Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to >>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this. >> >> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base >> buffer. > > I think it is necessary. If I move a marker to a position > in a buffer and another marker to the same position in a connected > indirect buffer, both markers are different and point to different > buffers. So if I start an export from an indirect buffer, the > dispatch marker will point to the indirect buffer. If I later > compare the marker-buffer with (org-base-buffer (current-buffer)) I > do get a mismatch. So if you want to compare to org-base-buffer, > I think I clearly need to set the marker to a position in the base > buffer.
Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
