I am just starting to use Evolution (2.4.0 from SUSE10) and mostly
like it very much. However, I have the exchange connector configured,
and there are some things that really bug me.
1)when I start evolution for the 1st time after booting the PC, it is
SO SLOW! It takes forever for it to be r
On 4/28/06, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1)when I start evolution for the 1st time after booting the PC, it is
SO SLOW! It takes forever for it to be ready to display my
messages.
In other words, it is so slow, that I login to OWA with FireFox to
read my email, for the
On 4/28/06, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/28/06, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1)when I start evolution for the 1st time after booting the PC, it is
> SO SLOW! It takes forever for it to be ready to display my
> messages.
more detail
On 4/28/06, Ritesh Khadgaray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
one probable reason is imap, and second is virtual folder
these two slow down evolution.
meaning, that lmap is configured as a supported protocol in evolution,
and if I turn it off, it will help? And, what is "virtual folder"?
I have look
On 4/29/06, Joost Kraaijeveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
A me-too post. I do not use IMAP or virtual folders, have a snappy OWA
response using Firefox, but for daily use I run a W2K VMWare session with
Outlook 2000 to handle my email as the Evolution response is (nearly)
unworkable.
I
On 5/3/06, cbrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
connected evolution to my corporate ms exchanger server. when i delete
mails in ms outlook they move to a "Deleted" folder. where does evo put
them?
___
ummm,
the "deleted items" folder, I believe ...
P
This list appears to be pretty slow. I'm wondering if there is another
"evolution" specific list and/or a forum, where I might have better
luck finding out about the exchange connector and it's [initital]
slowness.
I have heard such good things about evo, and have liked the features
of it so far,
On 5/3/06, cbrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would have thought that, but no. There are only 16 old-old
messages in there.
No, wait. I seem to have inadvertently typed the word "golf" into the
filtering text field.
Uh. Never mind.
lol!
boy, do I know THAT feeling!
;-)
_
On 5/8/06, Paul Lemmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am clearly not understanding a couple things and need some
clarification.
Here is my goal: I wish to copy the entire message to local storage when
it is found on the exchange server.
Since evo is so slow to "get started" I am hoping for this
On 5/8/06, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As soon as I went off-line, I then went back on-line, and -- without
prompting for password -- evo connected to my exchange account, and
began synching. That's when I set the local download for tons of
folders and it is now ...
On 5/8/06, Justin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
backwards - what do i mean?
normally when i type gnome it appears as gnome, but when i reply to a
html email and i type gnome it appears as emong
wow -- lol!
yes i know html email is evil and yes i could change the reply style
to attach th
On 5/4/06, Sushma Rai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you file a defect on this, with the details like, how big is
your mailbox, approximately how many mails/folders/filters you have etc.
how do I go about filing a defect? I have app 8000+ emails and 30
folders. No filters.
I have marked all t
On 5/9/06, Murray Trainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have installed the following RPMS's from
http://ftp.novell.co.jp/pub/suse/suse/i386/supplementary/GNOME/update_for_10.0/yast-source
this is interesting, as I am unable to install evo 2.6 when using:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i
On 5/9/06, Murray Trainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Peter,
Forgot to mention I got the gtkhtml2 rpm from 10.1 repository here
http://ftp.novell.co.jp/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586
AHHH .. So you were prompted with the dependency error, too, and then
went
using SUSE 10 with evo 2.4.0 and the exchange connector.
Any ideas how to get around this? (see attached for error)
I can't upgrade evo until novell fixes the supplementary repos --
there is a a dependency error when trying to upgrade.
Peter
evo-error-subscribe.png
Description: PNG image
This morning, I tried to accept an appointment invite. It crashed evo.
Now, after a restart of the machine, evo will not start at all.
It "trys to" ... and then just quietly goes away.
Where should I look for a log? Is it likely that there is anything I
can do, short of re-installing?
Peter
___
On 5/15/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
can you please get a E2K_DEBUG=4 trace - see the sections "To attach gdb
to a running process" and "Exchange Connector Debug" at
http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/bugs.shtml for the details.
I'll do this tommorow, as I am not on the lan at
On 5/15/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Naaah, no re-installing needed, this isn't Micros~ Windows. ;-)
Now there are quite some ways to start debugging this and at hunt down
the real cause.
