Hi, On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 22:52:28 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > > ping: the reason I persist in this is because (long-term) the only 2 > > compilers where we can reasonably reach a near "warning is regression" > > state and benefit from it are clang and gcc. > > BTW, are the "remaining" (meaning: more than from gcc) warnings emitted > by the Intel C(++) Compiler redundant or false? The icc configuration > should then probably silence them. I doubt anyone has ever investigated them... Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
