Hi David,
>> >> There's still a little problem though when adding a caption:
>> >>
>> >> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> >> #+CAPTION: toto
>> >> [[file:toto.png]]
>> >> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>> >
>> > Indeed. I over
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Matt Lundin wrote:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> But following on your statement that the features will still be there,
>> I would actually suggest to introduce an "Org Babel Mode" which would
>> *disable* features like archiving - the archiving feature (very usefu
David Maus ictsoc.de> writes:
>
>
> I suppose more a glitch. AFAIK there is currently no distinction
> between real link target paths (files, directories etc.) and
> expressions that would qualify as a query part of a link (e.g. like
> the regexp).
>
> Maybe fiddling with percent escaping (Cf
Hi,
Exporting the following links:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Exporting a [[http://www.google.com][*bold link*]].
Exporting a *[[http://www.google.com][bold link]]*.
Exporting an [[http://www.google.com][/italic link/]].
Exporting an /[[http://www.google.co
Hi Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K writes:
> This is a formal request to integrate my org-html.el & org-odt.el
> changes in to the master branch.
Thanks a *LOT* for this work! I'm willing to help as much as possible
to get this integrated.
> This patch introduces 3 major features:
> 1. A generic
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Another great way to use Org-mode..
>
> http://xkcd.com/874/
:)
I won't stop hacking Org till it is explicitely quoted in xkcd.
That's the only true test for success!
--
Bastien
Hi,
I'd love to try it out, but I'm not good at git. Would someone be kind
enough to post directions?
I thought this would do it:
git checkout 3d802
git checkout -b ooo
git apply
../0001-Re-implement-org-export-as-html-and-add-support-for-.patch
But I got:
error: patch failed: lisp/org.el
Bastien,
>> This patch introduces 3 major features:
>> 1. A generic exporter
>
> Let me understand: this is more a generalization of the HTML export than
> a true generic exporter, right? The docstring of org-do-export suggests
> so. Rewriting org-html.el so that the HTML export is done in a mo
Christian
Thanks being the first one here (again).
I have tried incorporating some subset (and not all) of your feedback on
the new odt exporter. My priority was to get the html exporter and the
generic interface right.
> Hi,
>
> I'd love to try it out, but I'm not good at git. Would someone b
How does this relate to the docbook exporter?
I ask because I needed a generic exporter (this was more than a year ago)
and I made do with the docbook exporter for that purpose
Christian Moe writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'd love to try it out, but I'm not good at git. Would someone be kind
> enough to post directions?
>
> I thought this would do it:
>
> git checkout 3d802
> git checkout -b ooo
> git apply
> ../0001-Re-implement-org-export-as-html-and-add-support-for-.patch
>
> But
> How does this relate to the docbook exporter?
(In principle), Docbook exporter can move to the new core. This would
considerably reduce the size of the org-docbook.el.
> I ask because I needed a generic exporter (this was more than a year
> ago) and I made do with the docbook exporter for that
> 1. A generic exporter
There is lots of generic exporter floating around and I don't want to
add to confusion. Let's call the new patch `newhtml' with the
understanding that the patch does much more than offer a new html and
odt backends.
For the developers among us, refer to the following post
Andrea Crotti writes:
> I was carrying around this issue since long time, but today I finally
> understood what exactly the source is.
>
> Suppose I have this very simple orgfile, if I try to export it to html I
> get the error as below. Can anyone else reproduce it? I guess is
> font-locking p
Hi,
I chair a particular committee at work and am responsible for keeping
track of any actions that arise from our meetings. I use org for this
(obviously ;-). So far, so good.
I would like to move to a system in which all the actions are numbered
sequentially. At present, they are numbered se
2011/3/21 Eric S Fraga :
> Andrea Crotti writes:
>
> This works just fine for me. No errors at all and the code (html)
> generated seems fine. Try latest git version maybe in case the problem
> has somehow been fixed in the 30+ commits made 2since the version you
> used?
>
Right it works also f
Hi, Jambunathan,
Thanks, I should have tested first if the previous instructions
worked. I think I have it set up now.
With a minimal Emacs as per the old instructions, and with one minor
change to your test file (`LaTeX:verbatim' -- I don't have dvipng
installed), I get this:
Debugger en
On 21.3.2011, at 09:25, Bastien wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> Another great way to use Org-mode..
>>
>> http://xkcd.com/874/
>
> :)
>
> I won't stop hacking Org till it is explicitely quoted in xkcd.
> That's the only true test for success!
Yess!
