On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:13:09 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > i want some assistent to help with dayly server admin duties > most root admins we have help and contribute but are often busy > raz recently set up a full backup system for us, someone seems > helping with security updates as iam not always the first doing them > (i think its lou but didnt check) and all kinds of other things ... > > what would be really nice would be someone who has some time and for > whom server admining is a fun thing to do, > someone who would do it "because it needs to be done" would be 2nd > choice IMHO > i am against using github, but am for using vlc admins if we vote that way. i think i may take back my offer to admin. i was more offering to help michael with $random admin tasks. but i dont think i can dedicate much time to it, sorry :( > > [...] > > SIX) > > > May 28 19:32:58 <jamrial> since cehoyos is here, we could > > > maybe talk about his behavior and why the CoC and repercussions > > > for violating it was introduced to begin with May 28 21:51:31 > > > <BBB> is there anything concrete we’re going to do w.r.t. derek > > > and carl? May 28 21:59:52 <kierank> So Derek and carl? May > > > 28 22:26:54 <nevcairiel> its too late now, and we need to > > > handle the situation at hand May 28 22:28:24 <kurosu_> > > > nevcairiel, do you want a vote here and now, to what effect? May > > > 28 22:31:09 <BBB> I agree that a vote on the ML would be better > > > to give people that fell asleep here the chance to participate > > > also May 28 22:34:59 <kurosu_> It's late here. I'm ok for a > > > vote also, just not sure what kind of offense it would be > > > > And the big, flashy pink, elephant in the room: > > Action: draft a vote on the repercussions to Carl Eugen Hoyos > > behaviours (patch submission, general interaction with others) > > Note, I don't have a strong idea on what it may contain (option of > > temp/week/perma ban, warning, removal of some rights, etc). > > iam not suggesting anything specific but there is one thing that i > think i have not seen talked about and that is moderation. Mailman > supports moderating individual subscribers. > > It might be along the lines of > If one repeatly and conciously violates the CoC and no real solution > can be found, he can be given the choice by the mailman admins to > either promise to attempt not to repeat the violation > or to be moderated until an event occurs that changes the situation > or some timeout. > The insulted person should have the option to veto this at any time so > if one feels that it wasnt enough to justify the inconvenience the > "hurt" party should be able to stop this. > This would have to be combined with something effective for IRC and > possibly git, in case issues shift there too i like the idea of moderating certain members, when they start in with insults. assuming we vote in the CoC... i personally enjoy free speech to insult everyone but , democracy :P -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
