On Sun, 19 May 2013 10:30:00 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > /* --- test (not cubox) *
> > &dcon { status = "okay"; };
> >
> > &lcd1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > clocks =<&core_clk 3>,<0>,<&lcdclk>,<0>;
> > marvell,port-type =<1>;
> > display-timings {
> > mo
On Sun, 19 May 2013 10:30:00 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > /* --- test (not cubox) *
> > &dcon { status = "okay"; };
> >
> > &lcd1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > clocks =<&core_clk 3>,<0>,<&lcdclk>,<0>;
> > marvell,port-type =<1>;
> > display-timings {
> > mo
On 05/19/2013 08:01 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:09 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> So in the end, we will have a DT node for the HW controllers found
>> in Dove SoCs, a node for TDA998x, and a node for the video card, i.e.
>> _how_ lcd controllers, external e
On 05/19/2013 08:01 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:09 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
So in the end, we will have a DT node for the HW controllers found
in Dove SoCs, a node for TDA998x, and a node for the video card, i.e.
_how_ lcd controllers, external encoders, c
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:09 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> So in the end, we will have a DT node for the HW controllers found
> in Dove SoCs, a node for TDA998x, and a node for the video card, i.e.
> _how_ lcd controllers, external encoders, clocks, maybe audio, ...
> are hooked up on that
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:09 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> So in the end, we will have a DT node for the HW controllers found
> in Dove SoCs, a node for TDA998x, and a node for the video card, i.e.
> _how_ lcd controllers, external encoders, clocks, maybe audio, ...
> are hooked up on that
On 05/18/2013 10:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 09:30:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> The device for tda998x yes, but not the driver. Anyway, Russel decided
>> to have tda998x probed by his drm_driver.
>
> For the simple reason that _that_ is how DRM sl
On 05/18/2013 08:58 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:23:19 -0400
> Rob Clark wrote:
>
>>> These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
>>> right place.
>>
>> You might not want to directly have a hard DT dependency in tda998x,
>> as the encoder cou
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 09:30:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The device for tda998x yes, but not the driver. Anyway, Russel decided
> to have tda998x probed by his drm_driver.
For the simple reason that _that_ is how DRM slave encoders work.
Sometimes, reading the code of the subsystem
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:23:19 -0400
Rob Clark wrote:
> > These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
> > right place.
>
> You might not want to directly have a hard DT dependency in tda998x,
> as the encoder could be used on non-DT platforms. Although a DT to
> enco
On 05/18/2013 07:46 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
>> The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
>> is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hess
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
> is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
> ---
> Cc: Russell King
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel a
The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
---
Cc: Russell King
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jason Cooper
C
On 05/18/2013 10:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 09:30:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
The device for tda998x yes, but not the driver. Anyway, Russel decided
to have tda998x probed by his drm_driver.
For the simple reason that _that_ is how DRM slave enc
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 09:30:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The device for tda998x yes, but not the driver. Anyway, Russel decided
> to have tda998x probed by his drm_driver.
For the simple reason that _that_ is how DRM slave encoders work.
Sometimes, reading the code of the subsystem
On 05/18/2013 08:58 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:23:19 -0400
Rob Clark wrote:
These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
right place.
You might not want to directly have a hard DT dependency in tda998x,
as the encoder could be used on non
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:23:19 -0400
Rob Clark wrote:
> > These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
> > right place.
>
> You might not want to directly have a hard DT dependency in tda998x,
> as the encoder could be used on non-DT platforms. Although a DT to
> enco
On 05/18/2013 07:46 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
...
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
> is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
> ---
> Cc: Russell King
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@l
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:23:19 -0400
> Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> > These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
>> > right place.
>>
>> You might not want to directly have a hard DT dependency in tda998x,
>> as the
The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
---
Cc: Russell King
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jason Cooper
Cc: Jea
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
>> The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
>> is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seba
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:23:19 -0400
> Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> > These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
>> > right place.
>>
>> You might not want to directly have a hard DT dependency in tda998x,
>> as the
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
>> The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
>> is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seba
24 matches
Mail list logo
