On 01/02/2016 03:21 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 01/02/2016 03:13 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
please run md5sum on your file and tell me the value so we can be
sure this is the same video file
Yes, it's the same one.
And once again, without applying the latest lavf/qtpalette patch the
following
On 01/02/2016 03:13 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
please run md5sum on your file and tell me the value so we can be
sure this is the same video file
Yes, it's the same one.
And once again, without applying the latest lavf/qtpalette patch the
following (original from the QuickTime Beta CD) file w
On 01/02/2016 03:05 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
[...]
Furthermore, as I have written before, the 1-bit mode is not fully
implemented/partly broken (the jagginess on the right edge shouldn't
be there), but many files play OK in spi
On 01/02/2016 03:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Most interesting. I run Windows XP and MacOS 7.5 here for testing,
so they are relatively old references. I suspect something has
changed in the QuickTime Animation decoder in QuickTime since then.
please run md5sum on your file and tell me the
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
[...]
> Furthermore, as I have written before, the 1-bit mode is not fully
> implemented/partly broken (the jagginess on the right edge shouldn't
> be there), but many files play OK in spite of this.
has this been reported on trac.ffmp
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 02:20:12PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 02:15 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >no, there is no white background with quicktime player 10.4 on a
> >macbook air with the file i have
>
> Most interesting. I run Windows XP and MacOS 7.5 here for testing,
> so th
On 01/02/2016 02:15 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
no, there is no white background with quicktime player 10.4 on a
macbook air with the file i have
Most interesting. I run Windows XP and MacOS 7.5 here for testing, so
they are relatively old references. I suspect something has changed in
the
On 01/02/2016 02:09 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 01/02/2016 01:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
One of the major peculiarities in my book is that the two blue
colors in the video sample description and the white background are
THREE colors together. Not exactly what I would call 1-bit video. I
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 02:09:36PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 01:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >>One of the major peculiarities in my book is that the two blue
> >>colors in the video sample description and the white background are
> >>THREE colors together. Not exactly
On 01/02/2016 01:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
One of the major peculiarities in my book is that the two blue
colors in the video sample description and the white background are
THREE colors together. Not exactly what I would call 1-bit video. I
have absolutely no idea what they are doing in
Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
> I will thus apply this patch unless there are
> some objections
Please remove the Google Drive links from the
commit message.
(File names would be useful but as said, two
different samples with the same name exist.)
A remaining issue that may not
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:34:02AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 08:35 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >On 12/30/2015 08:17 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>When comparing the output in QuickTime and FFmpeg, I noticed that the
> >>background is blue in FFmpeg, while it is white (or tr
On 12/30/2015 08:35 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 12/30/2015 08:17 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
When comparing the output in QuickTime and FFmpeg, I noticed that the
background is blue in FFmpeg, while it is white (or transparent, if you
will) in QuickTime. Hold your horses on this patch.
Mats
I
On 12/30/2015 08:17 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
When comparing the output in QuickTime and FFmpeg, I noticed that the
background is blue in FFmpeg, while it is white (or transparent, if you
will) in QuickTime. Hold your horses on this patch.
Mats
I noticed that the "alpha" component (there is
On 12/29/2015 11:08 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
The following patch fixes the lack of palettized display of 1-bit video
in the qtrle decoder. It is related to my previous patch of
lavf/qtpalette, which added 1-bit video to the "palettized video"
category. As far as I can see, everything works fine,
On 12/29/2015 11:54 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
Below are links to sample files, which should now be
displayed properly with bluish colors
Just to make sure:
Please do not apply this patch until above is clarified.
Carl Eugen
I'm not the one to apply it.
Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
> Below are links to sample files, which should now be
> displayed properly with bluish colors
Just to make sure:
Please do not apply this patch until above is clarified.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffm
On 12/29/2015 11:48 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Could you explain what "should" means in
above sentence?
Please try to answer this question, do not
repeat things that all developers already
understood when you told us two weeks ago.
This is a whole different issue from the one I was ranti
Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
> On 12/29/2015 11:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
> >
> >> Below are links to sample files, which should now be
> >> displayed properly with bluish colors
> >
> > Sorry, I am not a native speaker:
> > Could you explain what
On 12/29/2015 11:41 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 12/29/2015 11:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
Below are links to sample files, which should now be
displayed properly with bluish colors
Sorry, I am not a native speaker:
Could you explain what "should" means i
On 12/29/2015 11:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
Below are links to sample files, which should now be
displayed properly with bluish colors
Sorry, I am not a native speaker:
Could you explain what "should" means in
above sentence?
Please trim your quotes, Ca
Mats Peterson ffmpeg.org> writes:
> Below are links to sample files, which should now be
> displayed properly with bluish colors
Sorry, I am not a native speaker:
Could you explain what "should" means in
above sentence?
Please trim your quotes, Carl Eugen
The following patch fixes the lack of palettized display of 1-bit video
in the qtrle decoder. It is related to my previous patch of
lavf/qtpalette, which added 1-bit video to the "palettized video"
category. As far as I can see, everything works fine, but comments are
of course welcome.
Below are
23 matches
Mail list logo
