On vr, 2006-08-11 at 10:17 -0400, Tod Hagan wrote:
> It must be something with Fedora Core 5, then.
Apparently not ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
On di, 2006-07-25 at 12:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > I would like a command line or the ability to go into the config file
> > and set Evolution to request a return receipt for every message. I have
> > many instances where a return receipt is desirable and I frequently
> > forget to insert
On za, 2006-06-24 at 15:11 +0200, Dirk van Ormondt wrote:
> $ LC_TIME=en_GB evolution &
I do something similar because the American (default) time layout is
both ugly and illogical. Now I have set everyhing to nl_NL except for
LC_MESSAGES; I cannot get used to programs talking dutch to me :-(
>
On vr, 2006-06-23 at 10:52 +0200, Dirk van Ormondt wrote:
> Please, tell me how to set evolution to
> ddmmyy (or yymmdd) and 24-hour format,
man locale
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-lis
On do, 2006-06-22 at 16:55 +0800, Harry Lu wrote:
> Hi,
> Maybe you made Evolution go offline.
> Please check the menu under File, and make sure you are running
> Evolution in online mode.
Please note that on FC5 evolution has a dependency on dbus and hal, with
the apparent reason to m
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 07:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > You really should try to implement this / have this implemented at the
> > mail server level, where you can reject mail before you actually accept
> > it.
>
> Not always possible, and no standard means of interaction (tuning) with
>
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:16 +0300, K. Elo wrote:
> is there any possibilities for configuring the junk mail filtering? I
> would like to have the possibility for *really* moving those mails away
> from my IMAP-inboxes into a separate folder, because now these junk
> mails appear when I use e.g. web
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 21:00 -0400, Poohba wrote:
> email message attachment, "Forwarded message - Did you see a home you
> like?"
> > Forwarded Message
> > From: Crystal Clune and Kelly Skay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Robert Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Did you see a
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:03 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> 256 MB. It should be quite enough for a small-footprint xfce4 (I do not
> run GNOME), a dozen of xterms and one mail program.
>
> Disk activity and even desktop irresponsiveness is not an issue here.
> They can be to some extent explaine
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 02:09 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> I can dig into it if somebody gives me an idea where and how. As of now
> nobody did. I have heard that people do not have sending delays. I am
> glad to hear that. But the reason of me posting to this list is that I
> have.
Unexplained
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:28 -0400, Rob Campbell wrote:
> Ok. I thought I could figure it out but I couldn't. How exactly do I
> do that?
Evolution should only download pictures that are not already in the
message, btw. You should check that first.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic si
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 00:47 +0200, guenther wrote:
> Regarding your undo feature: I know this is a long standing request in
> bugzilla. But interestingly, I (personally) never ever wished for such a
> thing. Since I have "deleted" mail visible [1], undoing this is like one
> click or keyboard short
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 18:48 -0400, Poohba wrote:
> I am unable to get many html emails to show pictures. I have the
> address that the email is coming from in my address book. I have load
> images if sender is in address book enabled. Why am I not able to get
> the pictures in the html emails?
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 03:10 -0700, H.M. Gladney wrote:
> Please, what is the recommended spam filter for use with Evolution in
> a Fedora Core 5 environment?
Postfix in proxy spam filter mode + amavis + spamassassin...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:53 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> > That almost sounds like the SMTP server is doing an ident lookup on you.
>
> No, it's one of the corporate servers not requiring authentication. This
> is why I stat thinking that the delay is due to Evolution
> implementation.
Even i
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 23:47 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Evo deletes messages from the server when you expunge them. Otherwise
> they're just marked for deletion so you can undelete them if you want.
> This is how IMAP is supposed to work. IMAP is explicitly *not* meant to
> keep multiple cl
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 10:19 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> if you can open them, then the server didn't actually expunge them
> yet :)
>
> it also means that the server didn't give Evolution any expunge
> notification untagged responses, which would be WHY they haven't been
> removed from Evolut
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 13:21 -0400, Abel Marrero Santos wrote:
> I've started to use evolution recently and i've a noted that when i try
> to compose a new message, evolution hangs for aproximately 20 seconds
> until the composition windows appears. I don't know if this is the
> correct behaviour b
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 07:59 +1200, Eustace, Glen wrote:
> > I'd rather have to option to not cache at all. My internet
> > connection is fast enough...
