On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Yes, both shifting by the same amount and setting a fixed date can be
useful. I usually re-schedule leftover todos by shifting them by one
or two working days to the future. So originally I had a bulk
version of
`org-agenda-do-date-later' and friends in mind as opposed to
`org-agenda-schedule'. But the latter one would be useful to. Ideally,
S-left, C-cC-s et al. would trigger a bulk shift/bulk schedule
whenever
there are marked agenda items.
I am not so sure about this last point. I am not a
fan of automatic bulk action if several items are selected.
- these lists can become long, and selected entries might
be off the screen
- for this to make sense, selected entries should remain
selected after action, increasing the danger of unwanted action
- you might be in the process of selecting some entries, when you
want to do a quick action on an individual entry you come across.
But you cannot, because any action will act on all selected ones.
So I do prefer a special command like "B" to introduce bulk action.
Opinions?
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
