On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 17:47:44 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Since I am currently in the warning suppression business, I can help
> out at least in some basic checking. Unfortunately, I believe the icc
> is not freely licensed, which means I can't test this stuff.
I'll get in touch "when I
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 16:07:53 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> > BTW, are the "remaining" (meaning: more than from gcc) warnings emitted
>> > by the Intel C(++) Compiler redundant or false? The icc configuration
>> > should then probably
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 16:07:53 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > BTW, are the "remaining" (meaning: more than from gcc) warnings emitted
> > by the Intel C(++) Compiler redundant or false? The icc configuration
> > should then probably silence them.
>
> I doubt anyone has ever investigated them
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 22:52:28 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > ping: the reason I persist in this is because (long-term) the only 2
> > compilers where we can reasonably reach a near "warning is regression"
> > state and benefit
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 22:52:28 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> ping: the reason I persist in this is because (long-term) the only 2
> compilers where we can reasonably reach a near "warning is regression"
> state and benefit from it are clang and gcc.
BTW, are the "remaining" (meaning: more t
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 01:00:17AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
>> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
>> bunch
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 01:00:17AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
> bunch of warnings on clang e.g
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless
>>> warnings.
>>> The concept of av_u
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
>> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
>> bunch of war
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
> The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
> bunch of warnings on clang e.g
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=2015091818
Commit 6dac8c8327 disabled av_uninit for clang, due to some useless warnings.
The concept of av_uninit is inherently useful though. This patch silences a
bunch of warnings on clang e.g
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150918181527&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-vectorize-stripmine-
11 matches
Mail list logo
