Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cleaned out and reinstalled - I have a feeling an old "root" .elc
> might have hidden the function, but now I get
>
> ,
> | org-date-to-gregorian: Symbol's function definition is void:
> calendar-gregorian-from-absolute
> `
>
> When I run or
Hi,
the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
close to 20 email a day.
I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
things cool off a bit?
- Carsten
P.S. I know that this will lead to ev
> From: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Orgmode] POLL: Volume of emacs-orgmode too high?
> To: org-mode list
>
> Hi,
>
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away som
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> things cool off a bit?
I think it i
On 2007-10-16 10:00 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> things co
Hello,
Sometimes I bring up remember and then decide not to use it. If I'm
already writing a note, C-c C-k works just fine (thanks for that
feature!).
But often I decide not to write a note while picking a template - so I
just press C-g. This leaves the remember buffer visible afterwards.
Could
Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> I guess this would be as easy as
>>
>> (defun org-new-heading-after-current ()
>> "Insert a new heading with same level as current, after current
>> subtree."
>> (interactive)
>> (org-back-to-heading)
>> (org-insert-heading)
>> (org-move-subtree-d
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to address
> this, or will people stick around and just wait until things cool off a bit?
Emacs Gnus, using adaptive scoring, causes the org-mode list to be at most
5-10 postings a day f
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> things cool off a bit?
>
> - Ca
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *title:tag:
I think this is not a good idea. It would breack the logical meaning of
"..." and the way it's used outside of Org.
> But, on that subject is it possible to see inherited tags (maybe in a
> different face?)?.
Use th
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until things
> cool off a bit?
For my part, it's okay, and I will slow down a bit :)
> P.S. I know that this will lead to ev
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think this is not a good idea. It would breack the logical meaning of
>> "..." and the way it's used outside of Org.
>
> For readability we will have to agree to disagree on that one. When
> scanning headings I dont want to have to move the eyes ri
No problem for me. It's nice to have such an active and friendly community.
Ian.
I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
things cool off a bit?
___
Emacs-o
Hi,
Nuutti Kotivuori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
>> close to 20 email a day.
>>
>> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
>> address this, or will people stick aroun
Hi Carsten and list,
due to all the traffic on the list (Good Thing) and too much traffic on
the railroad to work this morning (Bad Thing), I went reading up on the
org-mode mailing list and installed the latest version today (was coming
from 4.56), and trying to use column view and properties
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence at the event is no longer necessary. Consequently I
would
If I turn on column view for the whole buffer by pressing "C-c C-x C-c"
at the top of the buffer (blank area), the buffer would be marked
"modified". But if I do it just on a subtree, everything is normal. Does
anybody see the same thing? thanks.
Wanrong
__
Hi, Carsten
I think I've found a bug regarding the hyperlink.
Org-mode version 5.12c
GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2007-06-02 on RELEASE
1. What exactly did you do?
I wrote the file.
I enabled the debugger (Options/Enter Debugger on error)
I clicked on the links.
Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi,
the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
close to 20 email a day.
I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
things cool off a bit?
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> things cool off a bit?
On 10/16/07, Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
> > Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> >> close to 20 email a day.
> >>
> >> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
Hi --
[[resending because I sent earlier from different email address.]]
As I begin to schedule meetings and tasks for the next calendar year, I
find that the default year (if I say, for example, jan 7) is the
current calendar year. Of course, that's what the documentation says it
will be, but ..
I just found out things are even stranger:
I have a level 1 heading "* HR". Every time the column view is turned
on, an extra space is added to the end of that heading, which is why the
buffer is marked "modified". But it only happens on that "HR" heading.
What is so special about the word "H
More observations:
It is not that the word "HR" is so special. Actually, as long as there
is any level 1 heading with two capital letters only, like "AB" "CD"
"HK" or whatever, this strange behavior happens. Does anyone has a clue
about this? Thank you.
Wanrong
Wanrong Lin wrote:
I just
Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence at the event is no longer necessary.
William Henney wrote:
Agreed. I do fall behind on reading it every now and then but I always
try and catch up because the quality of discussions is so high. I like
having such a receptive community.
Agreed too. Sometimes my eyes glaze over the GTD threads, but I can
always mute the threads I
First, apologies for the constant "gimme" nature of my recent
feature-request posts!
org-agenda-custom-commands is awesome in its power. There are one or
two respects in which I think it could be improved, however.
I make extensive use of the functionality added relatively recently
which enables
Rick Moynihan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
> >Hi Carsten,
> >
> >Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
> >think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
> ><>.
> >
> >Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subse
Hi all,
i'd like to have your opinion on this.
I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order.
I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc.
It would be nice to be able to use `1' for the first view -- but
it's currently used to restrict the agenda view t
Bastien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'd like to have your opinion on this.
>
> I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order.
> I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc.
> It would be nice to be able to use `1' for the first view -- but
Adam Spiers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> First, apologies for the constant "gimme" nature of my recent
> feature-request posts!
*sigh* Here I go again ...
