At Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:13:18 -0400,
Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>
> on Thu Sep 22 2011, David Maus wrote:
>
> >> > The link escaping was changed in November 2010, maybe the link in
> >> > question is an old one?
> >>
> >> Yep.
> >
> > Good. This explains it.
>
> I think it's unfortunate that link escap
On Sun, Sep 25 2011, Samuel Wales wrote:
[...]
> My goal is simple: go through entries in the already-built agenda and
> dim anything that has a descendent in the same agenda.
>
> Hierarchical sorting is for the future. And it is undesirable if you
> do not have the horizontal real estate to in
On 2011-09-24, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> into trees -- how you format what is wide open. To be honest I'm not
> sure how one would go about "dimming" a TODO (I don't think font
> properties support something like "reduce the opacity of the current
> foreground color by 50%"), but that's something t
On Sun, Sep 25 2011, Samuel Wales wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Looks like you put a lot of work into this.
Not that much work, in the end -- most of the effort was figuring out
how the existing code works.
> Some comments:
>
> On 2011-09-24, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> along the way. One bonus is that e
Reposting due to no replies:
I have been studying extensively and have not found a quick way to hide the
nearest heading (which contains point) as well as the entire sparse tree. I
often have two or more sparse trees open as I go look for information
elsewhere and then want to return to the place
Hi Eric,
Looks like you put a lot of work into this.
Some comments:
On 2011-09-24, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> along the way. One bonus is that each level of TODO
> subtrees gets sorted distinctly.
My goal (which might be different from yours) is as stated
in the subject header; it's merely to di
Hello
I'm testing org-export-as-odt-and-open on Jambunathan's test.org file.
I get error message "Unable to create odt file (53)".
Is this caused by the fact that files are created in different directories?
a) org-export-as-odt-and-open creates the file e:/User/home/pub_html/test.odt
wheras
b
"Sebastien Vauban" writes:
> Hi Martyn and Eric,
>
> Martyn Jago wrote:
>> Eric Schulte writes:
>>> Martyn Jago writes:
Eric Schulte writes:
> I've just pushed up what will hopefully be a more general solution.
> Basically, language-specific test files can now signal errors if the
Martyn Jago writes:
> Hi Eric
>
> Eric Schulte writes:
>
>> Martyn Jago writes:
>>
>>> Hi Eric
>>>
>>> Eric Schulte writes:
>>>
Hi Martyn,
I've just pushed up what will hopefully be a more general solution.
Basically, language-specific test files can now signal errors if th
On 9/24/11 7:16 AM, John Wiegley wrote:
Dave Abrahams writes:
I have habits that I need to perform, e.g., every weekday, or four times a
week. I don't see a way to express that. If I could schedule a task for
+1.4d or +1.75d (respectively), I'd be happy.
Habits aren't really for schedulin
>From 81ab272ab709c45e898831e5e019e02cfc6617fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Abrahams
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:21:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add indirect agenda follow mode
By setting `org-agenda-follow-indirect' to a non-nil value,
`org-agenda-follow-mode' will use an indirect buffer to di
Hi,
I'm using org-mobile-push to generate my mobile agendas file. Everything is
working fine, except the org-enforce-todo-dependencies option. The output I
obtain in my generated agendas.org file is same as I would see in my agenda
without org-enforce-todo-dependencies set to t.
As far as I under
On 2011-09-24, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Good point. I don't need a fancy syntax if I can express it with elisp,
> of course. Maybe enabling that would be a good first step.
Agreed here also that fancy syntax is not necessary.
IMO a good goal is actually to reduce syntax for new features rather
t
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
on Sat Sep 24 2011, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> I think the basic parts of such a language might be:
>>
>> - predicates, e.g. Mon,Wed,Fri; the first week of each month; the first
>> tuesday of the month
>> - periods, e.g. 1 month
>> - re
On Sat, Sep 24 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote:
[...]
>
> I think the basic parts of such a language might be:
>
> - predicates, e.g. Mon,Wed,Fri; the first week of each month; the first
> tuesday of the month
> - periods, e.g. 1 month
> - repetitions, e.g. 5 times
Looks like you're coming up on th
on Sat Sep 24 2011, John Wiegley wrote:
>> Dave Abrahams writes:
>
>> I have habits that I need to perform, e.g., every weekday, or four times a
>> week. I don't see a way to express that. If I could schedule a task for
>> +1.4d or +1.75d (respectively), I'd be happy.
>
> Habits aren't re
On Sat, Sep 24 2011, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Okay, here's an attempt at indicating nested todos in the todo agenda
> view.
That might not have been the most useful way to attach the diff, sorry.
diff --git a/lisp/org-agenda.el b/lisp/org-agenda.el
index b1fa5f5..417566d 100644
--- a/lisp/org-ag
Okay, here's an attempt at indicating nested todos in the todo agenda
view.
The more I futzed with comparing consecutive TODOs the hackier it
seemed, so I went with something more fundamental. Right now I think
this is a bigger solution than the problem warranted, but it might also
open the way to
> Dave Abrahams writes:
> I have habits that I need to perform, e.g., every weekday, or four times a
> week. I don't see a way to express that. If I could schedule a task for
> +1.4d or +1.75d (respectively), I'd be happy.
Habits aren't really for scheduling, they're for monitoring a simpl
20 matches
Mail list logo
