On 28.2.2013, at 22:10, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to >>>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this. >>> >>> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base >>> buffer. >> >> I think it is necessary. If I move a marker to a position >> in a buffer and another marker to the same position in a connected >> indirect buffer, both markers are different and point to different >> buffers. So if I start an export from an indirect buffer, the >> dispatch marker will point to the indirect buffer. If I later >> compare the marker-buffer with (org-base-buffer (current-buffer)) I >> do get a mismatch. So if you want to compare to org-base-buffer, >> I think I clearly need to set the marker to a position in the base >> buffer. > > Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities? That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be preferred to what I am doing right now? - Carsten > > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou
