2017-04-03 18:40 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>: > 2017-04-03 13:34 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com>: >> On 3 April 2017 at 10:56, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 2017-04-01 16:37 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com>: >>> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:03, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> This is the Boost Software license, very similar to BSD/MIT, so if >>> >> that license is all that matters, its obviously fine. >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Just downloaded the latest 10.8.5 SDK and checked every file inside >>> > "Blackmagic DeckLink SDK 10.8.5\Win\include". All files contain this >>> > same license with only the copyright year changing and a couple extra >>> > newlines on some. >>> >>> First: Are you talking about the library or the headers? >>> I was talking about a non-free library that can be used with >>> LGPL but not GPL. (Assuming the library really is closed-source) >> >> I was talking about the headers, which is the only part that >> matters to FFmpeg. > > This is not true (it would mean that you would only have to > release your headers under GPL to create a distributable > binary using GPL software linked against non-free libraries). > > But since it appears correct that it is not legal to distribute > the header files either, I will apply the configure patch tomorrow.
Finally pushed and backported. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
