Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Christian Egli wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Bulk action
>
>
> We can add more actions, if you convince
On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Christian Egli wrote:
Hi all
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Bulk action
We can add more actions, if you convince me they make sense.
IMHO setting scheduled (and maybe deadline)
On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Yes, both shifting by the same amount and setting a fixed date can
be
useful. I usually re-schedule leftover todos by shifting them by one
or two working days to the fu
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
>> Yes, both shifting by the same amount and setting a fixed date can be
>> useful. I usually re-schedule leftover todos by shifting them by one
>> or two working days to the future. So originally I had a bulk version of
>>
On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Yes, both shifting by the same amount and setting a fixed date can be
useful. I usually re-schedule leftover todos by shifting them by one
or two working days to the future. So originally I had a bulk
version of
`org-agenda-do-date-later' and f
Christian Egli wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
>>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
Bulk action
We can add more actions, if you convince me they make sense.
>>>
>>> IMHO setting scheduled (and maybe deadline) date wou
Hi all
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>> Bulk action
>>>
>>>
>>> We can add more actions, if you convince me they make sense.
>>
>> IMHO setting scheduled (and maybe deadline) date would make sense.
>
> In what
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Bulk action
You can now use the `s' key to select entries in the agenda.
When one or more entries have been selected, the `B' key will
execute an action on all selected entries. I believe this bulk
action
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Bulk action
>
>
> You can now use the `s' key to select entries in the agenda.
> When one or more entries have been selected, the `B' key will
> execute an action on all selected entries. I believe this bulk
> action makes mainly sense for the commands that
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I have changed the key bindings now:
>
> sback to save files, even tough I think C-x C-s is fine
> If I find a use for "s" later, I will probably take it
> vd
> vw
> vm
> vy for the day, week, month, year views
>
> d
> w still available shortcuts for day and
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have uploaded release 6.28. Once more I urge you to read
> the release notes carefully, there are many very interesting changes.
Thanks, as ever, for this fantastic update! I'm looking forward to using
the new batch agenda operations.
- Matt
_
On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
With `d' and `w' in place, `m' and `y' are consistent, logical.
However, I don't believe anyone uses monthly views, I am sure
that no-one uses yearly views, right? So I will negotiate over
`m', i someone can propose a
Carsten Dominik writes:
> With `d' and `w' in place, `m' and `y' are consistent, logical.
> However, I don't believe anyone uses monthly views, I am sure
> that no-one uses yearly views, right? So I will negotiate over
> `m', i someone can propose a viable alternative that makes sense.
I use mo
On Jun 25, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Changes in Version 6.28
===
Bulk action
You can now use the `s' key to select entries in the agenda.
When one or more entries have been selected, the `B' key will
execute an action on all selected entries. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
