Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Ralf Mardorf-2 [via Gnome Evolution - > > What would happen if you would bottom post? Is it more time-consuming > for you? Should the users of the mailing lists you join spend their time > to puzzle through your emails? it's simple. You would have to sometimes scr

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:14 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > But it does sound as though the Evo community has put uptake of Evo > quite a looong way down their list of priorities. Are the priorities > something like this? [...] You seem to be confused about the difference between policy for posting on

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 13:57 -0600, Brian A Anderson wrote: > The reason top posting takes place could have nothing to do with > office > usage it has to do with where the mail editing routines places the > bloody cursor in the the original message. > > In the version of Evolution (3.4.4) that I ru

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Hi :) Sorry about my posts yday!!  I was having a really "bad hair day".  I have seen lists where top-posting does result in very much bullying type of behaviour but i agree it doesn't happen in Evo.  I think it's important to avoid the type of flame-war(ish) type of thing we had yday and am g

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

> > Of course top-posting does make sense to the vast majority of office > workers. Generally they must have some idea of what the question was, > perhaps from the subject-line or because of who (or which list) is > responding. Also it is possible to answer a question in such a way > that gives

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Hi :) Thanks for a much better level of response.  It's more like i would expect from this list.  But it does sound as though the Evo community has put uptake of Evo quite a looong way down their list of priorities.  Are the priorities something like this? 1.  Get all the world to reverse

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

disc u ssio n. On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 22:29 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > Look, this whole argument is tired. This list clearly of this > wants to make it difficult for people to join in. It doesn't want to > deal with people that might have just 1 or 2 questions. It's quite > happy res

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

ng because that is such an important rule to follow that it is worth killing off Evo for.  Regards from Tom :)  > > From: Ralf Mardorf >To: evolution-list@gnome.org >Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013, 21:12 >Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolutio

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Forwarded Message From: Ralf Mardorf To: evolution-list Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:52:07 +0200 On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 19:26 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > See any forums or mailing lists for MS products. >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

gards from Tom :)  > > From: Ralf Mardorf >To: "evolution-list@gnome.org" >Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013, 18:29 >Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system > > >On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:13 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: >> It's just another blo

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:13 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > Of course top-posting does make sense to the vast majority of office workers. > Generally they must have some idea of what the question was, perhaps from > the subject-line or because of who (or which list) is responding. Also it is

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 19:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:13 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > > It's just another blocker that prevents normal office workers from > > potentially using this office program. > > Can you send me a link to a mailing list for the office software those

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:13 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > It's just another blocker that prevents normal office workers from > potentially using this office program. Can you send me a link to a mailing list for the office software those normal office workers use, where top-posting is ok? TIA, Ralf

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

t; From: Ralf Mardorf >To: evolution-list@gnome.org >Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013, 23:39 >Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system > > >Hi Eduardo, > >JFTR your last mail was sent two times, I at least received it two >times. Strange, even if I'm i

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

(PDT) Message-ID: <1374963375.1153.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Eduardo Jauch To: Ralf Mardorf Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 23:16:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1374934777.694.12.camel@archlinux> References: <51f39cbc.3060...@jault.com> <1374922725.1107.3.camel@localhost.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

m13027130wib.10.2013.07.27.15.16.17 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Jul 2013 15:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1374963375.1153.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system From: Eduardo Jauch To: Ralf Ma

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Hi Eduardo, JFTR your last mail was sent two times, I at least received it two times. Strange, even if I'm in the lists of recipients this doesn't happen for my Arch's Evolution, I'm now using an Ubuntu's Evolution. I thought it depends to the settings chosen by the mailman account. However, pleas

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 12:11 +0200, M. Claude Jault wrote: > Hello, > I think Evolution has not a 64 bits version. Is'nt ? It certainly does. It will build on either 32-bit or 64-bit systems. I've been using Evolution on x86_64 exclusively for years now. Works great. > Does Evolution (in 32 bit

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 23:16 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > Sáb, 2013-07-27 às 16:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf escreveu: > > _Please Eduardo Jauch don't top post and use what ever cryptic > > formatting you used._ > I don't know what you mean by "top post",

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Sáb, 2013-07-27 às 16:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf escreveu: > _Please Eduardo Jauch don't top post and use what ever cryptic > formatting you used._ I don't know what you mean by "top post", and don't know what you're talking about when you refer "cryptic formatting". An explanation will be appreciat

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:58 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > I run an Arch Linux 64 bits and I use evolution without problems. I run it on Arch too, since it's open source it can be compiled for 64 bit architecture. The compiling for x86_64 doesn't cause an issue, but I anyway can't confirm that Evol

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:51 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Eduardo, please don't top post. > > +1 > > > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:28 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > > > What do you mean by "special account"? > > Sorry it's my broken Eng

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:51 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Eduardo, please don't top post. > > +1 > > > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:28 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > > > What do you mean by "special account"? > > Sorry it's my broken Eng

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Eduardo, please don't top post. +1 > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:28 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > > What do you mean by "special account"? > Sorry it's my broken English. I've got there accounts one by my provider > Alice and two by Rocketmail

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:28 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > Hi Ralf > What do you mean by "special account"? It is a crazy thing some people do where they change the from/reply-to address when replying to messages based on a whole mess of context [generally as a sneaky and infective way to avoid SPA

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

rom: Eduardo Jauch To: M. Claude Jault Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:58:45 +0100 When I reply to this mail Evolution will chose the Rocketmail account. Forwarded Message From: Eduardo Jauch To:

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

-- > From: Ralf Mardorf _but from the wrong account_ > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system > Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:19:37 +0200 > > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:58 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote: > > I run an Arch Linux 6

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 13:59 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > I think Evolution has not a 64 bits version. Is'nt ? > > > > Does Evolution (in 32 bits version) run perfectly on a 64 bits Linux > > system (as Ubuntu 13.04 64 bits). > > > > All that the Evolution developers do is produce source cod

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

One of the annoying features. There's no way to tell evolution that it should use a special account, when replying to this list. Original message From: Ralf Mardorf _but from the wrong account_ To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

> > I think Evolution has not a 64 bits version. Is'nt ? > > Does Evolution (in 32 bits version) run perfectly on a 64 bits Linux > system (as Ubuntu 13.04 64 bits). > All that the Evolution developers do is produce source code - the compilation and packaging is up to the distro you are using.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Hello Claude, I run an Arch Linux 64 bits and I use evolution without problems. But I think the package for Arch Linux is not built (compiled and creted) by the evolution team, but by Jan de Groot. So, probably there is a 64 bits version in the Ubuntu repositories also... Bye. :) Sáb, 2013-07-2

[Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system

Hello, I think Evolution has not a 64 bits version. Is'nt ? Does Evolution (in 32 bits version) run perfectly on a 64 bits Linux system (as Ubuntu 13.04 64 bits). Thank you in advance for your answers. Kindly.