On 1/24/07, Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I'm obviously biased here but I have a test environment with 4000+ > messages per folder and evolution-brutus can work with that with no > problems whatsoever. > > Anyway, I'm responsive so if you decide to try out e-b than I'm here to > help.
I will definitly try the brutus route ... I want to exhaust what can be done with the native exchange connector first, so that I can compare "best to best" ... While I have not yet seriously sat down to figure out how to deploy/use brutus, I have looked through the docs a bit, and have struggled to come to a "big picture" understanding of how it is architected ... I've got a couple questions, do you have a moment to address them? 1)Brutus must run on a windows box, which can but need not be an exchange box. Correct? 2)What "high level" kinds of config changes must be done on the exchange side? Any user accounts required? Any connectors defined, etc? 3)Can an EVO installation, use both the "exchange connector" and "brutus" at the same time? (or is there an easy way to switch back and forth, just for testing simplicity)? 4)is there a list of features/compromises that users will experience that is compared to the experience using the exchange connector? Peter _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