>
> I think this would be my preferred option as well. I have 100Mbit
> connections at both locations with desktops and I wouldn't mind the
> la
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 04:38 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> In fact even Send/Receive will not do it, which I for one consider a
> mistake. After all, if the user has explicitly indicated he's willing to
> wait for a potentially slow operation, why not take the opportunity of
> resynching even
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 10:08 +0100, Keith Sharp wrote:
> I also get this repeatedly. I am running a fully up to date FC5:
> evolution-2.6.1 and evolution-data-server-1.6.1.
>
> And I would emphasise that I am not compiling, changing, or installing
> anything either. Just running the versions that
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 11:12 -0400, Don Levey wrote:
> I've got a number of filters set up for my various inboxes, and when I
> -y to manually run those filters they move qualifying messages to the
> appropriate folders (all on IMAP). However, new messages delivered to the
> inbox don't get moved.
Hi,
For some reason evolution (2.6) keeps downloading (and storing!)
messages I read using imap, even though I unmarked "download copy for
offline use" and "synchronise mail locally". I really don't want
evolution to download messages, except for direct display, because these
mail may contain secu
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:52 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:17 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > I agree, and this has been mentioned several times in the past. The big
>
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:43 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 00:01 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> >
> > > - rant on -
> > > html email is only evil 5-7 years ago. Or, today for systems and
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 10:55 -0700, Paul Lemmons wrote:
> After digging a bit on the net I found the answer to this one at:
>
> http://sarwiki.informatik.hu-berlin.de/Thawte_certificate_with_own_private_key
>
> There are a number of hoops to jump through but they do work.
[signature]
Nice, you
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:40 -0700, Paul Lemmons wrote:
> I have a Thawte email certificate and would like to use it with
> Evolution 2.6.1. Anybody else out there got this working?
Yep. See below :-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:16 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Run your own mail server. Lots of people do it, and it's not as
> hard as you think. It also lets you pull mail from your ISP on
> a regular basis, whether you are logged in or not.
>
> Usually (always?) it's run in concert with spamassassi
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I agree, and this has been mentioned several times in the past. The big
> problem as I see it is that there is no *standard* way of telling a mail
> server what is junk and what isn't. Remember that many mail hubs don't
> allow the use
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 00:01 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> - rant on -
> html email is only evil 5-7 years ago. Or, today for systems and users
> that measure storage and processor time, or bandwidth, in terms that
> were prevalent 5-7 years ago.
>
> Today ... html email is required. It is still
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 10:18 +0200, Arne Caspari wrote:
> I seem to miss the point with Evolutions SPAM filtering techniques. Ever
> since I switched from thunderbird to evolution, I try to get the SPAM
> filter to work.
>
> Using the spamassassin plugin, all I see is that it drastically slows
> d
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:11 +0100, William Murray wrote:
> > > Does anyone know whether evolution 2.6 can be run
> > > on a RedHat Enterprise Linux 3 system, without fiddling with glib
> > > etc?
> > >The package config requires glib > 2.6, and I have glib2-2.2.3
> > > I don't want
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 15:52 +0100, William Murray wrote:
> Hello guys,
> Does anyone know whether evolution 2.6 can be run
> on a RedHat Enterprise Linux 3 system, without fiddling with glib
> etc?
>The package config requires glib > 2.6, and I have glib2-2.2.3
> I don't want to
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 11:38 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 15:31 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > > All this
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely suboptimal, because
> > any well-run server will be doing it server-side.
>
> Indeed. _Determining_ junk belongs on the s
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 01:15 +0200, guenther wrote:
> The issue is, that the Secure Connections options are named badly, or
> rather used to be (getting back to this). Always means SSL (port 993),
> Whenever Possible means StartTLS -- which IIRC starts with port 143 and
> uses 993 later on, or some
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 14:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >The question is rather: what is wrong with your imap server!
>
> I hope nothing :-)
>
> >It doesn't listen to the imap port. The outlook clients probably use
> the
> >windows proprietary mail exchange protocol instead.
>
> It listen
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 14:03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When trying the same with a outlook client there is no problem, and I'm
> able to read messages and send messages.
>
> What could be wrong with the configuration in Evolution.
The question is rather: what is wrong with your imap server
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 20:28 -0500, Neil McLeod wrote:
> I was also wondering if Evolution is generally good with linebreaking,
> so that the recipients of my messages do not get lines of uneven
> length.
To ensure proper email line length wrapping, select all of your text and
then select "normal"
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 02:51 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:42 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 08:39, Saikat Guha wrote:
> > > The question then becomes, am I correct in concluding that Evolution
> > > cannot properly sync with up with IMAP without a three
I can't get the LDAP address book working on Active Directory using Evo
2.6. I did all the steps as described in various web documents, on
startup evo asks for a password and then either I get a not-so-clear
error message or I get "no results". I tried port 389 and port 3268.
