On 3 April 2017 at 10:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com>: > > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if > >> that license is all that matters, its obviously fine. > >> > >> > > Just downloaded the latest 10.8.5 SDK and checked every file inside > > "Blackmagic DeckLink SDK 10.8.5\Win\include". All files contain this > > same license with only the copyright year changing and a couple extra > > newlines on some. > > First: Are you talking about the library or the headers? > I was talking about a non-free library that can be used with > LGPL but not GPL. (Assuming the library really is closed-source) > I was talking about the headers, which is the only part that matters to FFmpeg. > > Secondly: > How did you download it? > At Debian, it was claimed that although the headers contain these > BSD headers, you had to agree not to distribute them to get > the SDK in the first place: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839941 > So even the headers are non-free. > > The SDK probably isn't redistributable due to EULA, sure, but if all relevant files specifically contain Boost license don't they override the EULA? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
