On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:11:11 -0400 Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > >> I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support > >> it. Would also solve a lot of issues like ffmpeg.c not trimming the start > >> frame (so people complain all the time about longer files). > > > > I personally agree, but I thought I'd be diplomatic about it, since it would > > technically be losing a 'feature', since it would no longer Just Work(ish) > > and require user applications to apply timelines themselves - and I figured > > some would argue that point. > > +1 I’m willing to contribute what information or samples would be needed to > help with Matroska support with virtual timelines. IMO, this would be a > valuable feature to have in ffmpeg. > Dave Rice Some explanations how this interacts with editions would be good. Or documenting ordered chapters and segment linking in the mkv "spec" at all. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
