On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:52 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:17 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > I agree, and this has been mentioned several times in the past. The big
> > > problem as I see it is that there is no *standard* way of telling a mail
> > > server what is junk and what isn't. Remember that many mail hubs don't
> > > allow the user to log in. For any given setup there's certainly a way to
> > > hack the funcionality and the Junk/Not Junk buttons give you some
> > > leverage, but basically it's up to you to program them.
> > 
> > BTW a user configurable junk/not junk button would be the solution (one
> > option being to run a user defined script).
> 
> You can already do that (by messing with XML files and/or modifying the
> meaning of spamd/spamc on your machine). The problem is that every user
> has to do it for himself because so much depends on your exact setup.

But that's not evolution's problem ;-)

The problem is that the desired functionality indeed is different for
every setup.

The built-in functionality doesn't do it anyway (also with a custom
"spamc" script) because evolution does more than I want (for instance,
move it to the virtual junk folder).

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to