OK, great.
- Carsten
On 4.3.2013, at 15:45, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>>> Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities?
>>
>> That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be
>> preferred to what I am doing right now?
>
> I di
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
>> Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities?
>
> That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be
> preferred to what I am doing right now?
I didn't realize you had already modified the code. I think both methods
are equivalent.
Th
On 28.2.2013, at 22:10, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>
>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>>
I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
>>>
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
>>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
>>
>> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share mark
On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
>
> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base
> buffer.
I think i
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base
buffer.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
On 28.2.2013, at 11:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> OK, I pushed this change, maybe it is good if you have a brief look,
>> Nicolas.
>
> Thanks for the patch. It looks good. I have one minor suggestion,
> though. In the following snippet:
>
> (eq (marke
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> OK, I pushed this change, maybe it is good if you have a brief look,
> Nicolas.
Thanks for the patch. It looks good. I have one minor suggestion,
though. In the following snippet:
(eq (marker-buffer org-export-dispatch-last-position)
(curre
On 28.2.2013, at 09:39, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 27.2.2013, at 16:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires
>>> that I study the ui interface a bit more.
>>
>> I think the only pieces of the UI in
On 27.2.2013, at 16:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires
>> that I study the ui interface a bit more.
>
> I think the only pieces of the UI involved are `org-export-dispatch'
> function and `org-export-di
Carsten Dominik writes:
> OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires
> that I study the ui interface a bit more.
I think the only pieces of the UI involved are `org-export-dispatch'
function and `org-export-dispatch-last-action' variable.
> If you want to rush ahead and
On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the
>> previous export action, that is extremely useful.
>>
>> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I
>> was wondering if others would also find t
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> > Carsten Dominik writes:
> >
> >> When exporting a subtree, lets drop a mark at the
> >> headline and then go to this mark when C-c C-e is
> >> called with a prefix argument
On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the
>> previous export action, that is extremely useful.
>>
>> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I
>> was wondering if others would also find t
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the
> previous export action, that is extremely useful.
>
> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I
> was wondering if others would also find this proposal
> useful:
>
> When exporting a subtree, lets drop a
Hi,
I have a question about the exporter dispatcher.
I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the
previous export action, that is extremely useful.
I often only export a subtree of a document, and I
was wondering if others would also find this proposal
useful:
When exporting a subtree, lets
16 matches
Mail list logo
