Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-12 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2017-04-03 18:40 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > 2017-04-03 13:34 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino : >> On 3 April 2017 at 10:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> >>> 2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino : >>> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> This is the Boos

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-03 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2017-04-03 13:34 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino : > On 3 April 2017 at 10:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> 2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino : >> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if >> >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-03 Thread Nicolas George
Le quartidi 14 germinal, an CCXXV, Ricardo Constantino a écrit : > I was talking about the headers, which is the only part that matters to > FFmpeg. I do not know the specifics, so just for references: The license that matter is the license of ALL the files that are needed at build time. > The S

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-03 Thread Ricardo Constantino
On 3 April 2017 at 10:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino : > > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > > >> > >> This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if > >> that license is all that matters, its obviously fine. >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-03 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino : > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > >> >> This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if >> that license is all that matters, its obviously fine. >> >> > Just downloaded the latest 10.8.5 SDK and checked every fi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-01 Thread Ricardo Constantino
On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if > that license is all that matters, its obviously fine. > > Just downloaded the latest 10.8.5 SDK and checked every file inside "Blackmagic DeckLink SDK 10.8.5\Win\include". All

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-01 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > On 1 April 2017 at 00:20, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> To the best of my knowledge, decklink is a non-free dependency. >> >> Please comment, Carl Eugen >> >> ___ >> ffmpeg-devel mail

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-04-01 Thread Ricardo Constantino
On 1 April 2017 at 00:20, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > To the best of my knowledge, decklink is a non-free dependency. > > Please comment, Carl Eugen > > ___ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]configure: Fix decklink license dependency

2017-03-31 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Hi! To the best of my knowledge, decklink is a non-free dependency. Please comment, Carl Eugen From bc95eac06af339535037bba329d39026c3f87a3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl Eugen Hoyos Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 01:18:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] configure: Fix decklink license dependency --- conf