Andre,
thank you so much for the detailed response ... I have filed this post
away unde
On 5/19/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is html mail, not word-processor mail.
oh, yuck
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On 5/15/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, so this happens when subscribing to another user's calendar.
can you please get a E2K_DEBUG=4 trace - see the sections "To attach gdb
to a running process" and "Exchange Connector Debug" at
http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/bugs.shtml f
On 5/22/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, it's just what it says: there is no such file. it's the wrong place
you're looking for. i *assume* (i don't have evolution-exchange
installed) that it's located at
/opt/gnome/libexec/evolution-exchange-storage
on my system, there
On 5/22/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, it's just what it says: there is no such file. it's the wrong place
you're looking for. i *assume* (i don't have evolution-exchange
installed) that it's located at
/opt/gnome/libexec/evolution-exchange-storage
I guess at this poi
On 5/22/06, pnayak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
type rpm -ql evolution-exchange-2.6.0-27 | grep
evolution-exchange-storage, this will display path
of exchange,
p02-dcs13:~ # rpm -ql evolution-exchange-2.6.0-27 | grep
evolution-exchange-storage
p02-dcs13:~ #
hmm ... displayed nothing
I have al
On 5/23/06, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I am not the guy with the right answer but could you try
inspecting if Edit->Plugins->Exchange Operations is enabled when you hit
this error.
nice try! ;-)
yes, it is enabled. I am in the midst right now of putting an IDM 3
propo
On 5/27/06, Sander van Loon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, my request is, maybe the developers should focus more on fixing bugs
and fine-tuning the existing functionality instead of implementing new
features?
I agree. Much to like, but ...
___
Evolu
On 8/17/06, Sushma Rai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what is the issue you are observing while you try to access other user's
> calendar. Please file a bug report on this with the details of error
> message displayed. Also i suggest you to use 2.6.3.
>
I can't access shared calendars, either, usin
On 8/17/06, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> evolution-brutus 1.1.6 is now available. This Evolution plugin provides
> Outlook level access to Exchange 5.5, 2000, 2003 and 2007 from Evolution
> 2.4 and 2.6.
>
pardon me, but I don't get it.
Is this a replacement for the "exchange
On 8/17/06, William Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Evo 2.6.3 will not help with that I fear. At least it didn't for me.
> Its a shame, but personally I think the connector
>* Reliability
>* Start time
>* Memory footprint
> are higher priorities..
*sigh*
it is getting harder and
On 8/17/06, Sawler, Blair T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Is the Windows version still being supported?
since when is there a windows version? I saw an interview last year
that spoke of working on one, targeting this fall possibly but
have heard nothing since
Peter
_
On 8/17/06, Sawler, Blair T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My apologies it is version 2.6.2
>
ok, I'll bite ... where do you get this download? I do not see it at:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/
and googling for evolution email windows got me a couple interviews
that mention it, but
On 8/17/06, Sawler, Blair T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Info here: http://shellter.sourceforge.net/evolution/
>
> Download here:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=159440&package_id=1943
> 80&release_id=429758
>
interesting... this does not look "official" from Novell or fro
On 8/17/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Official" binaries for the "normal" 32-bit Microsoft Windows are
> available on the Gnome FTP site, please see
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/desktop/2.14/2.14.2/win32 -
> check out the README files first. Please note that Novell does not
>
On 8/21/06, James Pifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone using a Verizon XV6700 PDA/Phone? I'm looking at getting one.
> Being a Windows Mobile device with Outlook, does anyone know if there's
> any type of integration with Fedora/Evolution?
>
> I don't think I would want a lot, but I would like
Is it possible (or at least, is is SUPPOSED to be) to schedule
resources with evo and the exchange connector? Is anyone doing this
successfully?
I cannot open a shared calendar, so I am not sure whether this is
supposed to work? It appears as though I can get free/busy for users,
even though I can
On 9/6/06, Polcari, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2.6 I can schedule just fine.
> I cannot open shared calendars either.
>
that's cool, thank you. So doing a free/busy search on a resource or
against another users calendar, just works?
Do you have any idea what has to be done so that the gl
On 9/6/06, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have any idea what has to be done so that the global catalogue
> is available over the internet?
folks -- is it just ldap availability that is required for the
exchange connector to talk to the Glob
Is there a way to schedule resources when using the exchange
connector? What happens is that the calendar invitation is sent with
the resouce being listed as an invitee. I am told this is a limitation
of Outlook Web Access
apparently when using "LookOut", this is not what happens, and so the
On 9/11/06, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An evolution-brutus (e-b) account can coexist with an evolution-exchange
> account. As for whether the scheduling of resources will work...
interesting ... I would assume that both will try to retrieve email,
calendar, etc ... I suppose then
On 9/11/06, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm fairly convinced that you need some client side magic as well...
>
yes, that is my hunch as well ... so then I guess the question becomes
one for the evo developers:
I have a customer (small, about 100 users initially) wanting to move
off
On 9/11/06, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is on mine. It is actually fairly close to the top. What are your
> deadline here?
