On Jun 4, 2016 09:45, "Michael Niedermayer" wrote:
>
> CCing lukasz and ganesh ...
> so they can correct what we misremember if they want, also dont want
> to speak about people behind their back ...
>
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:26:22PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 6/4/2016 7:33 AM, Michael
On 6/4/16, 4:33 AM, "ffmpeg-devel on behalf of Michael Niedermayer"
wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 10:30:32AM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The problem with this project is that it has not enough active developers.
>> It looks like most of the devs swiched into "stand-by" mode
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 11:28:03AM -0400, compn wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:03:47 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:19:29PM -0400, compn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:13:09 +0200
> > > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:
CCing lukasz and ganesh ...
so they can correct what we misremember if they want, also dont want
to speak about people behind their back ...
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:26:22PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 6/4/2016 7:33 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 10:30:32AM +0200,
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:03:47 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:19:29PM -0400, compn wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:13:09 +0200
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet
> > > wrote: i want some assistent to
On 6/4/2016 7:33 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 10:30:32AM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The problem with this project is that it has not enough active developers.
>> It looks like most of the devs swiched into "stand-by" mode or something
>> and sadly no new
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:19:29PM -0400, compn wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:13:09 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> > i want some assistent to help with dayly server admin duties
> > most root admins we have help and
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 10:30:32AM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The problem with this project is that it has not enough active developers. It
> looks like most of the devs swiched into "stand-by" mode or something
> and sadly no new people are joining in to push development forward ;)
Hi,
The problem with this project is that it has not enough active developers. It
looks like most of the devs swiched into "stand-by" mode or something
and sadly no new people are joining in to push development forward ;)
Regards
___
ffmpeg-devel mail
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:13:09 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> i want some assistent to help with dayly server admin duties
> most root admins we have help and contribute but are often busy
> raz recently set up a full backup s
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:32:51 +0200
Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> SIX)
> > May 28 19:32:58since cehoyos is here, we could
> > maybe talk about his behavior and why the CoC and repercussions for
> > violating it was introduced to begin with May 28 21:51:31
> > is there anything concrete we’r
Hi,
sorry if I'm or was confusing, I'm best-effort here.
2016-06-03 21:13 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> > FOUR.TWO)
[...]
> i want some assistent to help with dayly server admin duties
> most root admins we have help and contribute but are often busy
> raz recently set up a full backup system
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
[...]
> FOUR.TWO)
> > May 28 20:58:44 we probably should config postfix or
> > spamassasin to check DMARK/DKIM/SPF or part of that on incoming mai (not
> > really important but i thn it doest curretly)
>
> Details on what
Hi,
here's I think a list of things left to do. I remember saste doing it
on some occasions.
Please comment on whether you think I have pointed an actual action to
perform. Don't mind the details for now, it's just to get the train
going.
2016-05-30 10:49 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
ONE)
>
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:11:12AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 09:11:38PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 28 May 2016, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> >
> > >On date Saturday 2016-05-28 18:57:00 +0200, Paul B Mahol encoded:
> > >>On 5/28/16, Clement Boes
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 09:11:38PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 28 May 2016, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>
> >On date Saturday 2016-05-28 18:57:00 +0200, Paul B Mahol encoded:
> >>On 5/28/16, Clement Boesch wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >>
On Sat, 28 May 2016, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Saturday 2016-05-28 18:57:00 +0200, Paul B Mahol encoded:
On 5/28/16, Clement Boesch wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
>> the Saturday of
On date Saturday 2016-05-28 18:57:00 +0200, Paul B Mahol encoded:
> On 5/28/16, Clement Boesch wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
> >> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
> >> UT
On 5/28/16, Clement Boesch wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
>> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
>> UTC 17.
>>
>
> So I suppose this happens in about half an hour. Can you remind us
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
> UTC 17.
>
So I suppose this happens in about half an hour. Can you remind us the
IRC channel?
--
Clément B.
signature
On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 15:42 Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:00 AM, James Almer wrote:
> [...]
>
> > If not enough people are present no decisions will be made. Worst case
> > scenario,
> > nothing is discussed either and the meeting is re-scheduled in the hopes
> > people
>
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:00 AM, James Almer wrote:
[...]
> If not enough people are present no decisions will be made. Worst case
> scenario,
> nothing is discussed either and the meeting is re-scheduled in the hopes
> people
> actually confirm their presence this time around.
>
> In any case, w
Hi,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:00 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 5/26/2016 7:56 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> On 5/26/16, James Almer wrote:
> >>> On 5/18/2016 5:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to hav
On 5/26/2016 7:56 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 5/26/16, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 5/18/2016 5:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Hi,
I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
the Saturday of the next week, Saturday M
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 5/26/16, James Almer wrote:
>> On 5/18/2016 5:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
>>> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
>>> UTC 17.
>>>
>>> Candidate topics of the da
On 5/26/16, Lou Logan wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016, at 12:43 PM, James Almer wrote:
>>
>> This has gotten Clement's explicit confirmation and Michael's implicit
>> after eight days. With mine now that'd be three.
>> We're only two days away from the proposed date. If nobody else confirms,
>> mayb
On 5/26/16, James Almer wrote:
> On 5/18/2016 5:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
>> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
>> UTC 17.
>>
>> Candidate topics of the day:
>> - Code of Conduct and policy around it
>> - technical dev
On Thu, May 26, 2016, at 12:43 PM, James Almer wrote:
>
> This has gotten Clement's explicit confirmation and Michael's implicit
> after eight days. With mine now that'd be three.
