Re: Fonts Again

2019-06-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Bodo Bellut on Sat, 01 Jun 2019 13:43:34 +0200: > Since the upgrade, exmh uses a quite large font which might be a hint > at my age but I digress. I had a similar experience years ago and I solved it by installing Tcl/Tk 8.4 and making Exmh use that. This is what I have always h

Re: How to manage the overwhelming spam issue?

2021-08-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Marc Baaden on Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:50:46 +0200: > Any hints of how to implement such a thing, or something related? I of > course am also grateful for your opinion whether that makes sense or > if there are better options. Are you using any of the bayesian capabilities of SpamAss

Re: How to manage the overwhelming spam issue?

2021-08-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Marc Baaden on Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:56:49 +0200: > What I want to achieve for those for example is to add a simple button > in EXMH that when I have identified one such message, the sender email > can be added to my spamassassin blacklist for example. I have a menu item in my EXMH that

Re: Delivering mail through nmh via SMTP...

2021-08-17 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said David Levine on Tue, 17 Aug 2021 05:28:29 -0700: > Starting with nmh 1.7, nmh defaults to port 587 instead of 25 for SMTP > submission. Personally I think this was a mistake. SMTP is port 25, SUBMISSION is port 587. If something says SMTP, what comes to mind is port 25, not 587.

Re: Delivering mail through nmh via SMTP...

2021-08-17 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 17 Aug 2021 18:50:01 -0600: > Thus said David Levine on Tue, 17 Aug 2021 05:28:29 -0700: > > > Starting with nmh 1.7, nmh defaults to port 587 instead of 25 for > > SMTP submission. > > Personally I think this was a mistake. SMT

Re: Delivering mail through nmh via SMTP...

2021-08-17 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ken Hornstein on Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:01:18 -0400: > 587 is the port that is supposed to be used by MUAs to submit mail. > nmh is a MUA; it seems perfectly logical to me that the default that > is used by nmh is the submission port. Yeah, I can see your point though I still think it was

Re: Issue with quoting multipart messages

2022-12-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Marc Baaden on Fri, 09 Dec 2022 08:28:23 +0100: > For some messages, when I reply to the sender quoted, I get an > unreadable quote in base64, although the initial message contained > plain text. I have not a complete view under which precise conditions > this happens, but t

Re: Issue with quoting multipart messages

2022-12-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Marc Baaden on Fri, 09 Dec 2022 17:06:07 +0100: > My EXMH version is 2.8.0. I'm still using 2.7.2. Not sure if perhaps a bug exists in later versions. > I am not sure I understand how you reply, and what shortcut > corresponds to (I don't seem to have it on my versi

Re: Issue with quoting multipart messages

2022-12-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ken Hornstein on Fri, 09 Dec 2022 11:06:59 -0500: > I'm a LITTLE puzzled by Andy's response ... Andy, are you using sedit? Yes, I primarily use sedit for composing and responding to messages. Occasionally when I need more control over the message I will use More->Alternate Ed

Re: Exmh blocked by browser

2023-05-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Dave Close on Wed, 10 May 2023 21:25:39 -0700: > Now the new browser opens as expected but exmh is blocked until I > close the browser's window. I get the same behavior even if I try to > return to the original browser. What could I be doing wrong? Try running the command from an