>
well we are in an evaluation period with the customer, through early
october. Basically, we are helping them to validate whether or not
SLED with Open Of
Can someone help me understand why I might choose one or the other of
these methods to connect evo to exchange?
Does e-brutus offer functionality that that e-exchange does not? Or,
the other way around?
Peter
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-li
On 9/11/06, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would dearly love this capability as well; as it stands I need to reboot
> to Windows on order to schedule a meeting!
>
> However, someone else here mentioned it wasn't possible to do this through
> OWA either; is that true? If so I don't see
On 9/11/06, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is on mine. It is actually fairly close to the top. What are your
> deadline here?
Jules,
I guess I did not really realize until now that you must be the magic
behind Brutus, yes?
Both the server and b-e?
Have you had discussions with
On 9/11/06, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone help me understand why I might choose one or the other of
> these methods to connect evo to exchange?
>
> Does e-brutus offer functionality that that e-exchange does not? Or,
> the other way around?
>
I
On 9/12/06, Joe Polcari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >From what I understand from my Exchange guy,
> he had to set auto-accept on the resource mailbox.
> It will also auto-reject on scheduling conflicts.
>
excellent ... that is just what we wanted to test. We'll still test
it, but I have conf
On 9/11/06, Joe Polcari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Auto accept for Resources on Exchange works in Evo and OWA.
> At least it does in Evo 2.6.3.
Joe, would that be after explicitly setting the auto-accept properties
on the resource mail box? Or, are you saying that "it just works" like
in Out
On 9/12/06, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm.
>
> So, I verified with my IT folks that auto-accept and auto-reject are set
> and free/busy info are being published for our conference rooms. I can see
> the free/busy for the conference room when I add it as an attendee.
>
> I've tried res
On 9/15/06, J. Lee Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't take this the wrong way, but this is something that has frustrated
> me for a while about evolution, even though I'm a HUGE fan.
>
> I really want to be able to say that Evolution is great for corporate
> use, but it's hard to say that whe
On 10/28/06, Ambrogio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, now the problems are:
> 1. When I'm out of the office I can use the account only by OWA and not
> by outlook.
>Is this also true for evolution connector?
>
the evolution connector uses OWA ... you point evo at the OWA url and
then login.
On 11/9/06, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Smith,
>
> Can you file a bug on exchange connector? A bug will help us exchange
> patches/test comments.
>
so is this comment a way of saying "it is supposed to work, please
disregard the message that the program is giving"?
Or --
On 1/5/07, Eric Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to get my evolution upgraded to 2.8 for the past three
> days and it is making me very frustrated. I'm installing from source, well
> trying too, and I believe I am doing it right. At least it's how I was told
> to do it. But
On 1/5/07, Eric Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to configure my evolution data server, which I believe is the
> first step in upgrading my evolution to 2.8. I can not figure out how to
> install it now. Do I use install-sh and if i do, what is the exact command.
> I've tried doing
On 1/14/07, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Configure evolution-data-server using the --with-openldap option or else
> libexchange-storage won't be built.
>
>$ ./configure --with-openldap
in general, how does one know, when trying to compile from source,
which options to use?
On 1/23/07, Hans van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same prob here - I use Thunderbird at home (GMail POP) and
> forced to use Evolution in our MS only office. Evolution (2.8.2) is
> slow and crashes regularly (well not Evol, the backend service) - I
> think its because the Jun
On 1/23/07, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just to throw more fuel on this:
I used the evo version (and exch connector) that came with SUSE 10.0
... and had the following issues:
1)really really slow startup (excruciating)
2)"generic error" subscribing to another
On 1/23/07, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh, yah ...
and half the time, when our schedulers add something to my calendar, I
have to shut down EVO before I can see the new appointment. Which then
means, waiting
On 1/23/07, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Despite that gentoo evo 2.8 branch is masked, it's noticeably better
> than 2.6
well, that's good to hear, anyway. Though the OPs experience seems to
be not that great. Now if I could figure out how to resolve the
dependency errors when I try to ins
On 1/24/07, Sankar P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2.8.3 has got some performance fixes w.r.t initial folder fetching. If
> you have a lot of public/nested folders, you will notice the startup
> time reduced considerably with 2.8.3It is getting released on
> Jan-29th.
>
> These fixes have alre
On 1/24/07, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I'm obviously biased here but I have a test environment with 4000+
> messages per folder and evolution-brutus can work with that with no
> problems whatsoever.
>
> Anyway, I'm responsive so if you decide to try out e-b than I'm here to
> h
On 1/24/07, William Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies.
> I just re-compiled 2.9.6 on a second PC, using the same script
> as worked on the first. (scp -p ) But in this second PC I have a
> 'subscribe to others users folder' option. It still gives 'generic
> error' though when I
On 2/13/07, Hans van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a stretch, but what if the components that is needed for MAPI
> can be run in Wine?
