Hi :)
Look, this whole argument is tired. This list clearly wants to make it
difficult for people to join in. It doesn't want to deal with people that
might have just 1 or 2 questions. It's quite happy restricting itself to the
shrinking pool of people that know of bottom-posting because that is such an
important rule to follow that it is worth killing off Evo for.
Regards from
Tom :)
>________________________________
> From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com>
>To: evolution-list@gnome.org
>Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013, 21:12
>Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system
>
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>From: Ralf Mardorf
>To: evolution-list
>Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system
>Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:52:07 +0200
>
>On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 19:26 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
>> Hi :)
>> See any forums or mailing lists for MS products.
>>
>> It's only the unpopular products that have mailing lists that expect
>> anything else but don't worry about it. You don't want people to use
>> this product. That is not the aim.
>> Regards from
>> Tom :)
>
>"Mailing List Archive
>
>No one has sent a message yet." -
>http://www.meetup.com/Microsoft-Office-Pro-Entrepreneurs/messages/archive/
>
>No hit, when searching for outlook express mailing lists and a forum
>isn't a mailing list.
>
>If you want to troubleshoot, than bottom posting and cutting quotes, at
>least removing signatures, does help to track down an issue. It's not a
>business correspondence and btw. even for business correspondences it is
>more useful to bottom post or to do it the way it is done for snail
>mail, "your reference", "our reference". FWIW the reference, aka thread,
>automatically is included to an email, e.g.
>In-Reply-To: [snip]
>References: [snip] The references seem to make the mail look like spam,
>so I removed them.
>
>It makes me wonder that companies often send a correspondence of 10
>emails including 6 signatures with all the names of the executive board
>by one mail. Nobody does this by snail mail. They should have the
>complete correspondence available on their servers. When it comes to
>collect data by the 10 trackers on their homepages they are able to
>store the data, so it should be possible to store the mails too.
>
>Endless line: I'm not an Internet expert myself. I've got knowledge about
>audio production, I'm clueless about Internet rules. IMO there's nothing to
>learn, we've got references as we've got for snail mail, a logical order to
>understand content is a, b, c and not c, b, a and keep everything human
>readable when ever possible, avoid insane formatting.
>
>What would happen if you would bottom post? Is it more time-consuming
>for you? Should the users of the mailing lists you join spend their time
>to puzzle through your emails?
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>evolution-list mailing list
>evolution-list@gnome.org
>To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
>https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
