> On Mar 27, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 3/27/2018 8:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >> I think we should drop the internal crap if the tools and the API support >> it. Would also solve a lot of issues like ffmpeg.c not trimming the start >> frame (so people complain all the time about longer files). > > I personally agree, but I thought I'd be diplomatic about it, since it would > technically be losing a 'feature', since it would no longer Just Work(ish) > and require user applications to apply timelines themselves - and I figured > some would argue that point.
+1 I’m willing to contribute what information or samples would be needed to help with Matroska support with virtual timelines. IMO, this would be a valuable feature to have in ffmpeg. Dave Rice _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