:D
- Carsten
On Fri, Mar 18 2011, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There's a misunderstanding: AFAIK the patch sent by Tassilo does not
> make the completion-at-point-function return a "function that performs
> completion" but does properly return completion data (i.e. region start,
> region end, and completion table),
David Maus writes:
> At Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:46:19 -0400,
> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>> I think there is yet another HTML export issue with the current
>> development code.
>
> Indeed. This should be fixed now as well.
Hi David,
Thanks for the quick fix!
Regards,
--
Bernt
Julien Danjou writes:
Hi Julien,
> To be clear, the things that disturbs me is that this simple test case
> does not work as I would like it to:
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (defun jd:completion-at-point-test ()
> (list (point-at-bol) (point) '("Steve" "John")))
> (add-to-list 'completion-at
Hello Christian
Thanks for your first bug report. I have the habit of not using
byte-compilation.
The reason for the crash you have reported is that
`with-org-html-preserve-paragraph-state' is a macro and some of the
references to it preceded the definition. As a result the byte compiler
was mi
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Sorry, but I totally missed the point of the example. :-)
Damn it! I tried hard. :-)
> Isn't completion of "L" to "Lionel" at the beginning of a line exactly
> what your completion function should enable?
No. To give a even more concrete application of
On Fri, Mar 18 2011, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> The first line (Version:...) can change from machine to machine and over
> time (as gpg is updated with a new version.) This is problematic when
> the file is stored under version control, because as you decrypt and
> encrypt an entry that line will chan
Le Wang writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Le Wang writes:
>>
>>> Why did you give up on yasnippet?
>>
>> Confusion amongst the key bindings, between org, yasnippet and the
>> autocompletion tools I have been trying. I want to be able to use TAB
>> for completion
Julien Danjou writes:
Hi Julien,
>> Isn't completion of "L" to "Lionel" at the beginning of a line
>> exactly what your completion function should enable?
>
> No. To give a even more concrete application of my example: I'd like
> org-contacts to give completion for email addresses or nicknames.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> Another great way to use Org-mode..
>>
>> http://xkcd.com/874/
>
> :)
>
> I won't stop hacking Org till it is explicitely quoted in xkcd.
> That's the only true test for success!
Amen!
--
Manish
From: Christian Egli
* org-taskjuggler.el: Fix a typo in the commentary.
---
lisp/org-taskjuggler.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org-taskjuggler.el b/lisp/org-taskjuggler.el
index bcf2c45..f891634 100644
--- a/lisp/org-taskjuggler.el
+++ b/lisp/
From: Christian Egli
* org-taskjuggler.el (org-taskjuggler-assign-resource-ids): Replace
recursive implementation with an iterative one.
That way we can avoid to have ask users to increase
`max-lisp-eval-depth'.
---
lisp/org-taskjuggler.el | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(
From: Christian Egli
* org-taskjuggler.el (org-taskjuggler-open-task): Only emit a "purge
allocations" statement if we are not targeting tj3.
---
lisp/org-taskjuggler.el |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org-taskjuggler.el b/lisp/org-taskjuggler.el
Hi all
Here are some more small fixes to taskjuggler export
Thanks
Christian Egli (3):
Replace recursive implementation with an iterative one
Fix allocations handling for tj3
Fix a typo in the commentary.
lisp/org-taskjuggler.el | 22 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertio
Hi,
I see. Would you like to continue to receive bug reports based on
byte-compilation, or should I just load the sources for now?
Yours,
Christian
On 3/21/11 2:31 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
Hello Christian
Thanks for your first bug report. I have the habit of not using
byte-compilation.
Th
Hi all,
since I installed Org 7.5, I noticed that when I publish an html
project to a local directory, backup copies of the existing html files
are kept, with a tilde attached to their name. As far as I remember,
this wasn't happening before. Is there a way to disable it? I couldn't
find a
>> There's a misunderstanding: AFAIK the patch sent by Tassilo does not
>> make the completion-at-point-function return a "function that performs
>> completion" but does properly return completion data (i.e. region start,
>> region end, and completion table), part of which happens to be
>> represen
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> That sentence is obsolete. Sorry 'bout that. A collection can be
> any function, including a lambda expression.
Should I open a bug about that to keep track of it?
(asking in case you're already working on a fix or not)
> completion-at-point-functio
> What I'd like to do is that if the user enters:
> doc
> is that it can be completed to
>"Emmett Brown "
In a BBDB discussion, I suggested to complete the above to "Emmett Brown
\"doc\" ", but it's true that you may prefer to
keep the nickname private.
In that case it's really not a c
> Hi,
>
> I see. Would you like to continue to receive bug reports based on
> byte-compilation, or should I just load the sources for now?
The one you reported is a serious error and I have fixed it.