Two more ideas for improving org-agenda:
1. Allow custom agenda commands to be given a descriptive name by the
user which appears in the
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another approach, and this is my personal preference, would be to
> allow "sub-keymaps", so that e.g. I could press C-c C-a s and it would
> present me with a further menu of single keystrokes bound to custom
> agenda commands:
>
>C-c C-a s 1search
Hi Adam,
On Oct 16, 2007, at 16:19, Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence
Adam Spiers wrote:
This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today
(if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators.
e.g.
- foo
- bar
- baz |<-- Point
Calling the toggle-list-indicator function at the point will cause the
list indicator to change
On 10/16/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> thi
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm curious about your suggestion of '<<' though - does that imply the
> sub-keymap functionality I asked for already exists?
I first thought yes, since it looks like the first `<' keystroke is
waiting for the next one (at least from the description I pro
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:53:47PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm curious about your suggestion of '<<' though - does that imply the
> > sub-keymap functionality I asked for already exists?
>
> I first thought yes, since it looks like the first `<' keyst
On Oct 16, 2007, at 17:44, Wanrong Lin wrote:
I just found out things are even stranger:
I have a level 1 heading "* HR". Every time the column view is turned
on, an extra space is added to the end of that heading, which is why
the buffer is marked "modified". But it only happens on that "H
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vagn Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I could also see a use for a state-dependent {:}. Display the sum of
>> times and also the sum of times for tasks that are DONE. E.g. for
>> adding time-estimates and measuring progress. Or maybe add up the
>> not
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 16, 2007, at 17:44, Wanrong Lin wrote:
I just found out things are even stranger:
I have a level 1 heading "* HR". Every time the column view is turned
on, an extra space is added to the end of that heading, which is why
the buffer is marked "modified". But it
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> the mailing list has been extremely active recently, we have had
> close to 20 email a day.
>
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> things cool of
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> `< <' : cycle through default restricted states (see above)
>
> Hmm, that doubles the number of keypresses to achieve a given state,
> which is a bit cumbersome. But if it's customizable, who cares? :-)
I wouldn't mind having single keys to achieve this
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am worried that this will scare away some members. Do we need to
> address this, or will people stick around and just wait until
> things cool off a bit?
Doesn't worry me at all. I know I haven't posted anything for a long
while but I am still happ
First, I have just begun to use column view. Although it seems it still
has bugs here and there, it is a awesome concept! I never thought in a
text based system we can achieve something similar to MS project (Sort
of. I wouldn't want to see org-mode to emulate everything in MS project
anyway.
On 14/10/2007, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First impressions are that Blorg seems to work quite well, though it
> > takes some setting up, and could be made more flexible
>
> Sure. I wrote blorg more than one year ago, and I made the mistake of
> trying too add too many functions too ea
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By the way, I probably could have coded this in the time it took to
> write the mail, but I thought that until I've sent a piece of paper to
> the FSF assigning rights for code contributed to org-mode and emacs,
> it would be better to let Carsten write it
Hi all
With my increased use of org-mode I have also started using M-x
calendar and the diary. For a while I've been wanting to have a
printed version of my calendar for offline use. Also I quite like the
idea of the pocketMod. Now the calendar mode itself can generate some
quite fancy latex prin
Christian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What constitutes a "small patch" I don't know. Might be answered in
> one of the GNU FAQs.
>From memory: beyond 15 lines, the patch is not small anymore.
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order.
> I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc.
Why not just display all those views, in order, with one custom command?
For example, when I'm at home, I run C-c a h:
Christian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached script generates a pocketMod style pdf which contains the
> next four weeks, the next three months and the current year on one
> page. It also generates a hipsterPDA style printout which contains the
> same calendars to be used in hipsterPD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew J. Korty) writes:
> Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order.
>> I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc.
>
> Why not just display all those views, in order, with one custom
> co
Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes it's a good strategy and one that's worked well for org-mode. I
> do however have some features which I'd like to see. If it's not too
> rude, I'll list some here:
>
> - Ability to define your own HTML 's. Specifically here the
> issue was wanting to list
Christian,
Because I've been trying something similar (but not as advanced), I'm
intrigued by the possibilities of your approach. Sadly, I can't run
your Makefile. I get an error[1]. Am I missing something?
About font size, I've found that for what we're trying to do, it helps
to replace \tiny wi
On Oct 15, 2007, at 22:59, Fabian Braennstroem wrote:
One more great feature would be an additional option to the
'tree-to-indirect-buffer' function from the resulting agenda
view.
An indirect buffer is not something that is extracted, it is just
another view on the same buffer. In this case
On Oct 16, 2007, at 16:49, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
Hi, Carsten
I think I've found a bug regarding the hyperlink.
Org-mode version 5.12c
GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2007-06-02 on RELEASE
1. What exactly did you do?
I wrote the file.
I enabled the debugger (Options/E
On Oct 16, 2007, at 23:23, Wanrong Lin wrote:
First, I have just begun to use column view. Although it seems it
still has bugs here and there, it is a awesome concept! I never
thought in a text based system we can achieve something similar to MS
project (Sort of. I wouldn't want to see org-
On Oct 16, 2007, at 18:22, Adam Spiers wrote:
Rick Moynihan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my
57 matches
Mail list logo
