Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another approach, and this is my personal preference, would be to > allow "sub-keymaps", so that e.g. I could press C-c C-a s and it would > present me with a further menu of single keystrokes bound to custom > agenda commands: > > C-c C-a s 1 search for :sub10: (10 minute tasks) > C-c C-a s 2 search for :sub120: (2 hour tasks) > C-c C-a s 3 search for :sub30: (30 minute tasks) > C-c C-a s 4 search for :sub40: (4 hour tasks) > > etc. > > Not only would this approach make it easier to avoid binding conflicts > with hard-coded bindings, but it also has the advantage of providing > distinct keymaps for different types of searches, e.g. one keymap > could be for searching by GTD context, another by task A/B/C priority, > another by TODO keyword, and so on. > > Thoughts?
Fully agreed on sub-keymaps -- even though I have no clue on how hard it is to implement. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
