So, I know we have edit list "support" in mov.c, but I am steadfast in my > belief that it is incorrect to implement it at the demuxing layer. By the > ISOBMFF spec, it is supposed to be applied at the presenattion layer. I'm > aware we

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread wm4
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:45:23 -0400 Dave Rice wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:33 PM, wm4 wrote: > > > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 > > Dave Rice wrote: > > > >>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrot

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread wm4
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:45:23 -0400 Dave Rice wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:33 PM, wm4 wrote: > > > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 > > Dave Rice wrote: > > > >>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrot

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread Dave Rice
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:33 PM, wm4 wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 > Dave Rice wrote: > >>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the A

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread wm4
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 Dave Rice wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > > wrote: > > > > On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > >> I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support > >> it. Would also solve a lot of issues

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 27 March 2018 at 21:01, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support > > it. Would also solve a lot of issues like ffmpeg.c not trimming the start > > frame (so people complain all the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread Dave Rice
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > wrote: > > On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >> I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support >> it. Would also solve a lot of issues like ffmpeg.c not trimming the start >> frame (so people complain a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/27/18, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >> I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support >> it. Would also solve a lot of issues like ffmpeg.c not trimming the start >> frame (so people complain all the time about longer f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support > it. Would also solve a lot of issues like ffmpeg.c not trimming the start > frame (so people complain all the time about longer files). I personally agree, but I thought

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Exporting virtual timelines as stream side data

2018-03-27 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 27 March 2018 at 20:44, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > So, I know we have edit list "support" in mov.c, but I am steadfast in my > belief that it is incorrect to implement it at the demuxing layer. By the > ISOBMFF spec, it is supposed to be applied at the presenattion layer. I'm > aware we probabl