I think the point is that, since it's job is to connect to exchange
(which runs on windows only) it should not be that big a deal to
either:
1)
On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I understand the need for an Exchange client
> under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer
> attention from the rest of Evo.
>From the perspective of hoping to drive Linux desktop adoption into
the corpor
On 2/21/07, Void Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a brutus mailing list or forum that I can get
> brutus help or is the evolution-list an appropriate
> list?
the brutus developer seems to haunt (and chime in about Brutus) on the
evolution-list.
Peter
__
On 2/24/07, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My company is switching from a pop server to Exchange, and I'd prefer to
> continue using Evolution. Is there a way I can import my local mail into my
> Exchange account, preferably preserving my folder structure? I copied an
> email and pasted it int
On 2/16/07, Tom Pride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However the team that I work within also needs accesses to an MS
> Exchange shared mailbox. Firstly, can Evolution cannect to a shared
> mailbox? I've tried using the "Subsrcibe to other users folder"
> option but this does not seem to work. Is t
On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
> closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic.
I find that pretty amazing. The connector project has the "feel" of
not being high priority, and this just validates i
On 2/26/07, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What all features/functionalities that you use extensively in Exchange?
calendar:
issues:
currently if our schedulers add an item to my calendar, I can't see it
until I restart evo
can't view another users schedule (subscribe to that u
On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might
> even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before
> resorting to a downgrade. But the bottom line is I need to be able to
> do my day-to-day work also,
On 3/14/07, José Oliver Segura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After googling and googling, I've not found nothing about this, but
> I'm not sure why (as long as it seems) I'm the only one having this
> problem (or, at least, the only one that sends e-mails to the list)
you are not the only one. I
On 3/15/07, P Chenthill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>We are not currently doing much bug fixes in the version which
> your using. Please upgrade your evolution to the latest stable version
> which is evolution-2.10. It has all the latest timezone updates.
I am amazed at the hutz
RH provides
packages to do this?
If this is the case, then RH essentially upgrades GNOME at the same
time that EVO is updated?
See below for an exchange I had earlier on this list. In this case, it
sounds as though it would just be "too much to ask" to get the updated
evo in SLED 10:
On
On 3/26/07, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exceptions to the rule have been made, however, and there is some talk
> of whether it would make sense to upgrade the major desktop applications
> (Firefox, OpenOffice, and Evolution) at some point before RHEL 6. I'm
> in favor of that; it
On 3/27/07, Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are on SLED10 or 10.1 or 10.2, then this is the bug you should be
> looking into. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251573 There
> is an update to Evolution 2.6.0 on SLED10.
"Access Denied
You are not authorized to acce
On 4/24/07, Ari El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When composing a new email, after typing the first 5 characters of a
> name, I get a 7 seconds (!!) delay in which the composing window becomes
> totally unresponsive, until I get the list of matches. Every new character I
> add or delete, I get a
On 6/20/07, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That is good to hear. The upgrade to Exchange 2007 was inevitable for
> most companies and mine got chomped into it as well.
>
> Looking forward to the new release
you call this good news, huh?
The fact that many many months after release o
On 6/20/07, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It would be ideal if it could bypass OWA and just access the MAPI
> > interface. Maybe the Openchange MAPI libs will help to achieve this.
> >
> > http://www.openchange.org/
> >
> That is definitely the future direction of Evolutio
On 8/16/07, Nicole Haora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please stop sending info
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
go to the page whose link appears immediately above
On Jan 13, 2008 10:15 PM, Rick Bilonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Evolution seems to lose advantages it used to have by the day. When they
> changed the Exchange server here from 2003 to 2007 about a week ago,
> Evolution no longer works - it can't access Exchange 20007 - no one on
> the list
On Jan 17, 2008 2:07 PM, Rob Cambra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People sitting at desks in real companies want and demand collaboration tools
> such as Exchange, Lotus Domino, GroupWize, etc. Evo better be the client
> side equivalent for open source and be rock solid in those environments or i
On Jan 21, 2008 4:53 AM, Pete Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It saddens me to see the Evo developers chasing Microsoft's tail all the
> time - it is exactly the scenario that Microsoft want: the perception
> that they are the leader and everyone has to follow them. I wish there
yes, I under
2009/8/23 Brian J. Murrell :
> I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
> the next major release (2.6.28)?
I would not hold my breath -- it has been like this for the several
years that I struggled trying to use it. Access to an Exchange mailbox
that is large is eve
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I don't use Exchange so I don't really have anything useful to say, but
> just as a general comment, "large" means different things to different
> people so you might want to be more specific.
>
1 - 2 GB during the time I was strugglin
82 matches
Mail list logo
