2017-04-03 13:34 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com>: > On 3 April 2017 at 10:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com>: >> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if >> >> that license is all that matters, its obviously fine. >> >> >> >> >> > Just downloaded the latest 10.8.5 SDK and checked every file inside >> > "Blackmagic DeckLink SDK 10.8.5\Win\include". All files contain this >> > same license with only the copyright year changing and a couple extra >> > newlines on some. >> >> First: Are you talking about the library or the headers? >> I was talking about a non-free library that can be used with >> LGPL but not GPL. (Assuming the library really is closed-source) > > I was talking about the headers, which is the only part that > matters to FFmpeg.
This is not true (it would mean that you would only have to release your headers under GPL to create a distributable binary using GPL software linked against non-free libraries). But since it appears correct that it is not legal to distribute the header files either, I will apply the configure patch tomorrow. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