Tethereal shows no ne
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 14:19 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> This is yet another Perfect Reason why the toolbar should be user
> configurable:
> I don't give a rat's butt about the Evo junk filters, thus, I
> don't need those buttons.
>
> I do, though, see the need for a Reply To List
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 11:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Solution: either run only one client at a time, or apply filters
> > > manually (Ctrl-Y).
> >
> > It would be nice if this feature could be optionally enabled...
>
> What feature? This is the way IMAP works, it's not a feature of
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 09:48 -0500, Eric Beversluis wrote:
> Sorry-I forgot to Clear a search. :(
Known problem ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/ma
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 07:12 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Evo only filters messages it considers "new". "Newness" is a state
> maintained by the IMAP server and means it has not previously reported
> the message *to any client*, so if you have two or more clients
> concurrently active on the
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:10 +0200, Hans wrote:
> How do I get Evol to load images from the web thats embedded in an
> email?
> I am behind a firewall, but can get out with a username and passwd.
> I have already setup the proxy stuff for KDE and Gnome and have "Always
> load images from the Interne
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 12:49 +0100, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eache time I send someone the output of programs or source code
> Evolution wraps the lines at 80 (?) chars, rendering the text virtually
> unreadable.
>
> Is it possible to change the line length wrap in Evolution, without
> r
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 14:33 +0100, Ati Rosselet wrote:
> Hi.. I had a problem importing certificates in version 2.2.x.. and
> assumed that it was the verion. I just upgraded to 2.4.1.. and the
> problem is still there. I am using SuSE 9.3.
>
> When I go to import a certificate, it nicely asks for
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 22:59 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> Speaking of that - I've found that for some reason, when you click the
> seal, the text in the window that pops up can't be copied and pasted.
> This is an inconvenience because I would like to be able to search for
> the public key on a keyser
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 16:25 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Ye, "Standard Font" isn't really my definition of HTML mail fonts? Or is
> this one of those "many users doing something wrong" = "standard way of
> doing" from now on?
Yet it works this way. Evolution uses the gnome application default font
for HTM
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 15:15 +0200, Hans wrote:
> I'm the sole Evolution user in a sea of Outlook clients that sends
> MS-HTML formatted mails around.
> My issue is that my "normal" mail display font is nicely tuned to
> display perfectly on my hi-res laptop LCD and the HTML mails are always
> one o
> My old filters work fine, but any new filters added are not executed on
> received mail - I have to manually > Select All > Apply Filters to get
> it to work.
> Any ideas?
Did you check the _order_ in which the filters are applied? Do you have
a filter that sets "stop processing" that matches to
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:36 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Last tricky one. What if I have 20 known (repeating) spam messages, can
> I Junk them over and over again to up the count on those specific
> contents?
> In other words, if I have messages I get over and over again, can I
> "fool" SA by marking the
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 19:27 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
> > Ok, but still, won't marking "new" messages as not-Junk also make SA do
> > the analysis?
> I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution - if
> it's not sure it won't flag it as junk. Hence telling it something isn'
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 01:51 +0100, guenther wrote:
> A hack-ish workaround to train Bayes using Evo is the following: Pick at
> least 200 non-Junk messages, and keep them in mind. Now mark them as
> Junk using the Evo UI. Go to your Junk folder, and mark all those
> non-Junk mail we just abused in
I now know why I couldn't find the bug report on gnome-pilot in the
evolution bugzilla; it's not there ;-)
It's here instead:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157830
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Evolutio
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 15:30 +0100, Al Active wrote:
> Once or twice a week my Evo 2.4 2.4.0 (evolution --version; in SuSE 10.0
> purchased boxed version with regular YOU updates to date) slows down the
> complete system to almost standstill with very high disk access. Only
> with Ctrl-Alt-F2 -> ps
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 22:52 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Trying to reproduce a bug. Can anyone please reply to this message and
> > provide some Greek text? I'd need a few Greek words/chars in
> >
> > * the subject (please change the subject)
> > * the mail body
> > * the from address
> >
> > TIA f
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:03 -0500, Vandor, Steven A wrote:
> I recently upgraded to NLD9 SP2, and evolution stopped working. It
> fails at start-up with a message that it cannot find libplc4.so, which
> resides in the /opt/firefox directory. Does anyone know where
> evolution is looking? Can I just
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Is there a specific reason why this doesn't happen automatically?
> > > So you can undelete stuff?