> We're only two days away from the proposed date. If nobody else confirms,
> maybe we should postpone it while we poke
On 5/18/2016 5:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
> UTC 17.
>
> Candidate topics of the day:
> - Code of Conduct and policy around it
> - technical development issues
> - misc topics
>
> Fee
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
> UTC 17.
>
> Candidate topics of the day:
> - Code of Conduct and policy around it
> - technical development issues
> -
On 5/19/16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
>> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
>> UTC 17.
>>
>> Candidate topics of the day:
>
>> - Code of Conduct and policy
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
> the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
> UTC 17.
>
> Candidate topics of the day:
> - Code of Conduct and policy around it
does this affect the current vote ?
i
Hi,
I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on
the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28,
UTC 17.
Candidate topics of the day:
- Code of Conduct and policy around it
- technical development issues
- misc topics
Feel free to propose other topics.
Best regards.
___
Hi Ngassa,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Ngassa Finjap wrote:
> Hi Yayoi,
>
> Thank you for writing a summary of the IRC Meeting which took place
> yesterday regarding the upcoming Outreachy program. Yaaay! ^_^ [ Sadness
> levels drop. ]
I am glad to hear that.
>
> IMHO, It's fine leaving di
I missed a very very important point from the summary I wrote.
Action Item:
Raynald: He will write a news entry about last Outreachy project.
Also, thanking Samsung to fund
at least two interns in the past rounds. THANK YOU SAMSUNG!
I am terribly sorry for missing this!! I was super nervous
Hi Yayoi,
Thank you for writing a summary of the IRC Meeting which took place
yesterday regarding the upcoming Outreachy program. Yaaay! ^_^ [ Sadness
levels drop. ]
IMHO, It's fine leaving discussions concerning Outreachy on this mailing
list since it also concerns development of FFmpeg. Please
Hello everyone,
Here is the meeting summary for yesterday meeting (Item No.5 about Outreachy).
I also added possible future agenda. And please let me know if you
have any questions. Also, I will probably start a separate mailing
list for just regarding outreachy related issues, unless I should kee
On date Saturday 2015-09-12 16:13:53 +0200, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> On date Monday 2015-09-07 11:37:47 +0200, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> > propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
On date Monday 2015-09-07 11:37:47 +0200, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
> different time if this can't suit you.
>
> The IRC meeting channel will be pu
Le sextidi 26 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> If we depend on these developers/contributors then IMO we should take
> their oppinons and objections serious and if one of them is willing
> to risk her/his good name to oppose a proposal in public and maybe also
> plans to put s
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 06:50:50AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Yayoi Ukai
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Sep 10,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 06:50:50AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Yayoi Ukai wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 06:50:50AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Yayoi Ukai wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >>
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Yayoi Ukai wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> >> propose the
FYI: Here is my experience with Python.org
Step 1: If it the decision is not so important (simple patch etc.) and
if 3 reviewers say yes, it will be merged.
Also, it seems there are no maintainers for specific parts of the
code, but instead they have "reviewers" and only
reviewers can review the p
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
>> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
>> different ti
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
>> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
>> different time if this
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le quintidi 25 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > I have a few problems with using the UN security council as
> > comparission
>
[..]
> The project needs a way of making a decision when people do not agree.
+1,
Le quintidi 25 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> I have a few problems with using the UN security council as
> comparission
I agree that this comparison is not very good, but I do not think that your
fist mail about vetoes and unanimous consensus address the issue.
Discussing
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:58:51PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday,
Le quartidi 24 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
> A less important issue; but I think a clear stance on use of
> Github/Gitorious and their pull request development model would be
> useful. I think it is clear that in general many people here do not
> like it, and repeated commen
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
> different time if this can't suit you.
>
> The IRC meeting channel will be public and the
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> > propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
> > di
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
> different time if this can't suit you.
>
> The IRC meeting channel will be publ
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
> different time if this can't suit you.
>
Being in CEST, it kind of blocks the
On Sep 8, 2015 3:21 AM, "Michael Niedermayer" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 09:25:20PM -0700, Yayoi Ukai wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I propose to have an
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 09:25:20PM -0700, Yayoi Ukai wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> >> propose the t
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
>> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
>> different time
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
> propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
> different time if this can't suit you.
>
> The IRC meeting channel will be publ
Hi,
I propose to have an official IRC meeting on the next Saturday, and I
propose the tentative time of 15:00 UTC, but feel free to propose a
different time if this can't suit you.
The IRC meeting channel will be public and the log will be published
at the end of the meeting.
This meeting is als
On date Tuesday 2014-09-30 20:57:33 -0700, Timothy Gu encoded:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting the next Saturday, 4th
> > October, UTC 16. Alternatively, I propose the Saturday of the next
> > week,
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting the next Saturday, 4th
> October, UTC 16. Alternatively, I propose the Saturday of the next
> week, Saturday October 11, same time.
I don't think I will be available for the ent
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:39:23 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting the next Saturday, 4th
> October, UTC 16. Alternatively, I propose the Saturday of the next
> week, Saturday October 11, same time.
I can most likely show up on Oct 4. I'll be un
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:39:23PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting the next Saturday, 4th
> October, UTC 16. Alternatively, I propose the Saturday of the next
> week, Saturday October 11, same time.
>
> Candidate topics of the day:
> - VDD
Hi,
I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting the next Saturday, 4th
October, UTC 16. Alternatively, I propose the Saturday of the next
week, Saturday October 11, same time.
Candidate topics of the day:
- VDD 2014 report and discussion, in particular with regards to
relationships with lib
65 matches
Mail list logo
