On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 16:07:53 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> > BTW, are the "remaining" (meaning: more than from gcc) warnings emitted >> > by the Intel C(++) Compiler redundant or false? The icc configuration >> > should then probably silence them. >> >> I doubt anyone has ever investigated them... > > configure creates a quite explicit list of warning suppressions for icc > already. Somebody did investigate at one point. My icc is a bit old > (14.0.3.174 is the newest I have a license for), but I can take a stab > sometime, or ask here what the point of the warnings could be, if noone > minds.
Since I am currently in the warning suppression business, I can help out at least in some basic checking. Unfortunately, I believe the icc is not freely licensed, which means I can't test this stuff. > > Thanks, > Moritz > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