> > But it's moved to the trash can anyway?
>
> In Evo Trash is a virtual folder (like Junk). The messages are not
> physically c
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:53 +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > That would be the way, BUT gnome-pilot support for palm has been broken
> > for over a year now and nobody seems to care.
> And frankly no one will care if your idea of a bug report is to say "it
> doesn't work".
My bugzilla entry
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 13:35 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > That would be the way, BUT gnome-pilot support for palm has been broken
> > for over a year now and nobody seems to care.
>
> On your distro maybe ;)
>
> It works fine on Mandriva 2006, I use it every morning..
I compiled and installe
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:30 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > > > BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server?
> &g
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server?
>
> It will sync all the deleted messages in the selected folder with the
> server and Expunge them
Is there a specific reason why this doesn't happen automatica
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:16 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'd still like a specific "Sync" action though, preferably per-server.
> AFAIK Send/Receive doesn't do it.
That's a nice concept actually. Make an option to select whether "sync"
only fetches new mail but also completely syncs all se
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:22 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> We had something in mind (and experimental code too) to solve this
> issue. What happens when Evolution is 'shutdown' (closed/quit/whatever)
> is that it tries to sync up any changes made locally to the Remote IMAP
> server. We trie
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 03:27 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
> Install gnome-pilot, evolution and evolution-pilot package. Run
> evolution, and choose Edit->"Synchronization Option". Configure your
> device and conduits. Press hotsync button and you are done.
That would be the way, BUT gnome-p
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:31 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > The problem is when you want to use it to learn ham. Apparently it was
> > not designed for that, it looks like it was designed to undo a previous
> > "junk"-button-press, because only then something actually happens, being
> > the
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 03:13 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Hi fellow Greek speakers,
>
> Trying to reproduce a bug. Can anyone please reply to this message and
> provide some Greek text? I'd need a few Greek words/chars in
>
> * the subject (please change the subject)
> * the mail body
> * the from add
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 17:08 -0500, Kelly J. Morris wrote:
> > Anyone have some links or advice in getting evolution to sync with a
> > palm?
>
> Last time I posed this question, folks recommended MultiSync:
>
> http://multisync.sourceforge.net/news.php
Multisync works well with irmc (mobile phon
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 13:14 -0800, Mindy Fillmore wrote:
> Anyone have some links or advice in getting evolution to sync with a
> palm? I have had some luck with kpilot already, and hoping they get out
> kitchensync soon. Until then, gnomepilot and how to get evolution to
> sync with kpilot and my
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 20:49 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > I've had various issues that caused nasty data loss with evolution 2.4.
> I assume you filed bugs at bugzilla.gnome.org for all of em, didn't you?
At least one. Then I switched back to a known stable version very
quickly, I did not want to jeo
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:12 +0100, J.L. Blom wrote:
> Maybe a stupid question but can anybody give me the reason why Fedora
> update ignores evolution (but updates e.g. Ooo)? I'm still using 2.2.3
> and I have the feeling that a lot f wonderful things (but also nasty
> things!) are not in this vers
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 16:06 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > And how about this one: It seems that the "not junk" button only can
> > mark messages "not junk" that have been marked as "junk" previously
> > (although it doesn't say anything like this).
>
> reading your message, i could use both "jun
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:31 -0600, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> > I shut down my notebook without first exiting evolution and that lead
> > to the new corruption. Deleting the index files caused new ones to be
> > generated.
>
> Why can't Linux handle
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 21:28 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Depends on version and distribution. A good starting point is to find
> > the file "local.cf" inside some spamassassin directory (wherever that
> > may be on your system). It usually resides in /etc/spamassassin
> > or /etc/mail/spamassassin.
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 17:36 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > It would have been nice if evolution had somehow warned me that the junk
> > button was doing nothing because it could not find spamassassin, but
> > maybe the ubuntu people did something to suppress that.
>
> True, good suggestion. I just ste
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
> > sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
> > clean up. Only then does it ki
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 23:55 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Note: The composer only shows contacts for auto-completion, if they
> actually happen to have an email address set. Please check your imported
> contacts -- do they have an email address set, if you open 'em in the
> contact editor?
Ow, complet
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> A different issue is what happens if you lose power or just close the
> laptop lid without warning. Not all Linux distros handle
> suspend-and-resume gracefully.
This is merely a matter of suspend-to-disk or suspend-to-ram actually
w
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 18:54 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > But Evo takes a long time to exit (30 seconds or so) as it waits until
> > exit time to purge and write out all mail folders. Most distros don't
> > give processes nearly this long to exit.
>
> True, and in fact some versions used
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 18:47 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Reseaching elsewhere, the concensus is that Evolution is NOT what I
> > want/need. Evolution is an Outlook alternative. Outlook never met
> > my requirements, and I would not leave Eudora.
>
> No. Evolution is *not* "an Outlook alternative
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 05:26 -0800, David Bicking wrote:
> So is spamassassin a seperate package? Would it be
> listed as a depencency that would be installed when
> evolution was installed? From what I read, it sounded
> like the filtering was built in to evolution, not an
> external call to anothe
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:01 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:03 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> > > Is there a way of setting up a message filter that says "if the sender
> >
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yep. Blame spamassassin ;-) This is used by evolution to filter junk.
> > Tweak spamassassin to your likings and evolution will follow.
> When activating the "Include remote tests", does it activate
> Spamassassin only?
AFAIK this a
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:31 -0500, David Bicking wrote:
> Can anybody point me to documentation on how evolution handles junk
> mail? Meaning what rules it is using. As near as I can tell I have the
> function turned on, and as near as I can tell, it has never flagged
> anything as junk on its own.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> Is there a way of setting up a message filter that says "if the sender
> is not in my address book then delete it"?
If possible you'd better implement this at the mail server, so the
sender knows it's message has been discarded. Usi
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 15:42 +0100, Franck Routier wrote:
> thanks Erik for your response.
> In fact Postfix' logs indicate that Evolution is not sending a certificate.
> So my question is more :
>
> Is Evolution supposed to be able to do it (and then what is the magic) ?
> or is it just not a feat
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 14:03 +0100, Franck Routier wrote:
> Nobody on this one ?
> > I am still having trouble sending mail via a secure Postfix smtp server.
> >
> > My Postfix server is configured to ask its clients for a TLS
> > certificate, and will (or won't) allow relaying based on the client'
Following up on my earlier mails on the subject.
I have now the glibc zimezone setup OK, zdump JST reports a difference
of ~ 8 hours which seems to be correct.
Evolution still says JST is 1 hour from CET though.
I am puzzled.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 13:19 +0100, Terje Bråten wrote:
> >skylla erik:~ $ zdump JST
> >JST Mon Jan 2 12:01:29 2006 JST
> >skylla erik:~ $ zdump CET
> >CET Mon Jan 2 13:01:34 2006 CET
> >
> >That indeed seems to be the case. I don't know how to fix it though...
> >It seems the definition for JS
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 15:23 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:53 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> [snip]
> > What he means is that all time zone info is obtained from the system and
> > is not held within Evo. Perhaps "CET" or "JST" means something
> > different to the syste
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 17:23 -0500, William Case wrote:
> Got some confidence building questions -- just checking before I try
> something that is new to me -- manually adding spam filters.
>
> I have almost no spam anymore thanks to spamassassin and my cable IP's
> spam control. However, I do hav
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:13 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > But it gives me a choice of pop OR maildir. I need my messages to be
> > > downloaded from the POP server then delivered into the maildir.
> >
> > Create *both* a "POP" (which is really a local mbox) *and* a maildir
> > store.
>
> Ah so
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:35 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >I don't have this problem, because the mail comes in at different IMAP
> >accounts.
> And you leave the mail in the IMAP folders? Not local store?
I have some filters that move all mail to the imap server at home (so in
a sense, this
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:02 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
[ ... ]
> >Hmmm, at first sight this looks a bit like my situation. I manage home
> >and work mail accounts from evolution. Mail that gets sent to my work
> >account, and I reply to, automatically has my work's origin address and
> >my wo
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:07 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > And THIS is the cause of Evo's scalability problems - it would be better
> > > if Evo *internally* use one file per message AKA maildir.
> >
> > I don't see the problem if it uses an *index*.
>
> Evo takes 5 minutes to close as it has to
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:23 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
[ ... ]
> Thunderbird offers 'profiles' as well as 'personalities' within a
> profile. Of course here too I need multiple Thunderbirds off an
> running. So I may just be doing yet another indirection here too.
>
> Mail has to be solv
> > But it gives me a choice of pop OR maildir. I need my messages to be
> > downloaded from the POP server then delivered into the maildir.
>
> Create *both* a "POP" (which is really a local mbox) *and* a maildir
> store.
>
> When you click on Get/Send, it will drop the emails into the mbox
> f
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:14 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 19:55 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > These messages are then stored into an evolution-specific format which
> > you cannot select and has nothing to do with mbox or maildir.
>
> Yes, this was what
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