Anything amounting to a crash or a crash in waiting has to be
immeditately addressed. As for wa
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> As Tassilo mentions, maybe we could have a post-completion step that can
> perform some kind of expansion/replacement/cleanup once a valid
> completion is selected. I'm not sure what that would look like in terms
> of code and API, but if someone wants
Hello again,
going back to the original subject of this thread (although thanks all
for your inputs on yasnippet ;-), I have started working on a new
document and am finding the slowdown of navigation (next-line) very
annoying. In this document, I have two gnuplot source blocks.
Navigating throug
Hi,
> I see. Would you like to continue to receive bug reports based on
> byte-compilation, or should I just load the sources for now?
>
Just pushed a fix that nukes all the warnings that the byte-compiler was
generating.
Jambunathan K.
Matt Lundin writes:
> Markus Heller writes:
>
>> I'm trying to get the following to work:
>>
>> (org-add-agenda-custom-command
>> '("X" tags "Task"
>>((org-agenda-skip-function '(org-agenda-skip-entry-if
>> 'notregexp "Admin"))
>> (org-agenda-overriding-hea
What is the best way to publishh org-mode outlines to google docs.
I can upload the PDF, but I need the resulting google docs to be editable.
thanks
Daniel
Hi,
Very, very nice!
Tested with a minimal emacs, using Org-mode version 7.5
(baseline.6.g533ba.dirty), GNU Emacs 23.2.1
(powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, NS apple-appkit-949.54) on a Mac.
Notes on the resulting test.odt document (I've had only a quick look
at the html, so what follows refers onl
Hi all
This is my first post. First, I'd like to thank all the org-mode developers
for a great tool.
I'm a technical editor. I am facinated by the pros and cons of structured
documents with regard to their ease of use and power. I think that they are
probably far too restrictive and cumbersome (l
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Daniel Mahler wrote:
> What is the best way to publishh org-mode outlines to google docs.
> I can upload the PDF, but I need the resulting google docs to be editable.
>
How about usign the experimental odt exporter?
> thanks
> Daniel
>
>
--
Suvayu
Open sourc
Hi Eric,
Eric S Fraga wrote:
> going back to the original subject of this thread (although thanks all for
> your inputs on yasnippet ;-), I have started working on a new document and
> am finding the slowdown of navigation (next-line) very annoying. In this
> document, I have two gnuplot source bl
Hello all!
I would like to be able to have same keywords for both HTML and PDF output. I
was a bit surprised that it is not there yet. I’m not a lisp user:( Could
someone suggest what needs to be done to use org-export-page-keywords to set
the value of pdfkeywords option of hyperref LaTeX packa
>> As Tassilo mentions, maybe we could have a post-completion step that can
>> perform some kind of expansion/replacement/cleanup once a valid
>> completion is selected. I'm not sure what that would look like in terms
>> of code and API, but if someone wants to try it out a propose a patch to
>> s
Daniel Mahler writes:
> What is the best way to publishh org-mode outlines to google docs.
> I can upload the PDF, but I need the resulting google docs to be editable.
http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=186466&topic=1153381
Best,
Matt
John Tait writes:
>
> While I am here (sorry), I couldn't get #+FILETAGS: to work in org-version
> 7.4.
>
> For example, if I export a file (to html) File1.org with
> "#+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: john", and then I include File2.org, I can see
> File2.org included as part the export of File1 as expecte
Nick Dokos hp.com> writes:
> org uses timestamps to figure out which files need publishing
> (see section 13.4 of the Org manual) and they may have gotten
> curdled somehow. You can force publication by giving a second
> argument to org-publish (if you called it interactively, you
> could do that
Stefan Monnier writes:
>>> As Tassilo mentions, maybe we could have a post-completion step that can
>>> perform some kind of expansion/replacement/cleanup once a valid
>>> completion is selected. I'm not sure what that would look like in terms
>>> of code and API, but if someone wants to try it
> May I propose an additional feature?
> We could assign tags to hierarchies of other tags.
As a technical editor how do you think you would make use of
hierarchical tags. Without getting in to how this feature might be
implemented, if you can articulate your particular requirements and your
par
>
> While this topic is raised, would it make sense for Org-mode table
> formula to automatically parse any time-like string into time units
> (i.e., base sixty). That would be the easiest for most users, and (I
> imagine) would rarely result in surprising and unexpected behavior.
>
So, I took a
Aidan Gauland wrote:
> Nick Dokos hp.com> writes:
> > org uses timestamps to figure out which files need publishing
> > (see section 13.4 of the Org manual) and they may have gotten
> > curdled somehow. You can force publication by giving a second
> > argument to org-publish (if you called it in
55 matches
Mail list logo
